Title

巨神陰影下的台北:摩天樓的再現政治與全球化不均等發展

Translated Titles

The Shadow of Shining Tower in Taipei: Representations of Skyscraper and Uneven Development in Globalization

DOI

10.6342/NTU.2010.02637

Authors

鍾欣倩

Key Words

台北101 ; 摩天樓 ; 再現 ; 公共性 ; 道德消費 ; 階級 ; Taipei101 ; skyscraper ; representation ; publicness ; ethical consumption ; class

PublicationName

臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2010年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

黃宗儀

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本文旨在透過台北101摩天樓此類鉅型建築,分析有關它在接合全球化、全球城市之各種的再現與行銷策略,所牽連出與資本發展的矛盾性,回應對於全球化與不均等發展的主要關懷。在亞洲許多城市企圖與世界爭高的模式中,可以發現在作為後殖民時代下的國家,經常會試圖效法第一世界的巨塔建築形式,以建構並強化一種新興的國家自我認同,同時,這也是象徵國家高度的現代化,更試圖擠身全球城市的地位。然而,爭取摩天樓世界第一的地位,在20世紀末、21世紀初的時代下,是大幅縮短了其擁戴世界第一皇冠的頭銜。因此,在這樣的脈絡下,曾為世界第一高的台北101,它的特殊性地位和對於全球化的意義便顯得格外重要。 透過眾多語言和影像所建構的象徵意義與行銷活動,可謂是彩繪摩天樓最佳的化妝師。然而,服膺於全球資本、跨國菁英的巨塔,表面上高度象徵國家進步的發展;但實際上,卻存有更多包括對於權力、階級身分與公共性等問題之省思。因此,本研究將由台北101的不同論述再現,透過對意識形態的批判,來思考摩天樓的文化意義。究竟我們到底需要摩天樓,還是根本不需要,台北101的案例分析,在作為省思摩天樓和資本的發展外,同時,也是一種對整體亞洲藉由興建摩天樓企圖與世界爭高模式的反省。

English Abstract

This thesis attempts to analyze the mega-project of Taipei 101 in terms of its representations and marketing strategy as a skyscraper in the context of globalization and its self-making as a global city. Addressing the underlying contradiction underlying in the capitalistic logic of development as is seen in the case of Taipei 101, this thesis also intends to tackle the implicated correlation between globalization and uneven development. Postcolonialism has clarified that many Asian cities would imitate those located in the “First World” and construct gigantic buildings, so as to constitute and consolidate national identity of the newly formulated nations. With the establishment of towering skyscrapers, these Asian cities can boast of their extent of modernization and invent themselves as global cities. However, the dream of owning the highest building in the world will be end up as an impossible one, in particular so at the end of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first century. The outcome of such “skyscraper race,” that is, the effort to have the tallest structure on earth, is usually the reduction of the time these cities can assert that they are cities with the highest building and hence of the top status in the world. Considering this, an exploration of Taipei 101, once the tallest building in the word, especially its extraordinary status and its relation with globalization and uneven development, will be of specific significance. The symbolic meanings and marketing strategies created in a plethora of texts can be regarded as the best cosmetician of a given skyscraper. At the superficial level, gigantic towers, whose ideological and material operation pivots upon the global capital and international elites, symbolize the advancement and progress of a given (nation-)state. At the deeper level, they demand a more thorough and critical thinking regarding the interrelationship between power, class, and publicness. Therefore, this thesis will criticize the ideology embedded in the different discourse of Taipei 101 to think the cultural meanings of skyscraper. It is always essential to think over the necessity for a given city to have skyscrapers and highest buildings in the world. In this view, the investigation of Taipei 101 in the thesis suggests not only an examination of the cultural implication of skyscraper and capital development. It also refers to a reflection of the ideological work embedded in the phenomenon of building skyscrapers and “skyscraper race” as is seen in the context of Asia.

Topic Category 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
理學院 > 地理環境資源學研究所
Reference
  1. 王志弘 (2005) 記憶再現體制的構作:台北市官方城市書寫之分析,
    連結:
  2. 王志弘譯 (2002) 地租的藝術:全球化、壟斷與文化的商品化,發表
    連結:
  3. 王茜穎 (2006) 擬全球城市中心與邊陲的界線運作與穿越─以信義計
    連結:
  4. 畫區與基隆路整宅為個案,國立臺灣大學地理環境資源研究所碩
    連結:
  5. 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,1-82。
    連結:
  6. 周素卿、林潤華 (2008) 與世爭高:台北市高層建築生產的在地脈
    連結:
  7. 夏鑄九 (1994b) (重)建構公共空間─理論的反省,台灣社會研究季
    連結:
  8. 刊,16: 21-54.
    連結:
  9. 黃宗儀 (2004) 都市空間的生產:全球化的上海,台灣社會研究季
    連結:
  10. 刊,53: 61-83.
    連結:
  11. 顧玉玲 (2008) 我們:移動與勞動的生命記事,台北:印刻文學。
    連結:
  12. Connerton, P. (1989) 社會如何記憶,納日碧力戈譯,上海:人民
    連結:
  13. Dirlik, A. (2005) 建築與全球現代性、殖民主義以及地方,張歷君
    連結:
  14. Taipei 101),台北:采昌國際多媒體。
    連結:
  15. American Planning Association, 67 (1): 9-24.
    連結:
  16. Barker, C. (2003) Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice,
    連結:
  17. Consuming ethics: articulating the subjects and space
    連結:
  18. Barthes, R. (1964) The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies,
    連結:
  19. Bunnell, T. (1999) Views from above and below: the Petronas
    連結:
  20. Tropical Geography, 20 (1): 1-23.
    連結:
  21. Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, The
    連結:
  22. Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Oxford:
    連結:
  23. Charney, I. (2005) Reflections on the Post-WTC skyline:
    連結:
  24. Manhattan and elsewhere, International Journal of
    連結:
  25. Urban and Regional Research, 29 (1): 172-179.
    連結:
  26. Jersey: Prentice Hall, 127-164.
    連結:
  27. of Urban History, 14 (3): 321-345.
    連結:
  28. Douglass, M. (2006) The globalization of capital cities:
    連結:
  29. Taipei: Center for Asia-Pacific Area Studies. RCHSS,
    連結:
  30. University Press.
    連結:
  31. Durning, A. (1992) How Much is Enough? London: Earthscan.
    連結:
  32. Emporis Corporation (2004) Available from www.emporis.com.
    連結:
  33. Ford, L. R. (1992) Reading the skyline of American cities,
    連結:
  34. Ford, L. R. (1998) Midtowns, megastructures, and world
    連結:
  35. cities, Geographical Review, 88 (4): 528-547.
    連結:
  36. Ford, L. R. (2001) Skyscraper competition in Asia: new city
    連結:
  37. S. B. (eds.) Imaging the City: Continuing Struggles
    連結:
  38. and New Directions, New Brunswick, NJ: Center for
    連結:
  39. Urban Policy Research, 119-144.
    連結:
  40. of Urban and Regional Research, 6 (3): 309-345.
    連結:
  41. Gottmann, J. (1966) Why the skyscraper? Geographical
    連結:
  42. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    連結:
  43. Haila, A. (1998) The neglected builder of global cities.
    連結:
  44. Franzen, M. (eds.) Cities in Transformation-
    連結:
  45. Representations and Signifying Practices, London: Sage
    連結:
  46. association with the Open University.
    連結:
  47. Culture/ Cultures of Production, London: Sage in
    連結:
  48. association with the Open University.
    連結:
  49. Hartley, J. (1992) The Politics of Pictures: The Creation
    連結:
  50. of the Public in the Age of Popular Media, London:
    連結:
  51. Routledge.
    連結:
  52. Harvey, D. (1973) Social Justice and the City, Baltimore:
    連結:
  53. Johns Hopkins University Press.
    連結:
  54. Harvey, D. (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity: An
    連結:
  55. Harvey, D. (2000) Spaces of Hope, Berkeley: University of
    連結:
  56. Harvey, D. (2007) Neoliberalism as creative destruction,
    連結:
  57. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and
    連結:
  58. Social Science, 610 (21): 22-44.
    連結:
  59. Skyscrapers: Illusions of Open Space in Hong Kong,
    連結:
  60. Tokyo and Shanghai, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University
    連結:
  61. New York: New York University Press.
    連結:
  62. King, A. D. (1996) Worlds in the city: Manhattan transfer
    連結:
  63. Kotkin, J. (2002) The New Geography: How Digital Revolution
    連結:
  64. is Reshaping the American Landscape, New York: Random
    連結:
  65. Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space, Oxford:
    連結:
  66. Libby, B. (2002) Cesar Pelli. Available from www.salon.com.
    連結:
  67. Law, L. (2002) Defying disappearance: cosmopolitan public
    連結:
  68. announces design study for the World Trade Center site
    連結:
  69. and surrounding areas. Press Release, 14 August
    連結:
  70. (available from www.renewnyc.com).
    連結:
  71. Lynch, K. (1972) Openness of open spaces. In: Banerjee, T.
    連結:
  72. MIT Press, 396-412.
    連結:
  73. McNeill, D. (2005) Skyscraper geography, Progress in Human
    連結:
  74. Mills, E. (2002) Terrorism and U.S. real estate, Journal of
    連結:
  75. Urban Economics, (51): 198-204.
    連結:
  76. Mitchell, D. (1995) The end of public space? People’s
    連結:
  77. of the Association of American Geographers, 85 (1):
    連結:
  78. Mitchell, D. (2000) Cultural Geography: A Critical
    連結:
  79. Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.
    連結:
  80. National Building Museum (2001) The future of skyscrapers.
    連結:
  81. 9 November (available from www.nbm.org).
    連結:
  82. Norman, R. (ed.) Ethics and the Market, Aldershot:
    連結:
  83. Olds, K. (2001) Globalization and Urban Changes: Capital,
    連結:
  84. Paul, D. E. (2004) World cities as hegemonic projects: the
    連結:
  85. economy: on transnational migration, domestic work,
    連結:
  86. Sassen, S. (1996) Whose city is it? globalization and the
    連結:
  87. Sassen, S. (1998) Globalisation and Its Discontents, New
    連結:
  88. Sassen, S. (2000) Cities in a World Economy, 2nd ed.
    連結:
  89. Sassen, S. (2001) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo,
    連結:
  90. Princeton University Press.
    連結:
  91. Sassen, S. (2002) Global cities and survival circuits. In:
    連結:
  92. Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild, A. R. (eds.) Global
    連結:
  93. Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New
    連結:
  94. Sassen, S. (2007) A Sociology of Globalization, New York:
    連結:
  95. W.W. Norton.
    連結:
  96. Ethnicity, Capital and Culture in the 21st-Century
    連結:
  97. Sturken, M. and Cartwright, L. (2001) Practices of Looking:
    連結:
  98. An Introduction to Visual Culture, New York: Oxford UP.
    連結:
  99. TenantWise (2003) Available from www.tenantwise.com.
    連結:
  100. Woodward, K. (ed.) (1997) Identity and Difference, London:
    連結:
  101. Zukin, S. (1991) Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to
    連結:
  102. Disney World, Berkeley: University of California Press.
    連結:
  103. and New York as global financial capitals. In: Budd,
    連結:
  104. L. and Whimster, S. (eds.) Global Finance and
    連結:
  105. Urban Living: A Study of Metropolitan Change, London:
    連結:
  106. Routledge, 195-223.
    連結:
  107. Zukin, S. (2002) Our World Trade Center. In: Sorkin, M. and
    連結:
  108. Zukin, S. (eds.) After the World Trade Center:
    連結:
  109. Rethinking New York City, New York and London:
    連結:
  110. 台北市政府都市更新處
    連結:
  111. 2006最佳創新/商業模式讓國人都期待台北101跨年煙火 (2007),遠
  112. 見雜誌,2月1日版。
  113. 中外文學,33 (9): 10-52。
  114. 於世新大學蕭宗讓講座:「文化產業與消費-文化、經濟、後現
  115. 代」演講講稿,12月10日。
  116. 士論文。
  117. 台北101董事長陳敏薰像世界借光把台北點亮 (2007),遠見雜誌,5
  118. 月1日版。
  119. 台北101垂直城市1好3多 風水好,酷炫辦公室多、帥哥美女多、跨國
  120. 企業菁英多 (2007),工商時報,10月11日版。
  121. 成之約 (1998) 淺論「派遣勞動」及其對勞資關係的影響,就業與訓
  122. 練,16 (6): 52-56。
  123. 李清潭、楊斯琦、冷澤森 (2008) 企業非核心職務人力外包決策因素
  124. 及評估之探討,中華管理評論國際學報,11 (2): 1-24。
  125. 吳光庭、林芳怡 (1998) 創造高雄天空的翦影─訪李祖原建築師,建
  126. 築師,287: 70-71。
  127. 我很好強,要做就做到最好 (2004),e天下,12月1日版。
  128. 每坪60萬 金主買7戶 (2008),台灣蘋果日報,3月3日版。
  129. 周素卿 (2003) 全球化與新都心的發展:曼哈頓意象下的信義計畫
  130. 區,地理學報,34: 41-60。
  131. 周素卿 (2005) 新企業地景:華人全球城市高層建築的生產與再現,
  132. 絡,都市與計劃,35 (1): 1-28。
  133. 林建廷 (2006) 全球在地化之感官經驗及其文化表現:以「台北
  134. 101」與「閃亮三姐妹」為例,國立交通大學外國文學與語言研究
  135. 所碩士論文。
  136. 林靖傑 (2004) 台北幾米,向左走影像工作隊。
  137. 柴智屏 (2008) 這裡發現愛,台北:台灣觀光局。
  138. 夏鑄九 (1994a) 公共空間,行政院文化建設委員會/策劃出版,台
  139. 北:藝術家出版社/執行。
  140. 夏鑄九 (2004) 建築巨無霸,逢甲人月刊,141。
  141. 黃馨儀 (2005) Shopping體驗、Shopping文化:以台北101購物中心
  142. 為例,東吳大學社會學系碩士論文。
  143. 傅朝卿 (1999) 日治時期台灣建築1895-1945,台北:大地地理。
  144. 新西城,新國門 (都市更新篇) (2009),天下雜誌,433: 10。
  145. 龍蛇萬華起漲靠更新 (2007),台灣壹週刊,8月9日版。
  146. Cobb, H. (2004) 市民摩天樓─私有建築於公眾生活的反思,世界建
  147. 築,6。
  148. 出版社。
  149. COOL<2 ℃ 101秀密碼提倡減碳 (2008),聯合晚報,4月21日版。
  150. 譯,中外文學,34 (1): 24-44。
  151. Discovery (2007) 建築奇觀:台北101大樓 (Man Made Marvels -
  152. Banerjee, T. (2001) The future of public space: beyond
  153. invented streets and reinvented places, Journal of the
  154. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  155. Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N. and Malpass, A. (2005)
  156. of ethical consumption, Antipode, 37 (1): 23-45.
  157. New York: Hill and Wang.
  158. Twin Towers and/in contesting visions of development
  159. in contemporary Malaysia, Singapore Journal of
  160. Blackwell.
  161. Chen, L.-W. and Shih, C.-M. (2009) The public nature of
  162. high-rise buildings in Taiwan, Environment and
  163. Planning D: Society and Space, 27: 317-330.
  164. Crilley, D. (1993) Megastructures and urban change:
  165. aesthetics, ideology and design. In: Knox, P. (ed.)
  166. The Restless: Urban Landscape, Englewood Cliffs, New
  167. Domosh, M. (1988) The symbolism of the skyscraper case
  168. studies of New York’s first tall buildings, Journal
  169. civil society and neo-liberal state and the
  170. reconstruction of urban space in Asia Pacific. In: Ho,
  171. K.-C. and Hsiao, H.-H. M. (eds.) Globalization and
  172. Asia-Pacific Capital Cities: Primary and Diversity,
  173. Academic Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, 28-45.
  174. Douglass, M. and Jones, G. (2007) The Rise of Mega-Urban
  175. Regions in Pacific Asia, Singapore: Singapore
  176. Geographical Review, 82: 180-200.
  177. images and new city form. In: Vale, L. J. and Warner,
  178. Friedmann, J. and Wolff, G. (1982) World city formation: an
  179. agenda for research and action, International Journal
  180. Review, 56 (2): 190-212.
  181. Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the
  182. Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category, Cambridge,
  183. In: Kalltrop, O., Elander, I., Erisson, O. and
  184. Transformation in Cities: Social and Symbolic Change
  185. of Urban Space, Aldershot: Ashgate, 51-64.
  186. Hall, S. (ed.) (1997) Representation: Cultural
  187. Hall, S. and du Gay, P. (eds.) (1997) Production of
  188. Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Oxford:
  189. Blackwell.
  190. California Press.
  191. Huang, T.-Y. M. (2004) Walking Between Slums and
  192. Press.
  193. King, A. D. (1996) Re-Presenting the City: Ethnicity,
  194. Capital, and Culture in the 21st-Century Metropolis,
  195. and the ascendance of spectacular space, Planning
  196. Perspectives, (11): 97-114.
  197. King, A. D. (2004) Space of Global Culture: Architecture
  198. Urbanism Identity, London: Routledge.
  199. House.
  200. Blackwell.
  201. spaces in Hong Kong, Urban Studies, 39 (9): 1625-1645.
  202. LMDC (2002) Lower Manhattan Development Corporation
  203. and Southworth, M. (eds.) City Sense and City Design:
  204. Writings and Projects of Kevin Lynch, Cambridge, MA:
  205. Marston, S. (1990) Who are the people: gender, citizenship,
  206. and the making of the American nation, Environment and
  207. Planning D: Society and Space, 8: 449-458.
  208. Geography, 29 (1): 41-55.
  209. park, definitions of the public, and democracy, Annals
  210. 108-133.
  211. Newholm, T. (1999) Relocating the ethical consumer. In:
  212. Ashgate, 162-184.
  213. Culture and Pacific Rim Mega-Projects, London: Oxford
  214. University.
  215. politics of global imagineering in Montreal, Political
  216. Geography, 23: 571-596.
  217. Rodríguez, E. G. (2007) The “hidden side” of the new
  218. and unprecedented intimacy, Frontiers, 28 (3): 60-83.
  219. formation of new claims, Public Culture, 8 (2): 205-
  220. 223.
  221. York: New Press.
  222. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
  223. Economy, New York: Henry Holt and Company, 254-274.
  224. Shields, R. (1996) A guide to urban representation and what
  225. to do about it: alternative traditions of urban
  226. theory. In: King, A. D. (ed.) Re-Presenting the City:
  227. Metropolis, New York: New York University Press, 227-
  228. 252.
  229. Sage association with the Open University.
  230. Zukin, S. (1992) The city as a landscape of power: London
  231. Routledge, 13-22.
  232. 台北旅遊網
  233. http://www.taipeitravel.net/tw/mainpage.asp
  234. 台北市政府觀光傳播局
  235. http://www.tpedoit.taipei.gov.tw/
  236. http://www.uro.taipei.gov.tw/
  237. 台北101官方網
  238. http://www.taipei-101.com.tw/index.asp
  239. 交通部觀光局
  240. http://tourtaiwanyears.net/main1-5.htm
  241. 維基百科
  242. http://zh.wikipedia.org/
Times Cited
  1. 彭筱婷(2011)。凝視「台北101」:消費者與觀光客的實踐。淡江大學未來學研究所碩士班學位論文。2011。1-119。