Title

台北與上海BDSM實踐空間的情慾異托邦

Translated Titles

Lust of Heterotopia: BDSM Practice Spaces in Taipei and Shanghai

DOI

10.6342/NTU201904104

Authors

蔡博藝

Key Words

BDSM ; 異托邦 ; 空間生產 ; 情慾文化 ; 邊界工作 ; BDSM ; Heterotopia ; The production of space ; Lust ; Boundary work

PublicationName

臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2019年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

畢恆達

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本文從空間的視角切入,除了介紹作為與性和情慾有關的BDSM文化的基本知識和解釋BDSM的行為之外,將重點放在了介紹台北和上海這兩個商業性國際大都市的BDSM實踐空間現狀和社群發展歷史脈絡,並做出比較研究。 筆者借用Michel Foucault(1986)所提出的異托邦這一概念來描述這些在介於想像世界與現實世界之間的情慾空間,並借用了建築師Rem Koolhaas在1995年所寫的著作《S,M,L,XL》來建構BDSM的空間分類。 本文「S,M,L,XL」中的S對應小型的、私人性的空間,這些空間主要對應的行為是相對私密的調教,比如為實踐BDSM而改造的私人住宅、出租調教室、私人調教室。M對應的是相對公開或半公開的空間,主要對應的行為是BDSM聚會、課程等具有社群活動性質的空間。在L中,將主要探討這些BDSM實踐空間與所在城市的關係,從區位、都市文化、都市治理等層面去分析前述兩種空間與所在城市之間的關係。XL則從更宏觀的社會政治、經濟、文化去做分析和比較,探討BDSM作為一種次文化與主流文化和治理之間錯綜複雜、愛恨交織的關係。

English Abstract

The thesis describes the basic knowledge and practices of BDSM culture from spatial perspective. Besides, it focuses on spaces of practice and the historical context of the development of BDSM communities in Taipei and Shanghai. The concept of Heterotopia proposed by Michel Foucault was used to examine the erotic BDSM spaces which exist between the imaginary and real world. Moreover, BDSM spaces were classified into S, M, L, and XL inspired by Rem Koolhaas’s book. In this thesis, S among S, M, L, XL corresponds to small and private spaces where private discipline training was practiced. S spaces could be a private residence modified for BDSM practices, rental dungeons, or private BDSM themed rooms. M spaces are relatively public or semi-public spaces where social gatherings, courses, or shows were held. In the L section, the author examined the relationships between BDSM spaces and their metropolitan context in terms of location, urban culture, and urban governance. As the XL section, BDSM was seen as a subculture which had a complex and ambivalent relationship with mainstream culture from the social, cultural, and economic perspectives.

Topic Category 工學院 > 建築與城鄉研究所
工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
Reference
  1. Herman, RDK (2007). Playing with restraints: Space, citizenship and BDSM. In K. Browne, J. Lim, & G. Brown (Eds.), Geographies of sexualities: Theory, practices and politics (pp. 89-99). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  2. Larsson, V. (2017). BDSM: Practice. psychology. art. Litres.
  3. Foucault, M. & Miskowiec, J. (1986). Of other places. Diacritics, 16(1), 22-27.
  4. Foucault, M. (2008). Of other spaces (De Cauter, L. and Dehaene, M. Trans.). In Dehaene, M. and DeCauter, L. (eds), Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society (pp. 13-29). London:Routledge.
  5. Kelsey, K., Stiles, B. L., Spiller, L., & Diekhoff, G. M. (2013). Assessment of therapists’ attitudes towards BDSM. Psychology & Sexuality, 4, 255-276.
  6. Steinmetz, C. & Maginn, P. J. (2014). The landscape of BDSM venues A view from down under. Edited by MaginnP. J. & Steinmetz, C. (2014). (Sub)Urban sexscapes geographies and regulation of the sex industry (pp. 117-141).London: Routledge
  7. Weiss, M. (2011). Techniques of pleasure: BDSM and the circuits of sexuality.Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
  8. Tonnies, F. [1887] (1957). Community and society. Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
  9. Mulholland, M. (2011). When porno meets hetero. Australian Feminist Studies, 26(67), 119-135.
  10. Ummni Khan(2017).Fifty shades of ambivalence: BDSM representation in pop culture.
  11. Edited by Clarissa Smith,Feona Attwood,Brian McNair (2017). The Routledge Companion to Media, Sex and Sexuality (pp. 59-62) .London: Routledge
  12. 王琪君(2011)。《何處可以愉悅/逾越?性虐待文化社群的實踐與國家性公民身分》。國立臺灣大學新聞學研究所碩士論文。
  13. 李銀河(2002)《虐戀亞文化》。北京:友誼。
  14. 畢恆達(2001)《空間就是權力》。台北:心靈工坊。
  15. 張哲豪(2014)《「痛」快:看見台灣愉虐者》。國立臺灣大學新聞學研究所碩士論文。
  16. 楊淑玲、施俊名(2017)〈台灣地區民眾對BDSM之內隱與外顯態度研究〉。《性學研究》,7(2),35-62。
  17. 黃邦吉(2005)《QK開房間:解讀Motel風潮的休閒情欲文化的空間意涵》。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
  18. 黃詠梅(2008)《從「性虐待」到「皮繩愉虐邦」──考察台灣愉虐實踐的社群文化與集結政略》。東海大學社會學系碩士論文。
  19. 蕭翔鴻(2006)《陰性皮膜性快感-女性面具性嗜好之專論》台北:唐山。
  20. 王志弘(2016)。〈傅柯Heterotopia翻譯考〉。《地理研究》第65期,75-106。
  21. 高穎超(2016)《性腳本、性社會學與皮繩愉虐:追憶GAGNON》。巷仔口社會學。
  22. Bataille, G.(2012)《情色論》(賴守正譯)。台北:聯經。
  23. Sade, M. de.(2000)《臥房裡的哲學》(陳蒼多譯)。台北:新雨。
  24. Rubin, G.(1984)《關於性的思考:性政治學的激進筆記》(李銀河譯)北京:時事