透過您的圖書館登入
IP:44.222.116.199
  • 學位論文

台灣電價調整政策之論述分析—2012年至2016年

Policy Discourse Analysis of Electricity Price Adjustment in Taiwan: from 2012 to 2016

指導教授 : 林子倫

摘要


2006年到2011年底,台灣電力公司累積虧損超過1000億元,2012年總統大選馬英九順利連任後,便將電力價格調整視為首要任務之一。自2012年4月12日台電公佈電價合理化政策,電價調整方案經歷多次變更,也帶來廣泛的社會討論。2015年1月20日立法院通過新版電價計算公式,其本意為使電價依其成本變動調整,同時限制電價漲幅。然由於國際燃料價格的下跌,使得國內電價自2015年至2016年4月共三度調降,社會上針對電價、環保與國家能源發展掀起另一波討論的聲浪。後實證主義的政策科學家認為,透過研究這些對於政策的意見表達,可以重新理解與解釋公共政策的本質與過程。 本研究以質性的研究方法,分析2012年4月至2016年4月期間國內對於電價調整之政策論述。首先辨識電價調整政策論述之主要行動者,接著將論述整理分類,分析其內容與價值,最後將論述行動者歸納為五個論述聯盟,分別說明其故事情節與核心價值之差異。研究結果發現,電價政策論述之行動者依其所支持的論述故事情節區分為「價格聯盟」、「民意聯盟」、「環保聯盟」、「發展聯盟」與「制度聯盟」五個論述聯盟,主要的論述核心價值則有「社會公平」、「民主監督」、「法規制度」、「市場因素」、「環保節能」與「經濟發展」六項。觀察近幾年的電價調整政策難以達成社會共識,本研究認為關鍵在於重要行動者間對於核心價值概念理解的不同,造成論述缺乏良善對話。

並列摘要


From 2006 to the end of 2011, Taiwan Power Company (Taipower) accumulated losses of more than 100 billion Taiwan Dollar; thus, President Ma Ying-jeou regarded the electricity price adjustment as one of his primary tasks as soon as he was re-elected in the 2012 presidential election. Since Taipower announced the “Electricity Price Rationalizing Policy” on April 12, 2012, price adjustment program had underwent several changes, and also brought a wide range of social discussions. On January 20, 2015, the Legislative Yuan adopted a new version of the electricity price formula, which was intended to adjust electricity prices in accordance with its costs, while limiting the price increase. However, due to the decline of international fuel prices, the domestic electricity price went down three times from 2015 to April 2016, leading the community to begin another wave of discussion about electricity price adjustment, environmental protection and national power development. Post-positivist policy scientists believe that through the study of views and expression of a policy, we can re-understand and explain the nature and process of public policy. This research analyzed the policy discourse of electricity price adjustment in Taiwan by qualitative research methods. First of all, it identified the main actors of the policy, and then classified and analyzed the content and value of their discourse. At last, it inducted the actors into five discourse coalitions, and also respectively explained the differences between the story-lines and the core values. The result of this research showed that the actors involved in the electricity price policy discourse could be divided into five groups, which were the “Price Coalition,” the “Public Opinion Coalition,” the “Environment Coalition,” the “Development Coalition,” and the ”System Coalition.” Their core values included “social justice,” “democracy,” “regulatory,” “market,” “environmental protection,” and “economic development.” It was difficult for the electricity price adjustment policy to reach the social consensus in recent years. This research suggested that the main reason was because the understandings of the core values were different among the important actors, resulting in the lack of good dialogue.

參考文獻


楊智元,2009,〈毒奶粉的風險論述分析與三聚氰胺的管制爭議〉,碩士論文。國立臺灣大學,台北。
郭淑珍 ,2012,〈大臺北地區飲用供水跨域治理問題之研究〉,碩士論文。國立臺灣大學,台北。
凌主悅,2013,〈全國能源會議之核能風險論述分析〉,碩士論文。國立臺灣大學,台北。
梁啟源,2007,〈我國永續發展之能源價格政策〉,《臺灣經濟預測與政策》32(7):1-35。
林子倫,2008,〈台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析〉,《公共行政學報》,28:153-175。

被引用紀錄


黃則鳴(2017)。臺灣核廢料政策之論述分析—2011年至2016年〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU201704409

延伸閱讀