Title

領導型態、團隊文化及團隊凝聚力對團隊績效之影響-以金融機構為例

Translated Titles

The Impact of Leadership Style, Team Culture & Team Cohesion on Team Performance - A Case Study of Financial Institutions

DOI

10.6846/TKU.2014.00875

Authors

謝志成

Key Words

金融機構、領導型態 ; 團隊文化 ; 團隊凝聚力 ; 團隊績效 ; financial institutions ; leadership style ; team culture ; team cohesion ; team performance

PublicationName

淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2014年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

洪英正

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

在進入二十一世紀時,金融機構的競爭優勢及績效在於無形資產-人力資源素質的好壞,現在的銀行組織已從層級式調整為功能式團隊。企業大量地運用「團隊」工作型態,緣於團隊能夠加強解決問題能力、提高生產力與工作效率、有效地運用資源與降低成本,因此能以較少人力達到較高的績效。 然而領導者的不同領導型態決定了團隊的績效好壞。組織運用團隊合作方式,整合異質成員的能力與優勢,能夠有效察覺環境變動與顧客需求,可見團隊文化是影響績效的重要因素。團隊中所形成的凝聚力,能夠提升員工對組織的忠誠度,減少離職情形的發生,進而避免組織人力資本的流失。所以團隊之間成員之互動及溝通程度,對團隊亦會造成影響,團隊凝聚力對團隊績效具影響力。 本研究問卷以電子問卷方式對大台北地區金融機構員工為主,採便利抽樣,回收279份問卷,回收率為93%,藉由描述性統計、信度分析、因素分析、t檢定、變異數分析及層級迴歸分析等方法進行資料分析。 研究結果顯示,一、領導型態對團隊文化有顯著正向影響。二、團隊文化對團隊績效有顯著正向影響。三、團隊文化在領導型態對團隊績效影響上具部分中介效果。四、團隊凝聚力在團隊文化對團隊績效之影響上部分具有顯著調節作用。五、不同受試者主管性別在團隊凝聚力具顯著性差異。因此建議一、平衡領導型態可培養好的團隊文化。二、培養好的團隊文化,有助於團隊績效的提升。三、強化團隊凝聚力可以在團隊文化對團隊績效之影響力中提升團隊任務績效。

English Abstract

In the twenty-first century, the performance and competitive advantage of financial institutions lie on intangible assets - human resources quality is good or bad. Now the bank transforms from the hierarchical organization to functional type team. Large number of enterprises use "team" work patterns, due to the team to strengthen problem-solving skills, improve productivity and efficiency, efficient use of resources and reduce costs, and therefore less human cost but be able to achieve high performance. However, the leader with different leadership style determines the team's performance. Organizations use teamwork approach, integration capabilities and advantages of heterogeneous members can effectively detect environmental changes and customer needs, and so the team culture is an important factor affecting performance. Forming a cohesive team can enhance employee loyalty to the organization, reduce the incidence of employment situations, thereby be avoiding the loss of human capital in the organization. Therefore, the degree of interaction and communication among the members of the team will affect the performance. The team cohesion also influences the team performance. In this study the electronic questionnaires for financial institutions employees who work in Taipei area are used by convenience sampling. There are 279 questionnaires were recovered, the recovery rate was 93%. Then the data are analyzed with descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, factor analysis, t-test way ANOVA and hierarchical regression analysis. The results showed that the leadership style has a significant positive impact on the team culture. Second, the team culture has a significant positive impact on team performance. Third, the team culture has a partial mediating effect on the impact from leadership style to team performance. Fourth, team cohesion has a significant moderating effect on the impact from the team culture to team performance. Fifth, there is a significant difference on team cohesion by different gender of respondents’ managers. By these finding, we suggest that a balanced leadership style fosters good team culture. Second, cultivating a good team culture helps to improve team performance. Third, strengthen team cohesion can improve the influence from the team culture to team's task performance.

Topic Category 商管學院 > 企業管理學系碩士在職專班
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 王奕偉(2008)。以計劃行為理論探討大型會計師事務所審計人員之知識分享行為-團隊氣候及領導風格為外生變數。淡江大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文,新北市。
    連結:
  2. 周吟香(2009)。領導風格與組織文化對組織效能之影響-以中小型會計師事務所為例。淡江大學全球華商經營管理數位學習碩士在職專班碩士論文,新北市。
    連結:
  3. 胡夢蕾(2007)。國際觀光旅館員工的知識分享意願與服務創新表現知覺間關係之研究-以團隊文化為調節變項。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系餐旅管理與教育組碩士論文,台北市。
    連結:
  4. 陳瑾瑜(2009)。組織文化、領導行為及信任關係對溝通效能與工作士氣響之研究-以某電機公司為例。淡江大學企業管理系碩士在職專班碩士論文,新北市。
    連結:
  5. 黃村煜(2010)。魅力型領導、團隊運作與團隊績效關係之研究:以台灣傳銷業為例。朝陽科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文,台中市。
    連結:
  6. 劉民翎(2010)。領導與團隊文化對團隊績效之影響:以競合與團隊授權為中介機制。國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,新竹市。
    連結:
  7. Abdullah Al-Beraidi, Tudor Rickards (2003).Creative team climate in an international accounting office: an exploratory study in Saudi Arabia, Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(1), pp.7 - 18
    連結:
  8. Amy, E. (1999). Psychological safety and leaning behavior in work team. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383
    連結:
  9. Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1996). The Team Climate Inventory: Development of the TCI and its Application in Teambuilding for Innovativeness. European Journal of Word & Organizational Psychology, 5(1),53-66
    連結:
  10. Artemis & Prashant (2001). A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance Relationship
    連結:
  11. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., and Mount, M. K (1998). Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-team Processes and Team Effectiveness, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391
    連結:
  12. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations, New York: Free Press.
    連結:
  13. Bettinger, C. (1989). Use Corporate Culture to Trigger High Performance, Journal of Business Strategy, 10(2), 38-42
    連結:
  14. Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport group: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4,123-138
    連結:
  15. Carron & Shanghi (1987). Team cohesion and team success in sport.
    連結:
  16. Chow, C. W., Haddad, K. M. and Wu, A. (2003). Corporate Culture and Its Relation to Performance: A Comparative Study of Taiwance and U. S. Manufacturing Firms, Managerial Finance, 29 (12), 65-76
    連結:
  17. Conger,J. A. & R. N. Kanungo (1988). Toward A Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational Settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, 637-647
    連結:
  18. Cuieford (1965). A Study of the Relationship between Organizational Culture and Organizational Effectiveness of the Electronic Industries in Taiwan
    連結:
  19. Deal, T. E. & A. A. Kennedy (1982). Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Reading, MA: Addision-Welsey.
    連結:
  20. Denison, B.G., (1984). Bring Corporate Culture to the Bottom Line, Organizational Dynamics, Auturmn, 13(2), 4-23
    連結:
  21. Dessler, G. (1976). Organization and management: a contingency approach, Enlewood Geiffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
    連結:
  22. Early, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 26-49
    連結:
  23. Elenkov, D. S. (2002). Effects of leadership on organizational performance in Russian companies, Journal of Business Research, 55(6), 467-480
    連結:
  24. Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L.(1991). Group cohesion and performance: ameta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22(2):175-186
    連結:
  25. Haiman, J. L & Scott William G. (1974). Management in the Modern Organization, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    連結:
  26. House, R. J., (1995). Theory of Charismatic Leadership, in J. G. Hunt and L. L. Larson(Eds.). Leadership: The Cutting Edge.
    連結:
  27. Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli(1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and Consequences, Journal of Marketing, 57(July), 53-70
    連結:
  28. Johnson J. R. (2002). Leading the Learning Organization: Portrait of Four Leaders. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 23, 241-249
    連結:
  29. Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organization(2nd ed). New York:John Wiley.
    連結:
  30. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1997). A model of work team empowerment. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development, 10. Greenwich, connecticut: JAI Press, 131-167
    連結:
  31. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents & consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journa, 42(1), 113-119
    連結:
  32. Lawler, E. E., III, Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E., Jr. (1995). Creating high performance organizations: Practices and results of employee involvement and total quality management in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    連結:
  33. Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness and interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variable. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259-302
    連結:
  34. Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M. & Rich, G. A. (2001). Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Salesperson Performance, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 115-134
    連結:
  35. Motowidlo, S. J. & Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence That Task Performance Should be Distinguished From Contextual Permance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-480
    連結:
  36. Mullen & Copper(1994). The Relation Between Group Cohesiveness and Performance:An Integration
    連結:
  37. Parker, G. M. (1990). Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
    連結:
  38. Peters, T.j., and R. H. Waterman (1982). Insearch of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-run Companies. New York: Hawper and Row.
    連結:
  39. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Mooran, R. H., Podsakoff, Mackenzie, Moorman, R. H. & Fetter, R. (1991). Transformational Leader Behaviors, and Their Effects on Follower's Trust in Leader, Satisfactional, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142
    連結:
  40. Schein, E. H., (1992), Organizational Culture and Leadership. 2nd ed., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    連結:
  41. Shaw, J. B., & Power, B. E. (1998). the effect of diversity on small work group processes and performance. Human Relations. 51(10), 1307-1325
    連結:
  42. Stogdill, R. M.(1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 26-43
    連結:
  43. Tannenbaum, R. (1966). The concept of organizational climate, Personnel Psychology, 27, pp.465-467
    連結:
  44. Tjosvold, D. (1988a). Cooperative and competitive dynamics within and between organizational units. Human Relations, 41(6), 425-436
    連結:
  45. Tjosvold, D. (1988b). Cooperative and competitive interdependence: Collaboration between departments to service customers. Group and Organization Studies, 13(3), 274-289
    連結:
  46. Wellins, R. S., Byham, W. C., & Dixon, G. R. (1994). Inside teams: How 20 world-classs organizational are winning through teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
    連結:
  47. Wright, T. L., & Duncan, D. (1986). Attraction to group, group cohesiveness & individual outcome. Small Group Behavior, 17(4), 487-492
    連結:
  48. Yukl, G. A. (2001). Leadership in Organizations. (5th ed.) New Jersey
    連結:
  49. 李吉立(2009)。組織氣候、獎勵制度、領導型態與工作績效之關係-以海運承攬運送業為例。國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士學位論文,基隆市。
  50. 李東玟(2010)。執行長特質與團隊凝聚力對於接班與組織績效關係之調節效果-以NBA球隊為例。國立東華大學國際企業學系碩士班碩士論文,花蓮縣。
  51. 李達樺(2007)。團隊領導、團隊行為整合與團隊績效之關聯性探討:以金融單位為例。樹德科技大學金融與風險管理所碩士論文,高雄市。
  52. 宋信良(2007)。團隊氣候、人力資源管理及知識分享行為對團隊學習之影響-以機械產業為例。東海大學企業管理研究所碩士班碩士論文,台中市。
  53. 林怡華(2008)。團隊職能、集體效能、團隊凝聚力與團隊績效之關係探討以百貨公司樓面管理人員為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文,高雄市。
  54. 林幼麗(2008)。領導型態、團隊氣候對護理團隊績效之影響。長庚大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文,桃園縣。
  55. 林莉馥(2011)。不同型態的人力資源理實務對團隊工作績效的影響-以團隊氣候為中介變項。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,台北市。
  56. 邱淑妙(2006)。團隊人格特質、轉換型領導與團隊效能之關係探討-團隊凝聚力之中介角色。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文,高雄市。
  57. 洪大川(2012)。領導型態、內部行銷、組織承諾與工作績效關係之研究:以大陸某台商公司為例。南華大學企業管理系管理科學碩士論文,嘉義縣。
  58. 高有怡(2008)。護理督導領導風格與團隊氣候對領導效能之影響。長庚大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文,桃園縣。
  59. 莊文賢(2007)。領導型態、團隊凝聚力、集體效能、組織公正與智慧資本關係之研究-以台灣國際造船公司為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文,高雄市。
  60. 黃清長(2011)。透過合作與自我效能來探索團隊氣候與團隊績效之關係。萬能科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,桃園縣。
  61. 黃珠金(2012)。領導型態、激勵制度、工作滿意度及工作績效之關係-以空軍某基地後勤人員為例。南華大學企業管理系管理科學碩士論文,嘉義縣。
  62. 黃嬿蓉(2011)。護理團隊創新效能與轉換型領導風格和團隊氣候關係之探討。長庚大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文,桃園縣。
  63. 黃志強(2009)。組織文化與主管領導風格對工作績效關係之研究-以高雄市職業學校單位主管為例。國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
  64. 曾冠萍(2012)。樂樂棒球選手知覺教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力與成績表現之研究。國立臺南大學體育科教學碩士班碩士論文,台南市。
  65. 張祐瑄(2008)。授權賦能領導與團隊績效-知識分享與團隊凝聚力之中介效果。大葉大學人力資源暨公共關係學系碩士班碩士論文,彰化縣。
  66. 湯仁棟(2009)。證券營業員人格特質、主管領導型態對工作績效之影響:以某證券公司為例。世新大學管理學院財務金融學系碩士學位論文,台北市。
  67. 劉彥麟(2010)。領導型態、員工特徵及職能對工作績效之影響-以金融機構委外催收公司為例。世新大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文,台北市。
  68. 謝應妝(2009)。校長轉型領導與團隊文化、團隊學習效果之相關效果。國立中正大學教育學院教學專業發展數位學習碩士在職專班碩士論文,嘉義縣。
  69. 鄭國良(2011)。領導型態、組織文化、員工效能與領導效能模型發展之研究。龍華科技大學商學與管理研究所碩士學位論文,桃園縣。
  70. 鄭秀雯(2013)。公司主管領導風格、組織文化、工作滿意與員工離職傾向之研究-以南部某家科技公司為例。南華大學企業管理系管理科學碩士論文,嘉義縣。
  71. 盧麗如(2007)。組織文化、主管領導風格、員工工作滿意度與組織績效之研究。國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。
  72. 楊惠晶(2007)。護理長領導型態與護理工作團隊氣候對護理研發績效之影響。長庚大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文,桃園縣。
  73. Borman, W. C. and Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
  74. Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The Competence Manager: A Model for Effective Performance, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  75. Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
  76. Campbell, J. P. (1977). On the natural of organizational effectiveness, In Goodman, P. S. and Pennings, J. M. (Eds.), New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness, 13-55, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
  77. Catwrihg, D. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander(Eds.), Group dynamics:Research and theory(3rd ed.). London: Tavistock.
  78. Cruz, E. S. (2006). Framework, Business World, 1
  79. Draft R. L. (2001). Organization Theory and Design, DPS Associates, Inc. 304, 315, 507.
  80. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizationl behavior. Englewook Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 315-342
  81. Hollander, E. P. (1978). Leadership dynamics: a parctical guide to effective relationships, NY:Free Press.
  82. House. R. & Shamir. B. (1993). “Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic, and visionary theories”In M. Chemmers & R.Ayman (eds.) . Leadership theory and research perspectives and directions, 577-594
  83. House, R. J., J. Woycke and E. M. Fodor(1994). Charismatic and Non-charismatic Leaders: Differences in Behavior and Effectiveness. In J. A. conger and R. N. Kanungo (eds.), Charismatic Leadership, Sari Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 103-04.
  84. Litwin, G., & Stringer, R. (1968). Motivational and Organizational Climate. Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press
  85. Martens, R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1978). When cohesion predicts perfogmance outcome in sport. Research Quarter, 49,372-380
  86. Rauch, C. F. & Behling, O. (1984). Functionalism: Basis for an Alternate Approach to The Study of Leadership, In Leaders and Managers: International Perspectives on Managerial Behavior and Leadership, Edited J. G. Hunt et al, New York: Elmsford.
  87. Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
  88. Stogdill, R. M., & A. E. Coons (1957). Leader Behavior: It's Description and Measurement.Ohio: Bureau of Business Research The Ohio State University, 88, 1-27
  89. Wright, N., & Drewery, G. (2002). Cohesion among culturally heterogeneous group. Journal of American Academy of Business, 9,112-124