Title

基金特性對基金績效在不同股市波動下之非線性探討

Translated Titles

The Nonlinear Effect of Fund Characteristics on Mutual Fund Performance under Different Stock Volatility

DOI

10.6846/TKU.2012.00404

Authors

鄭伊真

Key Words

基金績效 ; 基金特性 ; 股市波動 ; 非線 ; 縱橫平滑移轉迴歸模型 ; Mutual Fund Performance ; Fund Characteristics ; Stock Volatility ; Nonlinear ; Panel Smooth Transition Regression Model

PublicationName

淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2012年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

聶建中

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本研究運用Gonza′lez, Teräsvirta and van Dijk(2004, 2005)發展的縱橫平滑移轉迴歸模型進行實證分析,探究基金規模、基金週轉率、基金費用率等基金特性以及股市波動幅度是否在不同的股市波動幅度下對於基金績效的影響性產生變化。 研究發現當股市跌幅超過8.1461%時,基金規模與基金績效呈現顯著正向關係,基金費用率及股市波動幅度與基金績效為顯著負相關,但基金週轉率與基金績效之間並無相關性。當股票市場跌幅小於8.1461%或是出現漲幅時,只有基金規模與基金績效呈現顯著的正向關係,基金週轉率、基金費用率及股市波動幅度皆與基金績效為顯著負相關。因此歸納出的投資策略為,無論投資大眾預期股票市場的波動幅度為何,應挑選基金規模較大且基金週轉率與基金費用率皆較低的基金作為投資標的,以增進基金績效的表現。

English Abstract

This study is to investigate the panel smooth transition effect associated with fund characteristics and mutual fund performance. Utilizing the panel smooth transition regression model developed by Gonza′lez, Teräsvirta and van Dijk(2004, 2005)to figure out that fund size, turnover rate, fund expense ratio and stock volatility may affect mutual fund performance under different stock volatility. The result shows that when stock volatility falls above 8.1461 percent, there is a significant positive effect between fund size and fund performance, also fund expense ratio and stock volatility exist significant negative effect to fund performance, but fund expense ratio has no significant relationship with fund performance. When stock volatility falls below 8.1461 percent or climbs, only fund size has significant positive effect with fund performance, the others exist significant negative effect to fund performance. Consequently, investors could make decisions according to the result. No matter stock volatility climbs or falls, investors should choose funds with large size, lower turnover rate and lower fund expense ratio to increase fund performance.

Topic Category 商學院 > 財務金融學系碩士班
社會科學 > 財金及會計學
Reference
  1. 范相鈞,(2005),「應用多重比較方法評估台灣股票市場開放式共同基金績效」,國立成功大學統計研究所碩士論文
    連結:
  2. 洪鈞逸,(2010),「三因子及四因子資本資產定價模型之分析-台灣股票型基金之應用」,國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士論文
    連結:
  3. 蔡聰毓,(2008),「基金週轉率與績效之關係-以國內基金為例」,臺灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文
    連結:
  4. 劉維庭,(2009),「台灣股票型基金績效模式」,中原大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文
    連結:
  5. Admati, A. R. and Ross, S. A., (1985), “Measuring Investment Performance in a Rational Expectations Equilibrium Model, ” Journal of Business, Vol. 58, pp.1-25.
    連結:
  6. Andrews, D. W. K. and Ploberger, W., (1994), “Optimal Tests when S Nuisance Parameteris Present Only under the Altemative,” Econometrica, Vol. 62, pp.1383-1414.
    連結:
  7. Artikis, P., (2002), “Evaluation of Equity Mutual Funds Operating in the Greek Financial Market,” Managerial Finance, Vol. 28, pp.27-54.
    連結:
  8. Bodson, L., Cavenaile, L. and Sougné, D., (2011), “Does Size Affect Mutual Fund Performance? A General Approach”, Journal of Asset Management, Vol. 12, pp.163-171.
    連結:
  9. Bhargava, R., Bose, A. and Dubofsky, D. A., (1998), “Exploiting International Stock Market Correlations with Open-end International Mutual Funds,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 25, pp.765-773.
    連結:
  10. Busse, J. A., (1999), “Volatility Timing in Mutual Funds: Evidence from Daily Returns,” The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 12, pp.1009-1041.
    連結:
  11. Cao, B. and Jayasuriya, S. A., (2011), “Market Volatility and Hedge Fund Returns in Emerging Markets,” Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 21, pp.1691.
    連結:
  12. Carhart, M. M., (1997), “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, pp.57-82.
    連結:
  13. Christoffersen, S. E. K. and Sarkissian, S., (2011), “The Demographics of Fund Turnover,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 20, pp.414-440.
    連結:
  14. Daniel, K., Grinblatt, M., Titman, S. and Wermers, R., (1997), “Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristic Based Benchmarks,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, pp.1035-1058.
    連結:
  15. Dowd, K., (1999), “A Value Risk Approach to Risk-return Analysis,” Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 25, pp.60-67.
    連結:
  16. Droms, W. G. and Walker, D. A., (1994), “Investment Performance of International Mutual Funds,” Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 17, pp.1-14.
    連結:
  17. Dybvig, P. H. and Ross, S. A., (1985), “The Analytics of Performance Measurement Using a Security Market Line,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, pp.401-416.
    連結:
  18. Fama, E. F. and French, K. R., (1993), “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Bonds and Stocks,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33, pp.3-56.
    連結:
  19. Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S., (1989), “Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio Holdings,” The Journal of Business, Vol. 62, pp.393-393.
    連結:
  20. Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S., (1994), “A Study of Monthly Mutual Fund Returns and Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 29, pp.419-444.
    連結:
  21. Hansen, B. E., (1996), “Inference when A Nuisance Parameter is not Identified under the Null Hypothesis,” Econometrica, Vol. 64, pp.413-430.
    連結:
  22. Hansen, B. E., (1999), “Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 93, pp.345-368.
    連結:
  23. Haslem, J. A., Baker, H. K. and Smith, D. M., (2008), “Performance and Characteristics of Actively Managed Retail Equity Mutual Funds with Diverse Expense Ratios,” Financial Services Review, Vol. 17, pp.49-68.
    連結:
  24. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. and Shin, Y., (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 115, pp.53-74.
    連結:
  25. Indro, D. C., Jiang, C. X., Hu, M. Y. and Lee, W. Y., (1999), “Mutual Fund Performance: Does Fund Sizes Matter?” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 55, pp.74-87.
    連結:
  26. Jensen, M. C., (1968), “The Performance of Mutual Funds in the period 1945-1964,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, pp.385-416.
    連結:
  27. Jansen, E. S. and Teräsvirta, T., (1996), “Testing Parameter Constancy and Super Exogeneity in Econometric Equations,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 58, pp.735-763.
    連結:
  28. Kon, S. J. and Jen, F. C., (1979), “The Investment Performance of Mutual Funds: An Empirical Investigation of Timing, Selectivity, and Market Efficiency”, Journal of Business, Vol. 52, pp.263-289.
    連結:
  29. Lehman, B. and Modest, D., (1987), “Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation: A Comparison of Benchmarks and Benchmark Comparisons,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, pp.233-265.
    連結:
  30. Levin, A. and Lin, C. F., (1992), “Unit Roots Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-sample Properties,” University of California, San Diego
    連結:
  31. Levin, A., Lin, C. F. and Chu, C., (2002), “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-sample Properties,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 108, pp.1-24.
    連結:
  32. Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P. and Teräsvirta, T., (1988), “Testing Linearity against Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models,” Biometrika, Vol. 75, pp.491-499.
    連結:
  33. Maddala, G. S. and Wu, S., (1999), “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 61, pp.631-652.
    連結:
  34. Matallín-Sáez, J.C., (2011), “On Causality in the Size-efficiency Relationship: the Effect of Investor Cash Flows on the Mutual Fund Industry,” Applied Economics, Vol. 43, pp.4069.
    連結:
  35. Moses, E. A., Cheyney, J. M. and Veit, E. T., (1987), “A New and More Complete Performance Measure,” Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 13, pp.24-33.
    連結:
  36. Prather, L., Bertin, W. J. and Henker, T., (2004), “Mutual Fund Characteristics, Managerial Attributes, and Fund Performance,” Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, pp.305-326.
    連結:
  37. Sharpe, W. F., (1966), “Mutual Fund Performance,” Journal of Business, Vol. 39, pp.119-138.
    連結:
  38. Sortino, F. A. and Price, L. N., (1994),” Performance Measurement in a Downside Risk Framework,” Journal of Investing, Vol. 3, pp.59-64
    連結:
  39. Teräsvirta, T., (1994), “Specification, Estimation, and Evaluation of Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 89, pp.208-218.
    連結:
  40. Treynor, J. L., (1965), “How to Rate Management of Investment Funds,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 43, pp.63-75.
    連結:
  41. Treynor, J. L. and Black, F., (1973), “How to Use Security Analysis to Improve Portfolio Selection,” Journal of Business, Vol. 46, pp.66.
    連結:
  42. Yan, X., (2008), “Liquidity, Investment Style, and the Relation between Fund Size and Fund Performance,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 43, pp.741.
    連結:
  43. 一、中文文獻
  44. 王怡文,(2010),「總體經濟指標對股市及共同基金相關性之研究-以台灣股市為例」,國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文
  45. 林潔霞,(2011),「影響共同基金績效因素之研究」,國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文
  46. 郭怡青,(2011),「共同基金績效評估-擇時能力之探討」,國立高雄應用科技大學金融資訊研究所碩士論文
  47. 唐群雅,(2011),「台灣開放型股票基金績效與特性分析」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文
  48. 陳姿縈,(2011),「共同基金績效研究 -以台灣開放式股票型基金為例」,長庚大學工商管理學研究所碩士論文
  49. 張儷馨,(2011),「基金績效實證研究及其相關特性因素之探討」,雲林科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文
  50. 蔡幸芬,(2004),「共同基金類型與大盤指數長期關係之研究及衝擊反應」,東吳大學經濟研究所碩士論文
  51. 二、英文文獻
  52. Alaganar, V. T. and Whiteoak, J., (2004), “Market Volatility and Performance of Australian Equity Funds,” JASSA, pp.12-15.
  53. Droms, W. G. and Walker, D. A., (1996), “Mutual Fund Investment Performance,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 36, pp.347-363.
  54. González, A., Teräsvirta, T. and van Dijk, D., (2004), “Panel Smooth Transition Regression Model and an Application to Investment under Credit Constraints,” Working papers
  55. González, A., Teräsvirta, T. and van Dijk, D., (2005), “Panel Smooth Transition Regression Models,” Working papers
  56. Gorman, L., (1991), “A Study of the Relationship between Mutual Fund Return and Asset Size, 1974-1987,” Akron Business and Economic Review, Vol. 22, pp.53-61.
  57. Granger, C. W. J. and Teräsvirta, T., (1993), “Modeling Nonlinear Economic Relationships,” Oxford University Press
  58. Lundbergh, S., Teräsvirta, T. and van Dijk, D., (2003), “Time-varying Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 21, pp.104-121.
  59. Peterson, J. D. and Riepe, M. W., (2007), “Does the Turnover of an Equity Mutual Fund Matter?” Journal of Financial Planning, Vol. 20, pp.32-33.
  60. Smith, Keith V. and Tito, Dennis A., (1969), “Risk-return Measures of Ex-post Portfolio Performance,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 4, pp.449-471.
  61. Teräsvirta, T., (1998), “Modeling Economic Relationships With Smooth Transition Regressions,” in Handbook of applied economic statistic, ed. by A. Ullah and D. E. A. Giles, pp.507-552.
  62. Treynor, J. L. and Mazuy, K. K., (1966), “Can Mutual Fund Outguess the Market,” Harvard Business Review, pp.131-135.
Times Cited
  1. 陳景棋(2013)。基金特性對基金規模在不同基金經理人費用變化下之非線性探討。淡江大學財務金融學系碩士在職專班學位論文。2013。1-46。 
  2. 郭萬定(2015)。從投信經營管理者角度探討台灣共同基金存活。中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班學位論文。2015。1-51。 
  3. 詹世澤(2013)。基金費用率對基金績效之關聯性分析。臺北大學國際財務金融碩士在職專班學位論文。2013。1-61。