English Abstract
|
Since energy crisis, heat integration has become one of the important issues in the process systems engineering. Due to the price of energy is constantly rising, how to increase the efficient use of energy in the process has also become of great importance in the field of process design.
Ethylene oxide and styrene are both derived from the most basic and important building block of petrochemicals, i.e., ethylene. Ethylene oxide is a chemical used to make ethylene glycol, which is the primary ingredient in antifreeze. It is also used in the manufacture of ethylene-oxide derivatives (EOD), including both of the low molecular and high molecular polymers for use in many applications such as detergent additives. Styrene is the monomer used to make polystyrene, which has a multitude of uses, and has been an important intermediate chemical in the plastics industries and rubber industries. In terms of inherent safe designs, since ethylene oxide has a very wide range of explosion limits-3-80%, we have to pay attention to the design of reactors. It is also worth mentioning that the styrene product can spontaneously polymerize at higher temperature, it is necessary to maintain the product temperature below 125℃.
In this thesis, we have carried out two case studies: one is “ethylene oxide process”, and the other is “styrene monomer process”. Ethylene-oxide process belongs to an important category as oxidation in the chemical industries. Like most ethyl benzene/styrene facilities, there is significant heat integration between the two plants. The ethyl benzene reaction is exothermic, so steam is produced, and the styrene reaction is endothermic, so energy is used in the form of steam. Both of the two cases were simulated first by using AspenPlus. Then, heat- exchanger network designs were synthesized and analyzed by using SuperTarget. Significant utility savings were achieved for both of the two case studies. The hot utility savings is 34% and cold utility savings is 25%, as compared with the base-case design, for the ethylene-oxide process with a minimum approach temperature of 10℃. While the hot utility savings is 70% and cold utility savings is 63%, as compared with the base-case design, for the alkylation reaction (exothermic) of the styrene process with a minimum approach temperature of 10℃, the hot utility savings is 30% and cold utility savings is 3%, as compared with the base-case design, for the dehydrogenation reaction (endothermic) of the styrene process with the same minimum approach temperature. Finally, if we take appropriate cold/hot streams for heat integration from the whole styrene process, we found the hot utility savings is 65% but no cold utility savings with a minimum approach temperature of 10℃.
|
Reference
|
-
Ahmad, S., B. Linnhoff and R. Smith, “Cost Optimum Heat Exchanger Networks: II. Targets and Design for Detailed Capital Cost Models,”Comp. and Chem. Engng., 14, 751 (1990).
連結:
-
Britton, L.G., Using Material Data in Static Hazard Assessment, Plant/Operations Progress, 11, 2, 56 (1992).
連結:
-
Douglas, J.M. ,Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes, p.518 (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988)
連結:
-
Floudas, C.A., A.R. Ciric and I.E. Grossmann, “Automatic Synthesis of Optimum Heat Exchanger Network Configurations,” AIChE J. 32, 276 (1986).
連結:
-
Gundersen, T. and I.E. Grossmann, “Improved Optimization Strategies for Automated Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis Through Physical Insights,”Comp. and Chem. Engng., 14, 925 (1990).
連結:
-
Linnhoff, B. and J.R. Flower, “Synthesis of Heat Exchanger Network: 1. Systematic Generation of Energy Optimal Network,” AIChE J. 24, 633 (1978).
連結:
-
Mashuga, C.V. and D.A. Crowl, Application of the Flammability Diagram for Evaluation of Fire and Explosion Hazards of Flammable Vapors, Process Safety Progress, 17, 3, 176 (1998).
連結:
-
Papoulias, S.A. and I.E. Grossmann, “A Structural Optimization Approach to Process Synthesis—II. Heat Recovery Networks,”Comp.and Chem. Engng., 7, 707 (1983).
連結:
-
Yee, T.F., I.E. Grossmann and Z. Kravanja, “Simultaneous
連結:
-
Optimization Models for Heat Integration—I. Area and Energy Trageting and Modeling of Multistream Exchangers,” Comp. and Chem. Engng., 14, 1151 (1990).
連結:
-
Yee, T.F. and I.E. Grossmann, “Simultaneous Optimization Models for Heat Integration—II. Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis,” Comp. and Chem. Engng., 14, 1165 (1990).
連結:
-
吳承鴻,製程整合與能源節約技術在低溫程序上之應用,碩士論文,淡江大學 (2005)。
連結:
-
張國基、陳俊瑜,以本質較安全設計探討火力發電廠汽力機組鍋爐設備操作之危害預防,化工技術,第14卷,第4期,第195-210頁 (2006)。
連結:
-
ASPEN PLUS User’s Guide: Version 11.0, Aspen Tech., Boston, MA, U.S.A. (2002).
-
Crowl, D.A. and J.F. Louvar; Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, 2ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, U.S.A. (2002).
-
Eichel, F.G., Electrostatics, Chem. Eng., Mar.13, p.153, (1967).
-
Hohmann, E.C., “Optimum Networks for Heat Exchange,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southern California, U.S.A. (1971).
-
Linnhoff, B., “Pinch Analysis – A State-of-the-Art Overview, ” Trans.IChemE., 71, Part A, 503 (1993).
-
SUPERTARGET. SUPERTARGET User’s Guide, Linnhoff March
-
Ltd.,Cheshire, U.K. (2003).
-
陳錫仁、宋振奇,儲槽之安全設計理念暨災害防治,工業安全科技,第34期,第7-11頁,經濟部工業局 (2000)。
-
鍾祥生,環氧乙烷槽車設計圖/環氧乙烷槽車灌裝標準作業程序,
-
中國人造纖維股份有限公司 (1999)。
-
段開紀,靜電與油料安全,工業污染防治,第4卷,第4期,第188-189頁 (1985)。
|