Title

動能投資策略-以國內股票型基金為例

Translated Titles

Momentum Strategy : Using Taiwan’s Open-end Equity Funds as an example

DOI

10.6846/TKU.2012.00437

Authors

吳哲嘉

Key Words

動能策略 ; 股票型基金 ; Momentum Strategy ; Open-end Equity Funds

PublicationName

淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2012年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

顧廣平

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本研究參考Jegadeesh and Titman (1993)的方法,並以基金過去報酬、夏普指標、簡森指標、崔納指標和資訊比率,當作建立投資組合的主要指標。觀察在不同指標組合及不同持有期間下之動能策略的平均報酬率。實證發現,國內的股票型基金確實存在動能效應,投資者可以透過動能策略建立投資組合並得到顯著大於零的平均報酬,但此效果會隨著時間而減弱。 在單因子動能策略中,所有指標的績效持續性都至少存在一年,此外除了過去3年報酬率(ROI 36)以外的指標,甚至可長達兩年之久。而在二因子動能策略下,大多數組合都能有一年以上的績效持續性。研究發現,在多考慮一種指標後,將有助於平均報酬率的提升,平均報酬率增加的幅度依然會有遞減的情形出現,但卻無法提升績效的持續性,在某些組合反而會使績效的持續性減弱。最後本研究建議,在建立動能策略投資策略時應該同時考慮並且慎選兩種指標,雖然在績效持續性方面的幫助不大,卻能有效提升投資組合的平均報酬率。

English Abstract

Employed the Price Momentum Strategy of Jegadeesh and Titman (1993), this study takes pass return of mutual fund, Sharp ratio, Jensen index, Treynor index and Information ratio as major indicators of investment portfolios to investigate the average return of momentum strategy under these portfolios with different holding periods. The empirical results show that there exists the momentum strategy in Taiwan’s equity fund market. Investors can get a significant positive average return by setting up their investment portfolio using the momentum strategy; however, this effect will be declined with time. Under the one way strategy, the performance persistence of all indicators exists at least for one year; with this strategy, the effect can even be lasted for two years, except for the Return on Investment 36 (ROI 36),. For the two way strategies, most of the portfolios’ performance persistence can be kept for one year and above. The study, in one hand, indicates that the two way strategies has better average return compared to the one way strategy; nevertheless, the increasing magnitude in average return can also be declined in some cases. In the other hand, it also exhibits that the two way strategies do not help to improve the performance persistence, but in some investment portfolios, deteriorates their performance persistence instead. Finally, the study suggests that one should consider choosing two way strategies when constructing an investment portfolio under the momentum strategy. Although it does not benefit much in performance persistence, but do help improving the average return of investment portfolio.

Topic Category 商學院 > 財務金融學系碩士班
社會科學 > 財金及會計學
Reference
  1. 1.王明昌、 朱榕屏和王弘志,2010,「台灣股市不存在中期動能效應?」,東吳經濟商學學報,第68期,頁91-120。
    連結:
  2. 2.李存修,黃思綺,林榕芳、蔡維哲,2011,「績效和流量交互影響下的基金動能投資策略在台灣市場的效果」,管理學報,第 28卷第2期,頁191 -218。
    連結:
  3. 9.高蘭芬、陳安琳、湯惠雯、曹美蘭,2005 ,共同基金績效之衡量-模擬分析法之應用,中山管理評論,第13卷第3期,頁667 -694 。
    連結:
  4. 10.郭維裕、李愷莉,2006,「台灣共同基金短期績效持續性的研究-以“漂移者-停駐者”模型為例」,經濟論文, 34卷4期(2006/12),34卷4期,頁469 -504。
    連結:
  5. 11.陳相宇,2005,國內上市型開放式股票型基金績效持續性實證研究,國立臺灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  6. 12.陳美雯,2007,共同基金績效評估與持續性分析,國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  7. 1.Allen, D. E., & Tan, M. L. (1999). A test of the persistence in the performance of UK managed funds. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26(5), 559-593.
    連結:
  8. 2.Brown, S. J., & Goetzmann, W. N. (1995). Performance persisitence. Journal of Finance, 50(2), 679-698.
    連結:
  9. 3.Bollen, N. P., & Busse, J. A. (2005). Short-term persistence in mutual fund performance. Review of Financial Studies, 18(2), 569-597.
    連結:
  10. 5.Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
    連結:
  11. 7.Chih, H. H., Lin, Y. E. & Chou, P. H. (2006). Performance persistence and smart money effect: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Management, 24(3), 307-330.
    連結:
  12. 8.Droms, W. G. & Walker, D. A. (2001). Performance persistence of international mutual funds. Global Financial Journal, 12(2), 237-248.
    連結:
  13. 9.Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., & Blake, C. R. (1996). Fundamental economic variables, expected returns, and bond fund performance. Journal of Finance, 50(4), 1229-1255.
    連結:
  14. 11.Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1992). The persistence of mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 47(5), 1977-1984.
    連結:
  15. 12.Goetzmann, W. N., & Ibbotson, R. G. (1994). Do winners repeat? Journal of Portfolio Management, 20(2), 9-18
    連結:
  16. 13.Hendricks, D., Patel, J., & Zeckhauser, R. (1993). Hot hands in mutual funds: Short-run persistence of relative performance, 1974-1988. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 93-130.
    連結:
  17. 14.Hameed, A., & Yuanto, K. (2002). Momentum strategies: Evidence from Pacific Basin stock markets. Journal of Financial Research, 25(3), 383−397.
    連結:
  18. 15.Hsu, P., Hsu, Y., & Kuan, C. (2010). Testing the predictive ability of technical analysis using a new stepwise test without data snooping bias. Journal of Empirical Finance, 17(3), 471-484.
    連結:
  19. 16.Jensen, M. C. (1969). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964. Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389-416.
    連結:
  20. 17.Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.
    連結:
  21. 18.Jan, Y. C. & Hung, M. W., (2004). Short-run and long-run persistence in mutual funds. Journal of Investing, 13(1), 67-71.
    連結:
  22. 19.Levy, R. (1967). Relative strength as a criterion for investment selection. Journal of Finance, 22(4), 595-610.
    連結:
  23. 20.Malkiel, B. G. (1995). Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971 to 1991. Journal of Finance, 50(2), 549-572.
    連結:
  24. 21.Prather, L., Bertin, W. J., & Henker, T. (2004). Mutual fund characteristics managerial attributes and fund performance. Review of Financial Economics, 13(4), 305-326.
    連結:
  25. 22.Rouwenhorst, K. G. (1999). Local return factors and turnover in emerging stock markets. Journal of Finance, 54(4), 1439-1464.
    連結:
  26. 23.Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business (Pre-1986), 39(1), 119-138.
    連結:
  27. 24.Schiereck, D., & Weber, M. (1999). Contrarian and momentum strategies in Germany. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(6), 104-116.
    連結:
  28. 25.Volkman, D. A., & Wohar, M. E. (1995). Determinants of persistence in relative performance of mutual funds. Journal of Financial Research, 18(4), 415-430.
    連結:
  29. 中文文獻
  30. 3.林美齡,2005,海外基金動能策略之實證研究 ,國立高雄第一科技大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
  31. 4.林柏衡,2007,四因子模型下共同基金績效持續性與動能策略之研究,國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
  32. 5.林淑貞,2011,得獎基金績效持續性研究-以國內共同基金為例,國立高雄第一科技大學風險管理與保險系研究所論文。
  33. 6.邱子軒,2011,共同基金績效與持續性檢定共同基金績效與持續性檢定:Step:Step-SPA,國立高雄應用科技大學金融資訊研究所碩士論文。
  34. 7.張鈞翔,2008,台灣共同基金市場動能效應之研究,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
  35. 8.張至中,2010,共同基金持股數目、產業集中度與資訊含量對基金績效影響之研究,國立台灣科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
  36. 13.傅善恆,2009,台灣地區股票型共同基金績效短期持續性之研究,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
  37. 英文文獻
  38. 4.Chan, L. K. C., Jegadeesh, N., & Lakonishok, J. (1996). Momentum strategies. Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1681-1713.
  39. 6.Cooper, M. J., Guthierrez, R. C., JR, & Hameed, A. (2004). Market states and momentum. Journal of Finance, 59(3), 1345-1365.
  40. 10.Fletcher, J., & Forbes, D. (2002). U.K. unit trust performance: Does it matter which benchmark or measure is used? Journal of Financial Services Research, 21(3), 195-218.
Times Cited
  1. 黃筠珺(2018)。流動性與VIX指數對股市動能策略市場之研究。中原大學財務金融研究所學位論文。2018。1-72。