國家考試資訊公開之研究

The Study about the Freedom of National Examination Information

呂宜樺(I-Hua Lu)

指導教授 ： 陳淳文

國立臺灣大學/社會科學院/政治學研究所/碩士(2009年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.01967

摘要

政府資訊公開寓有深化民主的意涵，世界各國無不致力於政府資訊公開法制化，我國政府資訊公開法亦民國94年12月28日制定公布。惟基於國家安全及隱私權等因素，並非政府所持有或保管之資訊均需公開，例外時則可以豁免公開。我國國家考試之特色在於具有專業性及高度的屬人性，為確保考試之客觀公平，在考試過程中所產生之資訊，則享有許多保護的空間。然而，對外公開考試資訊是否會妨害考試的公平性，政府資訊公開與國家考試本質之間的關係為何，值得加以討論。
　　本研究從政府資訊公開的角度，探討國家考試資訊公開與保密之議題。並將考試資訊類型化為「一般性考試資訊」及「個人性考試資訊」，從實務面及學理面進行分析。研究發現，在政府資訊公開的潮流下，考試資訊應儘可能地公開，其公開之內容應力求充實完備，惟衡量國家考試制度之特性，得豁免公開，但現行豁免公開之規定卻有過度限制之嫌。因此，本研究提出了公布非題庫委員名單、公布最優作答內容，以及開放應考人閱覽其個人應試試卷，但限制其複印等建議。讓國家考試在政府資訊公開的理念下，除了能維持其公平、公正、公開之原則外，亦能滿足人民知的權利，確立考試之透明度及威信。

關鍵字

資訊公開 ； 國家考試 ； 知的權利 ； 應考試權 ； 閱覽卷宗 ； 典試法

並列摘要

Making the government information known to the public represents a meaning of democracy deepening, so the various countries all devoted to legislation of the freedom of government information; the Freedom of Government Information Law in Taiwan was promulgated on Nov. 28, 2005. However, owing to the national security, privacy and other factors, not every piece of information that the government has held by, or under the control of the government should be publicized, some of which can be exempted from disclosure under a circumstance of exception. The features of the national examination in Taiwan are professionalism and highly people oriented. In order to ensure a fair and objective examination, the examination information arising from exam process is under protection. However, will it hinder the fainess of examination to disclose the examination information? What’s the relation between the freedom of government information? Both of them are worth discussing.
From the perspective of the freedom of government information, the study aims to explore the issues regarding the disclosure and protection of examination information, and to categorize the examination information into “normal examination information” and “personal examination information” to conduct analysis in terms of practice and theory aspects. The study has indicated that the examination information should be as open as possible under the trend of the freedom of government information. The disclosed contents should strive for solidness and perfection, and can also be exempted from disclosure due to the features of national examination system. However, the current disclosure exemption rule is somehow over limited. Therefore, this study suggests that the government should announce the names of non-question drafters and reviewers in question databanks and the good answers, and allow the examinees to peruse their personal answer sheets, and copy on limit. In addition to maintaining fair, plain and public principles under the concept of the freedom of government information, the suggests can also satisfy people’s right to know and ensure the transparency and prestige of national examination.

並列關鍵字

freedom of information ； national examination ； right to know ； right to sit for examination ； access to the file ； Examination Affairs Act

參考文獻

張世賢編，1995，《各國憲法條文彙編》，台北：中華民國公共行政學會。

陳耀森，2001，《關務資訊公開法制問題之研究》，台北：中原大學財經法律研究所碩士論文。

法務部編印，2001，《行政程序法解釋及諮詢小組會議紀錄彙編》。

湯德宗，2000b，《行政程序法論》，台北：元照。

蔡茂寅，2001，《行政程序法實用》，台北：學林。