Title

歐洲聯盟消費者政策發展之研究-以商品安全為例

Translated Titles

An Approach on the Development of Consumer Policy of The European Union - Case Study of Product Safety

Authors

謝宗曄

Key Words

消費者保護 ; 歐洲聯盟消費者政策 ; 商品安全 ; 通用產品安全規範 ; 瑕疵產品責任規範 ; Consumer Protection ; Consumer Policy of the European Union ; Product Safety ; General Product Safety Directive ; Product Liability Directive

PublicationName

淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2007年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

苑倚曼

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

歐洲聯盟於消費者保護政策之作為,於羅馬條約時期尚未將消費者權益保護議題納入條文規範中,進而發展至歐洲聯盟條約內設立了「消費者保護」獨立章節,亦規定其制訂相關消費者保護法令之依據。其主要變因皆是歐洲各國對消費者主權意識之覺醒,各界學者專家以及消費者保護團體不斷地在社會各階層推波助瀾,才促使歐盟機關訂立保障消費者權益之相關立法。本論文特別以商品安全(Product Safety)為歐盟消費者政策執行成效之案例,藉由,歐盟於商品安全規範所訂立之通用產品安全指令以及瑕疵產品責任指令,作為歐盟管制進入共同市場流通之產品安全標準,以及瑕疵產品損害消費者利益時之責任歸屬規範,並評斷歐盟執行消費者政策之效力。最後,則以歐盟未來將實施之「2007-2013健康與消費者保護計劃」,說明其將執行之範疇以及措施,並提出相關之消費者保護團體之評論,最後說明歐盟消費者政策面對科技快速發展之社會,如何因應消費者權益之永續保障,以及即將面臨的未來挑戰。

English Abstract

The European Union achievement in the consumer protection policy, from the Roman Treaty period, the protection of consumer rights and interests was not a subject in the article. Until 1992, the European Union treaty set up the independent chapter “Consumer Protection”, also has basis of its making correlation law. The primary cause is the European countries to awakening of the consumer sovereignty consciousness. The scholar experts and the consumer protection organizations, who unceasingly impel the consumer sovereignty in the social various social strata. Urges European Union Institution to work out the relevant legislation which ensures consumer's rights and interests. The present paper specially takes the “product safety” as a case study, in order to carry out the result of the effect, which the consumer policy of European Union has down. Take European Union’s “General Product Safety Directive” and “Product Liability Directive” as product safety specifications. As the standard which the product have to follow as the passport to enter European common market. And also be the Responsibility Ascertainment Principles for Tort Liability, when the defect products are harmful to interests of consumer. At the end of this thesis, present the future action plan of the European Union “Health and Consumer Protection Programme 2007-2013”, will explain its category of the measures and the executions. Some consumer protection ogranisations make a lot of commentaries and suggestions about the future action plan. To develop the consumer protection policy of European Union, there are lots of difficulties and challenges. European Union has to face those challenges and continues forever in accordance to the consumer rights and interests to safeguard.

Topic Category 人文學 > 人類學及族群研究
國際研究學院 > 歐洲研究所碩士班
Reference
  1. 16. 楊鳳春,「消費者政治學」,(台北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司,1999年)。
    連結:
  2. 17. 劉春堂,「消費者保護叢書之四 消費者保護與消費者法」,(台北:行政院消費者保護委員會,1996年)。
    連結:
  3. 3. Holland, Debra, (1999) European Consumer Law, (Sudbury Suffolk : Monitor Press Limited).
    連結:
  4. 6. Jones, Mary G. & Gardner, David M., (1976) Consumerism: A New Force in Society, (Lexington, Mass : Lexington Books).
    連結:
  5. 10. Moussis, Nicholas, (1998) Handbook of European Union: Institutions and policies, (Belgium: European Study Service).
    連結:
  6. 2. Arndt, Johan, Crame, Edgar and Tallhang, Knut, (1977) “Opinions Arndt Consumerism Issuer Among Present and Future Norweigian Business Executives”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.1, November, 1977.
    連結:
  7. 3. Brack, Antoni, (1999) “The CE-mark and the New European approach to product law: a system of fundamental legal safety requirements and technical specification standards”, International Journal for Consumer & Product Safety, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1999, pp.45-59.
    連結:
  8. 4. Buskirk, Richard H. & Rothe, James T., (1970) “Consumerism An Interpretation”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 34, October, 1970, pp.61-65.
    連結:
  9. 6. Clarke, Sally H., (2005) “Unmanageable Risks: MacPherson v. Buick and the Emergence of a Mass Consumer Market”, Law and History Review, Vol.23, No.1, 2005, pp.1-52.
    連結:
  10. 7. Cravens, David W. & Mills, Gerald E., (1970) “Consumerism, A Perspective for Business”, Business Horizons, vol. 13, issue 4, 1970, pp. 21-28.
    連結:
  11. 8. Goyens, Monique, (1992) “Consumer Protection in a Single European Market: What Challenge for the EC Agenda?” , Common Market Law Review, Vol.29, 1992, pp.71-92.
    連結:
  12. 14. Micklitz, Hans- W. & Weatherill, Stephen, (1993) “Consumer policy in the European Community: Before and After Maastricht”, Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol.16, No. 3/4, 1993, pp.285 -322.
    連結:
  13. 18. Weatherill, Stephen, (1991) “Reinvigorating the Development of Community Product Safety Policy”, Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 14, 1991, pp.171-194.
    連結:
  14. 2. ANEC, “Programme of Community action in the field of Health and Consumer Protection 2007-2013”, Comment, 16 November 2005.
    連結:
  15. 1. 中華民國消費者文教基金會
    連結:
  16. 2. 行政院消費者保護委員會
    連結:
  17. 3. 美國消費商品安全委員會U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
    連結:
  18. 10. European Association for Injury Prevention and safety Promotion
    連結:
  19. 參考文獻
  20. 中文資料
  21. 一. 中文書籍
  22. 1. 王世洲(主編),「歐洲共同體法律的制定與執行」,(台北:法律出版社,2000年1月)。
  23. 2. 朱柏松,「消費者保護法論」,(台北,翰蘆圖書出版有限公司,1999年,增訂版)。
  24. 3. 任克敏,「區域發展理論 - 歐聯產品的標準化」,(台北:五南圖書出版公司,2001年)。
  25. 4. 李伸一,「消費者保護法論」,(台北,凱侖出版社,1995年)。
  26. 5. 周宇,「消費者保護之研究」,(台北:台灣學生學局,1976年)。
  27. 6. 林益山,「消費者保護法」,(台北,五南圖書出版有限公司,1994年)。
  28. 7. 洪德欽、沈玄池 (主編),「歐洲聯盟:理論與政策」,(台北:中央研究院歐美研究所,1998年)。
  29. 8. 洪德欽 (主編),「歐洲聯盟經貿政策」,(台北:中央研究院歐美研究所,2000年)。
  30. 9. 徐聯恩,「當前台灣保護消費者運動對企業行銷活動影響之研究」,(政治大學,企管研究所碩士論文,1982年6月)。
  31. 10. 張福昌,「邁向歐洲聯盟之路」,(台北:三民書局股份有限公司,2002年)。
  32. 11. 陳鴻建,「歐洲共同體引人錯誤廣告規範之研究」,(淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文,1999年)。
  33. 12. 陳麗娟(譯),「阿姆斯特丹條約解讀」,(台北:五南圖書出版公司,1999年)。
  34. 13. 陳麗娟,「歐洲共同體法導論」,(台北:五南圖書出版公司,1996年)。
  35. 14. 陶在樸,「歐洲共同體透視」,(台北:五南圖書出版有限公司,1993年)。
  36. 15. 馮震宇等合著,「消費者保護法解讀」,(台北:元照出版公司,2005年)。
  37. 二. 中文期刊
  38. 1. 李勰,「從歐盟修改打火機標準案-淺析歐盟工業品標準體系」,世界機電經貿信息,(第11期,2002年),頁49-53。
  39. 2. 孫波,「論美國產品責任法的幾個重大突破」,國家檢察官學院學報,(第2期,2001年)。
  40. 3. 孫波,「試論英國產品責任法」,前沿,(第2期,2001年)。
  41. 4. 殷兆龍,「國外產品責任法對幾個重要問題的規定(上)」,世界標準化與質量管理,(第2期,1994年),頁2-4。
  42. 5. 殷兆龍,「國外產品責任法對幾個重要問題的規定(下)」,世界標準化與質量管理,(第3期,1994年),頁13-14。
  43. 6. 張維邦,「歐洲整合的意涵與模式」,新世紀智庫論壇, (第13期,2001年3月),頁24-35。
  44. 7. 陳光權,「產品加施歐盟CE標誌的基本方法、步驟及有關問題」,製造技術與機床,(第12期,2004年),頁29-36。
  45. 8. 陳淑梅,「CE標誌-產品進入歐盟市場的通行証」,世界標準化與質量管理,(第1期,2003年),頁20-23。
  46. 9. 陳麗娟,「歐洲共同體CE標示規定之研究」,進口救濟論叢,(第9期,1996年),頁33-52。
  47. 10. 黃宏全,「美國消費者保護業務簡介-FTC、CPSC及DCA」,消費者保護研究-第七輯,(2001年9月),頁191-200。
  48. 11. 敦一民,「產品責任法淺議」,河北法學,(第2期,1999年)。
  49. 12. 劉洪波,「歐美產品責任法概述」,經濟管理學院學報,(第2期,2003年6月),頁53-57。
  50. 13. 劉春堂,「論商品之瑕疵」,法律與當代社會-馬漢寶教授七秩榮慶論文集,(1996年7月),頁288-307。
  51. 外文資料
  52. 一. 西文書籍
  53. 1. Heusel, Wolfgang, (1999) Le nouveau droit des contrats et la protection des consommateurs: Concepts de la réglementation communatutaire et leurs conséquences pour le droit civil national, (Köln : Bundesanzeiger Verlagsges).
  54. 2. Howells, Geraint & Wilhelmsson, Thomas, (1997) EC Consumer Law, (London : Ashgate).
  55. 4. Hodges, Christopher J. S., (2005) European Regulation of Consumer Product Safety, (Oxford : Oxford University Press).
  56. 5. Hirst, I. R. C. & Reekie, W. Duncan, (1977) The Consumer Society (London : Tavistok).
  57. 7. Kendall, Vivienne, (1994) EC Consumer Law, (London : Chancery Law Publishing Ltd.).
  58. 8. Lawlor, Eamonn, (1988) Individual choice and higher growth: The task of European consumer policy, (Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  59. 9. Lawlor, Eamonn, (1989) Individual choice and higher growth: The aim of consumer policy in the single market, (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  60. 11. Nebbia, Paolisa & Askham, Tony, (2004) EU Consumer Law, (London : Richmond Law & Tax Ltd.).
  61. 12. Plender, Richard & Wilderspin, Michael, (2001) The European Contracts Convention: the Rome Convention of the Choice of Law for Contracts, (London : Sweet & Maxwell ) .
  62. 13. Schulze, Reiner, & Jones, Jackie, (2002) A casebook on European Consumer Law, (Oxford : Hart Publishing).
  63. 14. Weatherill, Stephen, (1997) EC Consumer Law and Policy, (London : Longman).
  64. 二. 西文期刊
  65. 1. Aaker, Davide A. & Day, George S., (1982) “A Guide to Consumerism”, Free Press, 1982, pp.7-14.
  66. 5. Caedeke, Ralph M., (1969) “Consumerism in the 1960’s: A Study of the Development of , Under Buying Reasons for , and Business Reaction to Today’s Consumer Protection Movement”, University of Washington Press, 1969.
  67. 9. Howells, Gerain, (1993) “Comparative Product Liability”, Dartmouth, 1993, pp.109-119.
  68. 10. Keller and Heckman, (2004) “The Revised EU General Product Safety Directive and the EU Product Liability Directive: Considerations for Global Consumer Product Manufacturers”, Keller and Heckman LLP, May, 2004, pp.1-8.
  69. 11. Kolter, Philip, (1972) “What Consumerism Means for Marketers”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 50, May, 1972, pp.48-57.
  70. 12. Kyprianou, Markos, (2006) “World Consumer Day 2006”, Health & Consumer Voice, March 2006, pp.1-5.
  71. 13. Kutin, Breda, (2005) “Consumer protection in an enlarged Europe”, Consumer Policy Review, Sep/Oct 2005, pp.198-202.
  72. 15. Nazerali, Fulie & Dee, Foanne, (1997) “The UK “Development Risks” Defense: A Product of the Commission’s Imagination?”, Business Law Review, December, 1997.
  73. 16. Orban, Frank A., (1978) “Product Liability: A Comparative Legal Restatement – Foreign National Law and EEC Directive”, University of Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law, vol. 8, 1978, pp.342-406.
  74. 17. Wassermann, Ursula, (1973) “Council of Europe-Consumer Protection”, Journal of World Trade Law, (1973)
  75. 歐盟及消費者保護組織官方暨網路新聞資料
  76. 1. AMCHAM EU, “Position Paper on the Programme of Community Action in the Field of Health and Consumer Protection”, Brussels: AMCHAM EU, 5 October 2005.
  77. http://www.eucommittee.be/Pops/2005archive/programmeofcommunityactioninthefieldofhealth10052005.pdf
  78. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_overview/Documents/com_2005_0115_en.pdf
  79. 3. ANEC, “ANEC comment on the role and significance of the CE marking”, Draft, 27 September 2005.
  80. http://www.anec.org/attachments/ga037-05.pdf
  81. 4. ANEC, Fabisch, Gottlobe, “Market Surveillance in practice seen from a consumer perspective”, Speech, 2 March 2005.
  82. http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_safe/prod_safe/gpsd/am8.ppt#1
  83. 5. ANEC, Fabisch, Gottlobe, “Market Surveillance: Expectations and concerns of consumer associations”, Speech, 8 November 2004.
  84. http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_org/assembly/workshop_fabisch_en.pdf
  85. 6. ANEC, “ANEC comment on the European Commission’s Consultation Paper: Safety of Services for Consumers”, Comment, 8 October 2002.
  86. http://www.anec.org/attachments/Co041-02.pdf
  87. 7. BEUC, “Programme d’action communautaire dans le domaine de la santé et de la protection des consommateurs 2007-2013”, Prise de position, 4 October 2005.
  88. 8. CIAA, “Commitments for 2006 to drive action within the framework of the EU Platform for action on Diet, Physical Activity and Health”, Brussels: CIAA, 23 November 2005. http://www.ciaa.be/documents/positions/CIAA_Commitments_EU_Platform_Diet_Physical_Activity_Health.pdf
  89. 9. Commission of the European Communities, (1992) Completing the Internal Market, A New Community Standards Policy, (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1992)
  90. 10. Commission of the European Communities, (1998) The Impact of Community law on the domestic legal systems of the Member States Consumer Law, (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1998)
  91. 11. CPSC, (1992) What We do, (New York: Consumer Product Safety Commission, 1992)
  92. 12. EPHA, Nyebak, Sidsela, “New Health and Consumer Protection Programme 2007-2013”, Briefing, August 2005.
  93. http://www.epha.org/single_page.php3?id_mot=134
  94. 13. EURO COOP, “Position on the Consumer Strategy 2002-2006”, Brussels: EURO COOP, 20 August 2006.
  95. http://www.eurocoop.org/publications/en/position/consumerstrategy200206.asp
  96. 14. Eurostat, “Consumers in Europe Facts and figures: Data 1999-2004”, European Commission, 2005.
  97. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-DY-04-001/EN/KS-DY-04-001-EN.PDF
  98. 15. Health and Consumer Protection DG, “RAPEX statistics (1st January -31th August 2006)”, European Commission, 15 September 2006.
  99. 16. Health and Consumer Protection DG, “Annual Report on the operation of the Rapid Alert System for non-food consumer products (RAPEX) 2005”, European Commission, January 2006.
  100. http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/reports/report_rapex_05_en.pdf
  101. 17. Health and Consumer Protection DG, “Annual Report on the operation of the Rapid Alert System for non-food consumer products (RAPEX) 2004”, European Commission, January 2005.
  102. http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/reports/report_rapex_04_en.pdf
  103. 18. James, Scott M., “How the US and EU Handle Consumer Product Safety Issues”, Faegre & Benson LLP, September, 2006. http://www.faegre.com/articles/article_1682.aspx
  104. 19. James, Scott M., “The Curious Development of the EU Product Liability Directive”, Faegre & Benson LLP, September, 2006. http://www.faegre.com/articles/article_1999.aspx
  105. 網路資料
  106. http://www.consumers.org.tw/
  107. http://www.cpc.gov.tw/
  108. http://www.cpsc.gov/
  109. 4. 歐盟消費者議題網頁
  110. http://europa.eu/pol/cons/index_en.htm
  111. 5. 歐盟健康消費者保護總署DG Health and Consumer Protection
  112. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/index_en.htm
  113. 6. 歐洲標準化消費者之聲The European consumer voice in standardization(ANEC)
  114. http://www.anec.org/anec.asp?lang=en&ref=00-00
  115. 7. 歐洲消費者聯盟The European Consumers’ Organisation(BEUC)
  116. http://www.beuc.org/Content/Default.asp?PageID=102
  117. 8. 歐洲消費者合作社European community of consumer cooperatives(EuroCoop)
  118. http://www.eurocoop.org/home/en/default.asp
  119. 9. Confédération des Organisations Familiales de l'Union Européenne(Coface)
  120. http://www.coface-eu.org/public/html/coface.html
  121. http://www.eurosafe.eu.com/csi/eurosafe2006.nsf