Title

歐盟與印尼的夥伴合作協定(PCA)-歐盟強化其與印尼雙邊關係的政策工具

Translated Titles

"Partnership Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the European Union (EU) and the Republic of Indonesia: An EU Instrument to Intensify its Bilateral Engagement with Indonesia"

DOI

10.6846/TKU.2014.00833

Authors

美妲

Key Words

合作夥伴協定( PCA ) ; 歐盟-東協關係 ; 反恐議題 ; 印尼毀林 ; 自願夥伴協議( VPA ) ; Partnership Cooperation Agreement (PCA) ; EU – ASEAN relations ; Counter-terrorism issue ; Indonesia’s deforestation issue ; Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA)

PublicationName

淡江大學歐洲研究所博士班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2014年

Academic Degree Category

博士

Advisor

鄒忠科

Content Language

英文

Chinese Abstract

歐盟和印尼在2009年11月簽署「夥伴合作協定」( PCA )。該一協議強化歐盟和印尼自1980年「歐盟- 東協夥伴關係協定」( EAPA )以來,超過三十年的雙邊關係。此外,歐盟-印尼PCA的目標是成為雙方擴大合作的法律框架和指導方針。經濟利益則為歐盟-東協建立區域間合作關係的主要力量。然而,歐盟的外交政策和其在亞洲的區域內發展趨勢,也成為歐盟與東南亞積極發展合作關係的另一主要原因。1980年歐盟與東協正式簽署的合作協議,涵蓋貿易、經濟和發展等政策。然而,有鑒於歐盟和東協之間不同的發展層次和政治原則,維持區域間的關係有一定困難。歐盟還認為強化與東協的個別國家,包括印尼,特別是雙邊合作夥伴關係,以保持歐盟的經濟和政治利益,以及處理全球和區域性問題。 在東南亞國家中,印尼是第一個與歐盟簽署PCA的國家。儘管印尼在20世紀90年代末,從威權政體過渡到民主國家,印尼仍面臨著一些內部的挑戰。同時,印尼的穩定是確保歐盟在印尼以及東南亞區域的經濟和政治利益的必要條件。 總結來說,PCA使歐盟與印尼雙方更容易建立彼此關係。歐盟需要PCA展現促進印尼發展的能力,也可以協助歐盟在印尼推展公眾外交。對印尼而言,透過PCA與歐盟的直接互動,能夠獲得歐盟的更多支持,以鞏固其目前的國內成就,及提高國際地位的努力。 其次,PCA使歐盟能尋求戰略合作夥伴,以支持區域間的關係。歐盟透過PCA的機會,強化與印尼在非經濟議題上的合作關係。此外,此一合作關係將協助歐盟介入東南亞事務,以及強化區域間的關係 第三,PCA能提高印尼作為區域和全球行動者的內部能力。因此,對印尼而言,國家和非國家行為者之間的良好協調、承諾和能力,得以確保順利推動PCA的各個項目。 第四,PCA下的合作夥伴關係強化印尼在東南亞的角色,印尼並且成為歐盟在東南亞的重要夥伴。這種夥伴關係意味,印尼在此一區域的成就,已經受到歐盟的肯定。印尼與歐盟的雙邊關係將促進印尼在東南亞地區的領導地位。

English Abstract

In November 2009, the European Union (EU) and Indonesia signed a Partnership Cooperation Agreement (PCA). This agreement strengthened the bilateral relations between the EU and Indonesia that has been existed for more than thirty years, under the 1980 EC – ASEAN Partnership Agreement (EAPA). In addition to that, the PCA aims to be a legal framework and guideline for expanding cooperation between the two parties. Economic interests were the primary force behind the establishment of EC- ASEAN interregional relations. However, the development of the EC’s foreign policy profile and its intraregional tendencies in Asia became the other main reason for the EC’s engagement with Southeast Asia. This aspiration is formalised by the signature of the 1980 EC - ASEAN Cooperation Agreement, which encompasses aspects of trade, economic and development policy. However, the different level of development and political principles between the EU and ASEAN made this interregional relation have some difficulties. The EU further considers to strengthening bilateral partnership with the individual ASEAN countries, including Indonesia, which is significant particularly, in order to maintain EU economic and political interests, and to manage global and regional issues. Among Southeast Asian countries, Indonesia is the first country to sign a PCA with the EU. In spite of its remarkable transition from an authoritarian to a democratic country at the end of the 1990s, Indonesia is still facing substantial internal challenges. Meanwhile, the stability of Indonesia is a necessary condition to secure EU economic and political interests in this country and in the region. In conclusion, the PCA allows both sides to build connections easily. The EU needs the PCA in order to show its capacity in the development of Indonesia. It can facilitate the public diplomacy of EU in Indonesia. For Indonesia, the direct interaction through PCA provides an opportunity to gain a bigger support from the EU, which is significant to back up the current achievement of Indonesia and the effort to raise its international posture. Secondly, the PCA enables the EU to look for its strategic partner to support interregional relations. The PCA gives an opportunity for the EU to strengthen its partnership with Indonesia on non-economic issues. Additionally, the partnership will support EU involvement in Southeast Asia and will back up its interregional relations. Thirdly, the PCA can contribute to the improvement of Indonesia’s internal capacity as a regional and global actor. Therefore, the commitment, capabilities and good coordination between state and non-state actors from Indonesian side, are significant in ensuring all programmes under PCA work well. Fourthly, the partnership under PCA gives an opportunity to strengthen Indonesia’s position to be considered as one of the EU’s significant partners in Southeast Asia. This partnership means that Indonesia is significantly recognised in the region for its dynamic achievements. Bilateral relations with the EU will boost the position of Indonesia as a leader in Southeast Asia.

Topic Category 人文學 > 人類學及族群研究
國際事務學院 > 歐洲研究所博士班
Reference
  1. Antonenko, Oksana, and Kathryn Pinnick (2005). Russia and the European Union: Prospects for a new Partnership.London: Routledge.
    連結:
  2. Balme Richard, and Brian Bridges (2008). Europe – Asia Relations: Building Multilateralism, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan
    連結:
  3. Bindi, Frederiga (2010). The Foreign Policy of the European Union: Assessing Europe’s Role in the World. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
    連結:
  4. Bretherton, Charlotte and John Vogler (2006). The European Union as a Global Actor, 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
    連結:
  5. Cameron, Fraser (2007). An Introduction to European Foreign Policy. London: Routledge.
    連結:
  6. Chaban, Natalia, Martin Holland, and Peter Ryan (eds.) (2009). The EU through the Eyes of Asia: New Cases, New Findings. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
    連結:
  7. Dent, Christopher (1999). The European Union and East Asia: an economic relationship. London: Routledge.
    連結:
  8. Hanggi, H., R.Roloff and J. Ruland (eds.) (2006). Interregionalism and International Relations. London: Routledge
    連結:
  9. Hill, Christopher and Michael Smith (2005). International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    連結:
  10. Keohane, Robert (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    連結:
  11. Kumar, Ramakrishna and See Seng Tan (eds.) (2003). After Bali: Threat of Terrorism in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies
    連結:
  12. Leifer, Michael (1983). Indonesia’s Foreign Policy. London: George Allen & Unwin
    連結:
  13. Murray, Phillomena (eds.) (2008), Europe and Asia: Regions in Flux, Hampshire -Palgrave-Mac-millan
    連結:
  14. Nye, Joseph, and Robert Keohane (2000). Power and Interdependence, 3rd Edition. Massachusetts: Longman
    連結:
  15. Smith, Karen (2009), European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World. London: Polity.
    連結:
  16. Stokholf, Wim, Paul van der Velde and Yeo Lay Hwe (eds.) (2004). The Eurasian Space: Far More Than Two Continents .Singapore: ISEAS.
    連結:
  17. Aspinall, Edward & Mark T. Berger (2001). The break-up of Indonesia after decolonisation and the limits of the nation-state in post-cold war Southeast Asia,” Third World Quarterly, 22, 6: 1003-1024
    連結:
  18. Bobrow, Davis B (1999). The US and ASEM: Why the hegemon didn’t bark, The Pacific Review. 12, 1 (1999): 103-128.
    連結:
  19. Borocz, Jozsef and Mahua Sarkar (2005). What is the EU?. International Sociology, 20: 153-173
    連結:
  20. Camroux, David (2007). Interregionalism or Merely a Fourth-Level Game? An Examination of the EU – ASEAN Relationship. East Asia, 27: 57-77
    連結:
  21. De Gucht, Karel (2006). Shifting EU Foreign Policy into Higher Gear. EU Diplomacy Papers, 1: 1-12
    連結:
  22. Egreteau, Renaud (2010). Intra-European Bargaining and the ‘Tower of Babel’ EU Approach to Burmese Conundrum, East Asia (an International Quarterly), 27,1: 15-33.
    連結:
  23. Forster, Anthony (1999). The European Union in South-East Asia: continuity and change in turbulent times. International Affairs, 75, 4: 743-758
    連結:
  24. Forster, Anthony (2000). Evaluating the EU-ASEM relationship: a negotiated order approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 7, 5: 787-805
    連結:
  25. Gilson, Julie (2005). New Interregionalism? The EU and East Asia, European Integration, 27, 3: 307-326
    連結:
  26. Gunaryadi (2005). European Union Visibility in Indonesia, Asia Europe Journal, 3: 49-62
    連結:
  27. Haacke, Jurgen (2006). Myanmar’s foreign policy: Domestic Influence and International implications, Adelphi Papers, 381, London: Routledge
    連結:
  28. Hardcare, Alan and Michael Smith (2009). The EU and the Diplomacy of Complex
    連結:
  29. Interregionalism, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 4:167-188
    連結:
  30. He, Kai. (2008), Indonesia's foreign policy after Soeharto: international pressure, democratization, and policy change, International Relations of Asia Pacific, 8, 1: 47-72
    連結:
  31. Hettne, Bjorn and Fredrik Soderbaum (2005). Civilian Power or Soft Imperialism? The EU as a Global Actor and the Role of Interregionalism, European Foreign Affairs Review, 10:535-552.
    連結:
  32. Hull, Robert (1984). European community-ASEAN relations: A model for international partnership? Asian Affairs, 15, 1: 15-26
    連結:
  33. Islam, Shada (2011). Indonesia’s rise: implication for Asia and Europe. European View, 10: 165-171
    連結:
  34. Jones, David Martin (2008). Security and democracy: the ASEAN charter and the dilemmas of regionalism in South-East Asia. International Affairs, 84:4
    連結:
  35. Keohane, Daniel (2008). EU Foreign Policy and Counter-terrorism, Journal of Common Market Studies, 46, 1:125-146.
    連結:
  36. Kivimaki, Timo (2007). Can development and democratization address the root causes of terrorism in Southeast Asia, Pacific Review, 20, 1: 49-73
    連結:
  37. Koopman, Georg and Marco Wilhelm (2010). EU Trade Policy in the Age of Bilateralism, Intereconomics, 5: 305-312
    連結:
  38. Konstadakopulous, Dimitrious (2009). Cooling the earth? The changing priorities of EU-Asia technology cooperation, Asia Europe Journal, 7: 345-366
    連結:
  39. Latipulhayat, Atip, and Agil Ariananto (2012), Legality of the European Union flight ban towards Indonesian Airlines, International Journal of Public Law and Policy, 2,2: 149-161
    連結:
  40. Mc Carthy, Stephen, and Luca Taconi (2011). The Political Economy of tropical deforestation: assessing models and motives, Environmental Politics, 20, 1: 115-132
    連結:
  41. Meunier, Sophie and Kalypso Nicolaidis (2006). The European Union as a conflicted trade power, Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 6: 906-925
    連結:
  42. Moeller, Joergen O (2007). ASEAN’s Relations with the European Union: Obstacles and Opportunities, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29, 2: 465-482
    連結:
  43. Murphy, Ann Marie (2009). Indonesia Returns to the International Stage: Good News for the United States, Orbis Winter: 65-79
    連結:
  44. Mujani, Saiful and William R. Liddle (2009). Muslim Indonesia‘s Secular Democracy, Asian Survey, 49, 4: 575-590.
    連結:
  45. Palmujoki, Eero (1997). EU – ASEAN Relations: Reconciling Two Different Agendas. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 19, 3: 269-285
    連結:
  46. Park, Sung Hoon (2004), “ASEM and the future of Asia-Europe Relations: Background, characteristics and challenges,” Asia Europe Journal, 2: 341-354
    連結:
  47. Reiterer, Michael (2009). Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM): fostering a multi-polar world order through inter-regional cooperation, Asia Europe Journal, 7,1: 179-196
    連結:
  48. Ruland, Jurgen (2010). Balancers,Multilateral Utilities or Regional Identity Builders? International Relations and the Study of Interregionalism, Journal of European Public Policy, 17, 8:1271-1283.
    連結:
  49. Severino, Rodolfo, C (2007). ASEAN Beyond Forty: Towards Political and Economic Integration, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29, 3: 406-423
    連結:
  50. Silvestri, Sara (2009). Islam and Religion in the EU Political System, West European Politics, 32, 6: 1216
    連結:
  51. Smith, Michael (1994). The European Union: foreign economic policy and the changing world arena. Journal of European Public Policy, 1, 2: 283-302
    連結:
  52. Soderbaum, Fredrik, Patrik Stalgren and Luk Van Langenhove (2005). The EU as a Global Actor and the Dynamics of Interregionalism: a Comparative Analysis. European Integration, 27, 5: 365-380
    連結:
  53. Smith, Anthony (1999). Indonesia’s Role in ASEAN: The End of Leadership?, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 21, 2: 238-260
    連結:
  54. Steinberg. David. I. (2007). The United States and Its Allies: The Problem of Burma/Myanmar Policy. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29, 2: 219-237
    連結:
  55. Storey, Ian. J.(2000). Indonesia’s China Policy in the New Order and Beyond: Problems and Prospects. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 22: 1
    連結:
  56. Storey, Ian. J. (2008). Securing Southeast Asia’s Lanes: A Work in Progress. Asia Policy, 6: 107-108, being accessed in http://asiapolicy.nbr.org
    連結:
  57. Sukma, Rizal (1995). The Evolution of Indonesia’s Foreign Policy: An Indonesian View, Asian Survey, 35, 3: 304-315
    連結:
  58. Sukma, Rizal (2009), Indonesia – China Relations: The Politics of Re-engagement, Asian Survey, 49, 4: 591-608
    連結:
  59. Suryadinata, Leo (1995). Islam and Suharto’s Foreign Policy: Indonesia, the Middle East and Bosnia, Asian Survey, 35, 3: 291-303
    連結:
  60. Ward, Ellis, and Peter Carey (2001). The East Timor in the context of EU-Indonesia Relations, 1975-1999, Indonesia and Malay World, 29, 83: 51-74
    連結:
  61. Weatherbee, Donald, E. (2005). Indonesian Foreign Policy: A Wounded Phoenix, Southeast Asian Affairs, (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies): 158
    連結:
  62. Widodo, Tri (2007). European Presence in Indonesia, Asia Europe Journal, 5
    連結:
  63. Zhou, Adrian, and Elspeth Thomson (2009), The Development of biofuels in Asia, Applied Energy 86: 511-520
    連結:
  64. Zielonka, Jan (2008), Europe as a global actor: empire by example, International Affairs, 84, 3
    連結:
  65. Sukma, Rizal (2008), “Indonesia’s Foreign Policy Since Reformasi: Change and Continuity,” Southeast Asia Bulletin, Center For Strategic and International Studies
    連結:
  66. “Plassnik: Indonesia is a valued and influential power partner of the EU in Asia,” Press Release, 27.03.2006, accessed at http://www.uealc.at/en/News/Press_Release/March/2703plassnik1.html
    連結:
  67. Foreign Policy Conference London School of Economics & King’s College
    連結:
  68. London, 30 June 2006. Available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/
    連結:
  69. “FTA talks with Singapore scheduled for March”, Europolitics, 14 January 2010, at http://www.europolitics.info/fta-talks-with-singapore-scheduled-for-march-art259984-40.html
    連結:
  70. “Indonesia, EU sign partnership agreement,” The Jakarta Post, November 11, 2009
    連結:
  71. Brussels Declaration on More Effective Global Economic Governance: Towards More Effective Global Economic Governance’, 5 October 2010, at
    連結:
  72. Solana, Javier (2003), “Europe Security Strategies: A Secure Europe in a Better World,” accessed at http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf
    連結:
  73. EU-ASEAN Joint Declaration
    連結:
  74. EU-ASEAN Joint Declaration on Cooperation to Combat Terrorism (2003) at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/74271.pdf
    連結:
  75. Newspapers
    連結:
  76. Interview with Ms. Dewi M. Kusumastuti, Director, Directorate of Interregional Cooperation Europe and America, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia
    連結:
  77. Bibliography
  78. Books:
  79. Baylis John and Steve Smith (2005). The Globalization of World Politics: an Introduction to International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  80. Conboy, Ken (2008), Elite: The Special Forces of Indonesia, 1950-2008. Jakarta: Equinox
  81. Edwards, Geoffrey and Elfriede Regelsberger (1990). Europe’s Global Links. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  82. Hardcare, Alan (2009). The Rise and Fall of Interregionalism in EU External Relations Dordrecht: Republic of Letters.
  83. Maull, Hans, Gerald Segal and Jusuf Wanandi (1998). Europe and The Asia Pacific. London: Routledge.
  84. Kingsburry, Damien (2005). The Politics of Indonesia, 3rd Edition Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  85. Lowry, Robert (1996). The Armed Forces of Indonesia. St. Leonard, Australia: Alien & Unwin)
  86. Melissen, Jan, and Sook Jong Lee (eds) (2011). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in East Asia. New York - Palgrave-Macmillan
  87. Nugent, Neil (2006). The Government and Politics of the European Union, 6th Edition. Hampshire: Palgrave-Macmillan.
  88. Peters, Guy B (1999). International Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism. London: Pinter
  89. Ricklefs, M.C. (1993). A History of Modern Indonesia, 2nd Edition. Stanford: University Press
  90. Rosamund, Ben (2001). Theories of European Integration. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  91. Soderbaum, Fedrik and Stalgren (2010). The European Union and the Global South. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  92. Journals:
  93. Brown, Jessica. (2011). Jakarta’s Juggling Act: Balancing China and America in the Asia-Pacific. Foreign Policy Analysis, 5: 1-15, accessed at http://www.cis.org.au
  94. Cremona, Marise (2004). The Union as a Global Actor: Roles, Models and Identity. Common Market Law Review, 41: 553-573
  95. Feith, Peter (2006). Aceh Monitoring Mission (AMM): A Future Model for EU Crisis Management? Jurnal Kajian Wilayah Eropa, 2. 1: 5-15
  96. Kaplan, Robert (2009). Center for the Twenty-first Century. Foreign Affairs, 88, 2 : 16-29
  97. Pichler, M (2010). Agrofuels in Indonesia: Structures, Conflicts, Consequences, and the Role of the EU. ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 3, 2: 175-193
  98. Robbles, Alfredo C. Jr (2008). An EU - ASEAN FTA: The EU Failures as an International Actor, European Affairs Foreign Review, 13: 522-555.
  99. Schmitz, Manuel (2012). The European Union and Indonesia: Problems and Prospects for a Global Partnership, accessed at http://www.eias.org/documents/EIAS_Briefing_Paper_April_2012_Manuel_Schmitz.pdf, p.5
  100. Soedijarto (2009). Some Notes on the Ideals and Goals of Indonesia’s National Education System and the Inconsistency of its Implementation: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 2: 1-11
  101. Papers/Reports:
  102. Camroux, David (2006), The Rise and decline of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM): Asymmetric bilateralism and the limitation of interregionalism, Centre D’etudes Europeennes, cahiers Europeens, no. 03/2006.http://www.portedeurope.org/IMG/pdf/Cahiers_europeen_CAMROUX-2.pdf
  103. Chandra, Alexander C., Anna Alfaro Manurung, Daniel Pambudi, and Beginda Pakpahan (2009), Hopes and Fears: Indonesia’s prospects in an ASEAN-EU Free Trade Agreement, International Institute of Sustainable Development (2009), accessed at http://www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?pno=1272
  104. Garcia, Jose Minambres “Foreign Direct Investment in Southeast Asia: International Flows and The European Union Case,” a paper presented for the 2011 Annual Conference on Southeast Asian Studies in Taiwan (ACSEAST 2011), April 29-30, 2011, Tamkang University, Taiwan
  105. Ruland, Jurgen (2001), ASEAN and the European Union: A Bumpy Interregional Relationship, ZEI Discussion Paper: 2001
  106. Ruland, Jurgen (2002) “The European Union as an inter- and transregional actor: lessons for global governance from Europe's relations with Asia”, National Europe Center, Paper No. 13, Paper presented to Conference on The European Union in International Affairs, National Europe Centre, Australian National University, 3-4 Juy 2002, accessed at https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/41658/3/ruland.pdf
  107. Research shows big potential gains from new FTAs. Memo* - Brussels, 23 April 2007, at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2007/april/tradoc_134543.pdf
  108. Mukhim, Megha, ”ASEAN Foreign Direct Investment Trends: Implications for EU – ASEAN Relations,” EPC Issue Paper, 31, No.4 (2005), European Policy Centre, accessed at http://www.epc.be
  109. Murray, Philomena (2010), The European Union as an Integration Entrepreneur in East Asia – Yardstick or Cautionary Tale? Paper to the Australian Political Studies Association Conference, The University of Melbourne, 27-29 September 2010, accessed at http: www.apsa2010.com.au/full-papers.php
  110. Sukma, Rizal (2009) ‘Indonesia’s Response to the rise of China: Growing Comfort Amid Uncertainties.’ In the Rise of China: Responses from Southeast Asia and Japan, NDIS Joint Research Series No.4. Tokyo: National Institute for Defence Studies
  111. Articles from online newspapers/magazines/others
  112. Business Area (2011), “The European Union plans to increase investment in Indonesia,” March 31, at http://businessarea.org/the-european-union-plans-to-increase-investment-in-indonesia-271348.html.
  113. De Vries, G. (2006) “The Fight Against Terrorism: Five Years After 9/11”. Presentation by Gijs de Vries, EU Counter-Terrorism Co-ordinator, Annual European
  114. CmsUpload/060630 LondonSchoolEconomics.pdf.
  115. “A divided agenda,” Southeast Asia Globe, 03 May 2010, at
  116. http://bx.businessweek.com/european-union/a-divided-agenda/3935493979075422916-54777f621c70efdddd63f0290cffb772/
  117. “RP, EU conclude PCA after 2 years,” Business Mirror, 07 June 2010 at http://www.bilaterals.org › Negotiations › EU-ASEAN
  118. “Trade talks between Singapore and EU well on track”, Deutsche Presse Agentur, 06 July 2010, at http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article17694
  119. “EU-Thai ties back on track, say diplomats”, Bangkok Post, 28 September 2010, at
  120. http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/198494/eu-thai-ties-back-on-track-say-diplomats
  121. “EU-ASEAN Minus FTA expected in three years’ time”, accessed at http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=12879 (accessed 18 December 2010)
  122. “EU and Singapore agree free trade deal,” 16 December 2012, accessed at www.reuters.com/.../us-eu-singapore-trade-idUSBRE8BF0762.
  123. Michael Matthiessen, EU – Singapore FTA shows free trade is the way to go, The Business Times, 2 January 2013, accessed at: http://www.eucentre.sg/articles/422/downloads/020113%20BT%20EU-S'pore%20FTA%20shows%20free%20trade%20is%20the%20way%20to%20go.pdf
  124. Andrew Higgins, ‘Some in Indonesia praise, seek to replicate China’s fight against United States’, The Washington Post (29 March 2010)
  125. Thomsen, Stephen, “EU – ASEAN: The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship? “ Briefing paper, International Economics Programme, October 2007, accessed at: http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/publicationspapers/view/-/id/545/,April 2011.
  126. Wihardja, Maria Monica, “The EU’s conservative and cautious approach,” The Jakarta Post, 16 March 2011, accessed at http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/03/16/the-eu%E2%80%99s-conservative-and-cautious-approach.html
  127. Official Documents:
  128. EC Main Trade Partner, at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/September/tradoc_113471.pdf, has been updated in 12 March 2012
  129. Global Europe: Competing in the World – A Contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy 2006, at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/october/tradoc_130370.pdf
  130. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/er/116888.pdf
  131. Braude, Pierre-Antoine and Giovanni Grevi, “The EU Mission in Aceh: implementing peace.” Occasional Paper no.61, (2005), EU Institute for Security Studies, accessed at http://www.iss.europa.eu/nc/actualites/analysisbooks/select_category/17/article/the-eu-mission-in-aceh-implementing-peace
  132. “Common Policy and Foreign Policy of Indonesia – European Union (EU)”, accessed at http://www.deplu.go.id
  133. Commission of the European Communities, Towards a New Asia Strategy, COM (94) 314 final, Brussels 13.07.1994.
  134. Commission of the European Communities, Creating a New Dynamic in ASEAN – EU relations, COM (96) 314, Brussels, 3.07.1996
  135. Country Environmental Profile of Indonesia 2005, Final Report, accessed at http://www.delidn.ec.europa.eu/
  136. “Developing Closer Relations between Indonesia and the European Union (2000),” accessed at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52000DC0050:EN:NOT
  137. European Commission, ‘Creating A New Dynamic in EU – ASEAN Relations, Annex 7 – Breakdown of EC financial assistance in ASEAN 1976-1995, COM (96) 314, Brussels 1996
  138. The EC Communication, “A New Partnership with Southeast Asia (2003)”, accessed at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=en&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2003&nu_doc=399
  139. EU Council Conclusion on Indonesia, 11 October 2004 accessed at http://www.delidn.ec.ec.europa.eu/en/references/pdfs/references_2_4_councilconclusions041011.pdf.
  140. EU – China: Closer Partners: Growing Responsibilities (2006), accessed at http://www.delchn.ec.europa.eu/download/communication-paper-ENG_070622.pdf
  141. Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and cooperation between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Indonesia, of the other part, 9 November 2009, accessed at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/policies/agreements/search-the-agreements-database?command=details&lang=en&aid=2009048&doclang=en
  142. Indonesia- Council Conclusion, a press release of 2249th, General Affairs Council Meeting, Brussels 20 March 2000, accessed at http//www.consilium.europa.eu.ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/gena/ACFCt93.htm
  143. Indonesia-European Community Strategy Paper 2002-2006, accessed at http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/indonesia/csp/02_06_en.pdf
  144. Indonesia-European Community Strategy Paper 2007-2013, accessed at http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/indonesia/csp/07_13_en.pdf
  145. Invigorating the Indonesia – EU Partnership: Towards a Comprehensive Economic Partnership http://www.eibd-conference.com/assets/files/1-26.pdf
  146. “The Archipelago economy: Unleashing Indonesia’s potential,” September 2012, being accessed at :http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/asia-pacific/the_archipelago_economy
  147. EU – Indonesia Development Cooperation 2010: The European Union and Indonesia A Partnership for Change, accessed at http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/indonesia/documents/eu_indonesia/blue_book/bb2010_intro_en.pdf
  148. Meijer, Roel (eds.), Counter-Terrorism Strategies in Indonesia, Algeria, and Saudi Arabia, Netherland Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, at www.nctv.nl/.../wodc-report-counter-terrorism-strategies-in-indonesia-algeria-and-saudi arabia...
  149. Thomsen, Stephen, “EU-ASEAN: The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship?” Briefing paper, International Economics Programme, October 2007, accessed at: http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/publications/papers/view/-id/545/,April 2011
  150. Landingin, Rolf, EU-ASEAN trade pact stalls over inclusion of Burma,’ Financial Times, August 7, 2007, accessed at http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/6a463794-415a-11dc-8f37 0000779fd2ac.html#axzz1Mb47QHVg
  151. Wihardja, Maria Monica, “The EU’s conservative and cautious approach, The Jakarta Post, 16 March 2011, accessed at http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/03/16/the-eu%E2%80%99s-conservative-and-cautious-approach.html
  152. Speeches/Interview
  153. Peter Mandelson (2009), “Tilting the global balance: Asia’s new trade growth”, Keynote Address, WEF Asia Forum, Singapore, 29 April,
  154. http://www.europaworld.org/week222/mandelsonspeech6505.htm,
  155. Interview with Mr. Ngurah Swajaya, Ambassador/Permanent Representative of the Republic of Indonesia to ASEAN, Indonesia
  156. Interview with Mr. Charles Whiteley, First Secretary, Head of Political, Press and Information Section, Delegation of the European Union to Indonesia and Brunei Darusalam, Jakarta, Indonesia
  157. Interview with Ms. Julia Nolan, Political Consellor, British Embassy Jakarta, Indonesia, 25 July 2012
  158. Interview with Mr. Onno Koopman, Deputy Head Political Affairs, Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Jakarta, Indonesia, 26 July 2012
  159. Interview with Mr. Thibaut Portevin, Programme Manager (Environment – Natural Resources) Development Cooperation Section, Delegation of the European Union to Indonesia, Brunei Darusalam and ASEAN, Jakarta
  160. Interview with Prof Dr. Djisman S. Simanjuntak, Co-Chairs of the Vision Group, Executive Director of Prasetya Mulya Business School
  161. Interview with Mr. Zul Azmi, Deputy Country Director Deustche Gesselschaft fur Internationale Zussammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Indonesia and Timor Leste
  162. Websites:
  163. http://www.asef.org.
  164. http://www.asienhaus.de/public/archiv/brdasia.htm
  165. http://www.embassyofindonesia.eu/ambassador/?q=content/international-conference-interfaith-dialogues
  166. http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/indonesia/press_corner/all_news/news/2011/20111024_02_en.htm
  167. http://www.eurunion.org/partner/agenda.htm
  168. http://www.mfp.or.id/eng/?page_id=762
  169. http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/