Title

組織人員創新潛力指標架構與測量的建立

Translated Titles

Constructing Employee Innovativeness Index: Framework and Measurment

DOI

10.6846/TKU.2015.00598

Authors

黃姵青

Key Words

創新潛力 ; 指標 ; 組織人員 ; Innovativeness ; Index ; Employee

PublicationName

淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2015年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

李仲彬

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

【研究背景與問題】 對於組織維持進步與保持其水準,「創新」或許是相當重要的趨勢與方向,大部分的文獻也已指出組織內部人員是相當重要的影響因素,然而,對於組織內部人員的創新,過去的文獻未曾有以個人為測量對象,大多是以組織作為測量單位,至此,為瞭解組織內部人員的創新潛力,本研究制定組織內部人員創新潛力指標與架構,並針對不同環境下的公務人員與企業人員進行施測,得出指標架構。 【研究發現】 本研究藉由Woodman(1990)的組織創造力產出架構中的四個影響個人因素,使用迴歸分析方法得出組織內部人員創新潛力指標架構中預測力與解釋力較高的指標,在公務人員的部分包括:外向性程度與自我犧牲程度,企業人員的部分則包括:工作投入程度、責任感程度和重視工作待遇程度。根據分析結果,不同環境下的公務人員與企業人員在創新潛力指標架構上確實呈現出不同的指標架構,但這部分同時也證實,不同環境下的組織內部人員其著重部分與處世認知也有所不同。

English Abstract

Abstract: "Innovation" has been viewed as a key method for responding to environmental changes and improving organizational performance. Almost all organizations are pursuing ways to improve their innovative capacity to have more business sustainability. According to the academic theories, the innovativeness of organization’s employees is one of important determining factors of the organization’s innovation. Unfortunately, only a few studies have focused on the ‘individual level” (meaning the employee level) of innovativeness. This research aims to construct a framework of employee’s potential innovativeness index and the measurements of the framework. Based on Woodman’s (1990) organization creativity model and literature review, this research has developed an eighteAbstract: "Innovation" has been viewed as a key method for responding to environmental changes and improving organizational performance. Almost all organizations are pursuing ways to improve their innovative capacity to have more business sustainability. According to the academic theories, the innovativeness of organization’s employees is one of important determining factors of the organization’s innovation. Unfortunately, only a few studies have focused on the ‘individual level” (meaning the employee level) of innovativeness. This research aims to construct a framework of employee’s potential innovativeness index and the measurements of the framework. Based on Woodman’s (1990) organization creativity model and literature review, this research has developed an eighteen-indicators, four-dimensions framework that can be used to measure the potential of organization’s employee to develop innovation for their organization. And, this research finds that there are several differences between the measurement for private sector employees and the measurement for public servants en-indicators, four-dimensions framework that can be used to measure the potential of organization’s employee to develop innovation for their organization. And, this research finds that there are several differences between the measurement for private sector employees and the measurement for public servants.

Topic Category 商管學院 > 公共行政學系公共政策碩士班
社會科學 > 政治學
Reference
  1. 余嬪、吳靜吉、陳以亨、區衿綾(2011)。不同年齡男女專業工作者之玩興與工作創新。教育心理學報,42(3)。
    連結:
  2. 吳文龍、黃萬居(2007)。自然科創意與批判思考教學對國小學生學習動機、批判思考及科學創造力之研究。科學教育月刊,304,頁12-28。
    連結:
  3. 吳宗憲(2012)。台南市政府文官公共服務動機與工作滿意、工作努力意願之實證研究-以個人/組織配適度作為調節變項。公共行政學報,(43),91-126。
    連結:
  4. 李仲彬(2013)。影響地方政府創新產出量的因素。東吳政治學報,31(1),頁105-160。
    連結:
  5. 邱皓政、陳燕禎、林碧芳(2009)。組織創新氣氛量表的發展與信效度衡鑑。測驗學刊,56(1),頁69-97。
    連結:
  6. 洪久賢、洪榮昭、林麗娟、蔡長艷(2007)。影響教師創意教學因素之研究─以綜合活動領域為例。師大學報:教育類,52(2),頁49-71。
    連結:
  7. 洪榮昭、康鳳梅、林展立(2003)。傑出科技創作學童創造特質分析-以機器人競賽為例。師大學報:科學教育類,48(2),頁239-253。
    連結:
  8. 胡夢蕾(2006)。我國創造力與人格特質研究之回顧與探析。教育學刊,(26),頁215-239。
    連結:
  9. 胡龍騰、張鐙文、楊仁鈐(2008)。你,願意分享嗎?公部門組織成員知識分享行為之底蘊。東吳政治學報,26(3),頁57-114。
    連結:
  10. 張文智、江潤華(2008)。提升設計組織創造力做法之研究。設計學報,13(1)。
    連結:
  11. 曹瓊文(2012)。行政機關員工公共服務動機與情緒勞務之研究:以新北市中和區公所為例(碩士論文)。淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班學位論文,臺北縣。
    連結:
  12. 葉玉珠(2000)。創造力發展的生態系統模式及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報,32(1),頁95-121。
    連結:
  13. 葉玉珠、吳靜吉、鄭英耀(2000)。影響科技與資訊產業人員創意發展的因素之量表編製。師大學報:科學教育類,45(2),頁39-63。
    連結:
  14. 蔡啟通(2008)。內在動機與員工創新行為之關係:Amabile三元交互效果及shin中介效果之驗證。管理學報,25(5),頁549-575。
    連結:
  15. 蔡啟通、高泉豐(2004)。動機取向、組織創新氣候與員工創新行為之關係:Amabile動機綜效模型之驗證。管理學報,21(5),頁571-592。
    連結:
  16. Abbey, A. & Dickson, J. W. (1983). R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 362-368.
    連結:
  17. Ahmed, P. K. (1998). Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 30-43.
    連結:
  18. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California management review, 40(1), 39-58.
    連結:
  19. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
    連結:
  20. Brewer, G. A. & Maranto, R. A. (2000). Comparing the roles of political appointees and career executives in the US federal executive branch. The American Review of Public Administration, 30(1), 69-86.
    連結:
  21. Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston:Little, Brown.
    連結:
  22. Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 5(1), 105-123.
    連結:
  23. Frese, M. & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in organizational behavior, 23, 133-187.
    連結:
  24. Jones,S.L. & Arnold,J.E.(1962). The Creative Individual in Industrial Research. ire transactions on engineering management, 9, 51-55.
    連結:
  25. Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1(2), 75-130.
    連結:
  26. Martins, E. C. & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European journal of innovation management, 6(1), 64-74.
    連結:
  27. McCrae, R. R. & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.
    連結:
  28. McLean, L. D. (2005). Organizational culture’s influence on creativity and innovation: A review of the literature and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 226-246.
    連結:
  29. Miron, E., Erez, M. & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 175-199.
    連結:
  30. Mohr, L. B. (1969). Determinants of innovation in organizations. The American Political Science Review, 111-126.
    連結:
  31. Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of public administration research and theory, 6(1), 5-22.
    連結:
  32. Rice, G. (2006). Individual values, organizational context, and self-perceptions of employee creativity: Evidence from egyptian organizations. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 233-241.
    連結:
  33. Riding, R. J. & Sadler‐Smith, E. (1997). Cognitive style and learning strategies: Some implications for training design. International Journal of Training and Development, 1(3), 199-208.
    連結:
  34. Saleh, S. D. & Wang, C. K. (1993). The management of innovation: Strategy, structure, and organizational climate. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 40(1), 14-21.
    連結:
  35. Sarros, J. C., Cooper, B. K. & Santora, J. C. (2008). Building a climate for innovation through transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 145-158.
    連結:
  36. Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
    連結:
  37. Siegel, S. M. & Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978). Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(5), 553.
    連結:
  38. Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1993). Investing in creativity. Psychological inquiry, 4(3), 229-232.
    連結:
  39. Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 143-145.
    連結:
  40. Tang, H. K. (1998). An inventory of organizational innovativeness. Technovation, 19(1), 41-51.
    連結:
  41. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E. & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
    連結:
  42. 吳明隆(2009)。SPSS操作與應用-問卷統計分析實務。台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
  43. 吳清山(2001)。知識管理與學校效能。知識管理與教育革新發展研討會論文集,國立中正大學,頁4-1。
  44. 李弘暉、湯雅云(2005)。轉換型領導、創造力技能與創造力關係之探討—以LMX為干擾變數。第三屆管理思維與實務學術研討會論文集,頁53-71。
  45. 李佩貞(2013)。工作熱情對創新行為影響之研究-以自我導向學習與職場友誼為中介變項。國立臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系人力資源碩士在職進修專班。臺北。
  46. 李耕輔、房美玉(2009)。人格特質與工作績效之關係探討-以某高科技產業公司研發關鍵人才為例。第十二屆企業人力資源管理實務專題研究成果發表會,國立中央大學。
  47. 李章順(2009)。策略導向績效管理-KPI體系建構與實施。臺北縣新店市:聯合發行。
  48. 林博文、吳宜靜、江成欣(2007)。創新模式的新典範-開放式創新。產業與管理論壇,9(3),頁6-23。
  49. 林碧芳、邱皓政(2008)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編製與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊,4(1),頁141-169。
  50. 邱皓政(2012)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例分析。台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
  51. 唐錦超譯,Rogers, E. M.原著(2006)。創新的擴散。台北:遠流。
  52. 徐聯恩、田文彬(2002)。認知風格與創新。研發論壇月刊,23,頁33-40。
  53. 張明輝(2006)。創新管理與學校經營。教育研究月刊,145,頁41-49。
  54. 張榮容(2012)。我國績優行政機關創新服務樣態之分析-以政府服務品質獎為例(未出版之碩士論文)。東海大學行政管理暨政策學系研究所,臺中。
  55. 莊文忠譯(2009)。SPSS在社會科學的應用。台北:五南出版社。
  56. 陳敦源、李仲彬(協同主持人)、張鎧如(2013)。考試院委託,「部門陞遷制度之實證研究:以正義觀點為核心的檢視」研究計畫。
  57. 曾冠球(2004)。基層官僚人員裁量行為之初探:以台北市區公所組織為例。行政暨政策學報,第三十八期,頁95-140。
  58. 黃榮護(1999)。公共管理。台北:商鼎文化。
  59. 賴麗珍譯(2009)。日常創造力與人類特質新論。台北:五南出版社。
  60. Halvorsen, T., Hauknes, J., Miles, I. & R?ste, R. (2005). On the differences between public and private sector innovation. Publin Report D, 9.
  61. Sheth, J. N. (1981). Psychology of innovation resistance: the less developed concept. Research in Marketing, 4(3), 273-283.