Translated Titles

A path analysis for influence of condominiums area mixture on property management



Key Words

線性結構方程式 ; 住宅混合 ; 社會混合 ; 管理維護 ; Linear Structural Modeling ; housing mix ; social mix ; Property Management



Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication


Academic Degree Category




Content Language


Chinese Abstract

我國集合住宅市場常見一個案有數種面積產品混合之現象,在過去研究指出不同面積之產品進行投資組合已成為建商降低風險與穩定報酬的手段,僅在供給面被討論,卻忽略了住宅市場應以『使用』為目的,換言之,產品面積混合(Housing mix)隱含購屋者其生活水平及背景之異質性(Social mix),將可能造成社區管理維護上之不易,本文試圖延伸過去此現象在需求面及管理維護上探討的不足。在實證方面,採問卷調查台北市建管處公寓大廈管理科所提供之已報備成立管理組織的主任委員2,877份,回收率為11.30%,剔除沒有舉辦活動之社區並符合設定樣本大小與母體可容忍誤差α=10%之要求下,共307筆有效問卷。輔以公寓大廈科報備資料掌握至所有面積及其對應之戶數,建立『面積混合度』之衡量,結合當前國內外住宅混合與住宅隔離議題,透過路徑分析方式衡量面積混合對社區管理維護績效之影響為直接影響或間接影響?釐清混合對管理維護影響過程之因果關係。 研究結果顯示,建商供給者之面積混合策略對於住戶需求者之管理維護績效將是間接負面影響而非傳統迴歸所觀察得到的直接影響,驗證了國外負面外溢效果在國內亦是如此。而主要影響路徑為面積混合愈高則提高了社區衝突,進而對管理維護產生負面影響。其次,過去認為除面積混合之外,新舊社區與大小規模亦會影響管理維護,故進行兩群分析究竟何者影響管理維護較大?實證發現混合社區在經過搬遷磨合期將減緩混合因異質性所造成的不和睦,但混合之負面影響仍大於新舊社區之影響。

English Abstract

The phenomenon of one construction case with housing mix usually appears in the condominium market. Some studies indicated that the portfolio of housing mix has become a means of reducing risk and having a stable reward for construction companies. However, the discussion was only on supply, and ignored that “use” should be the main purpose in the condominium market. In other words, housing mix implied the social mix of homebuyers’ living standard and background, and it might make the community management and maintenance not easy. The study tries to extend the deficiency in the treatment of the phenomenon on supply or on community management and maintenance. In proof, a questionnaire survey was adopted in the study. There were 2877 pieces of questionnaires released to the chairmen of registered management organizations according to the data from the Apartment and Building Management Division in the Building Administration Office of Taipei City Government. The recovery rate was 11.3%. The communities without holding activities were culled out, and in order to satisfy the requirement of the set sample dimension and the error tolerance of matrix belowα=10%, total valid questionnaires were 307 pieces. The measurement of “housing mix” can be built up by the supplementary information from the Apartment and Building Management Division, which includes all square measure and corresponding houses. Combing the subjects of residential mix and residential separation at home and abroad, housing mix could be measured by path analysis to see whether it has a direct or indirect affect on community management and maintenance to further figure out the casual relationship during the affection process of the housing mix and the community management and maintenance. The study results show that the policy of housing mix from the suppliers, construction companies, has an indirect negative affection on the performance of community management and maintenance for residents, the demanders, instead of having a direct affection observed by traditional regression analysis. The result proves the negative spillover effect no matter at home or abroad. The path of impact is that the higher the housing mix is, the higher the community conflict will be, and the situation will generate negative affection on community management and maintenance. Furthermore, except the housing mix, new and old communities or the sizes of communities were thought to affect community management and operation, and they were usually divided into two groups to analyze which one has greater affection on management and maintenance ? It is found by evidences that the communities with housing mix show less disharmony caused by social mix after the run-in period of movement. However, the negative affection of housing mix is still higher than the one of new and old communities.

Topic Category 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
社會科學學院 > 地政研究所
  1. 1. 李春長,2008,「資訊揭漏、信任、搜尋成本對委託房屋仲介業售屋意願之實證研究」,『住宅學報』,17(1):71-104
  2. 4. 林欣柔、彭建文、曾明遜,2004,「起造人於公寓大廈管理維護作用之探討」,『台灣土地研究』,7(2):4
  3. 5. 洪幸妙、張金鶚,1993,「住宅管理維護對住宅品質之影響研究」,『都市與計畫』,20(1):1-22
  4. 6. 洪子茵、張金鶚,1993,「台北市集合住宅管理維護模式之研究」,『都市與計劃』,29(3):421-444
  5. 8. 張維升、張金鶚,2008,「夢醒時分─購屋理想與現實之差距」,『住宅學會第十七屆學術研討會論文集』,上冊:252
  6. 10. 陳建良、林祖嘉,1998,「財富效果、所得效果、與住宅需求」,『住宅學報』,7:83-100
  7. 11. 陳香妃、張金鶚、葉毅明,2007,「從集體行動看社區意識與管理制度對公寓大廈管理維護之影響-管理維護客觀績效與社區主委主觀滿意度分析」,『都市與計畫』,34(2):139-163
  8. 14. 楊宗憲,2003,「住宅市場之產品定位分析—建商推案行為之研究」,『住宅學報』,12(2):123-139
  9. 1. Adepoju, G.. O., 1974, “Evaluating consumers' satisfaction with housing: An Application of a Systems Approach” ,American Institute of Physics,40:189-200
  10. 2. Andersson, R., Musterd, S. G., Galster, G. & Kauppinen, T. M. , 2007 ,“What Mix Matters? Exploring the Relationships between Individuals’Incomes and Different Measures of their Neighbourhood Context”,Housing Studies, 22(5):637–660
  11. 4. Blau, G. J. & Boal, K. B., 1987,“Conceptualizing How Job Involvement and Organization Commitment Affect Turnover and Absenteeism”, Academy of Management Review, 12(2):288-300
  12. 5. Blokland, T., 2003,“Social Relationships in an Inner City Neighbourhood”, Urban Bonds,Polity Press, Cambridge
  13. 6. Chattopadhyay, R.R., 1998,“ Possible Mechanism of Antihyperglycemic Effect of Gymnema sylvestre Leaf Extract, Part I”, Elsevier Science,31(3): 495–496
  14. 7. Chou, S. C., Boldy, D.P. & Andy, L.H. , 2003,“Factors Infouencing Risidents’ Satisfaction in Residential Aged Care”, The Gerontologist, 43(4):459-472
  15. 8. Downs, A., 1999,“Some Realities about Sprawl and Urban Decline”, Housing Policy Debate,10(4):955-974
  16. 9. Galster, G. C., 2002,“An economic efficiency analysis of deconcentrating poverty populations”, Journal of Housing Economics, 11: 303-329
  17. 10. Galster G, C., 2005,“Consequences From the Redistribution of Urban Poverty During the 1990s: A Cautionary Tale”, Economic Development Quarterly ,” 19: 119-125
  18. 11. Gurran, N. and Milligan, V. and Baker, D. C. and Bugg, L. B. and Christensen, S. A., 2008,“New directions in planning for affordable housing: Australian and international evidence and implications”, Research and Policy Bulletin, 105(120):1-143.
  19. 13. Lu, M., 1999,“Determinants of residential satisfaction:ordered logit vs. regression model”,Growth and Change, 30:264-287
  20. 14. Maruyama, G. M., 1997,“Basics Of Structural Equation Modeling”, SAGE Pablictions Ltd., pp.25
  21. 15. Mikyoung, H., 1989,“The determinant of residential environmental quality and satifaction: Toward Developing Residential quality Indices”, Oklahoma State University PHD.
  22. 16. Jacobs, J. M., 1993,“The City Unbound: Qualitative Approaches to the City”,Urban Studies ,30(4-5):827-48
  23. 18. Kearns, A, and Mason, P., 2007,“Mixed Tenure Communities and Neighbourhood Quality”, Housing Studies, September 22 (5): 661–691
  24. 19. Kearns, A. and Parkes, A., 2003,“Living In and Leaving Poor Neighbourhood Conditions in England”,Housing Studies , 18(6):827-851
  25. 22. Madanipour A, G Cars, et al., 1998, “Social Exclusion in EuropeanCities: Processes, Experiences and Responses”, London, Routledge
  26. 23. Murie, AS.& Musterd, S., 2004,“Social Exclusion and Opportunity Structures in European. Cities and Neighbourhoods”, Urban Studies, 41(8):1441-1459.
  27. 24. Musterd S, Andersson R., 2005,“Housing mix, social mix and social opportunities”,Urban Affairs Review, 40:761-790
  28. 26. Portes A, M Zhou, 1996,“Self-employment and earnings of immigrants”, American Sociological Review, 61(2):219-230
  29. 27. Savasdisara, T., 1988,“Residents’ satisfaction and neighbourhood characteristics in Japanese urban communities”,Landscape and Urban Planning, 15:201-210
  30. 29. Susan S. Fainstein, 2005,“ Cities and Diversity,” Urban Affairs Review”, 41:3-19
  31. 31. Vesselinov, E., Cazessus, M,. Falk, W., 2007,“Gated communities and spatial inequality”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(2)
  32. 32. Wilson, W. J., 1987,“The declining significance of race: The truly disadvantaged—the inner city, the underclass, and public policy”, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp254.
  33. 33. Ostendorf, W., Musterd, S. & Sjoerd, D. V., 2001,“Social Mix and the Neighbourhood Effect. Policy Ambitions and Empirical Evidence”,Housing Studies, 16(3): 371–380
  34. 一、中文參考文獻
  35. 2. 朱芳妮,2008,「集合住宅混合使用對管理維護績效之影響」,『住宅學會第十七屆學術研討會論文集』,上冊:87
  36. 3. 林瑞穗、林萬億,1996,「社區發展與村里組織功能問題之探討」,『行政院研究發展考核委員會報告書』,頁3
  37. 7. 侯錦雄、宋念謙,1998,「住台中市黎明住宅社區居民社區意識之研究」,『建築學報』,24: 51-65
  38. 9. 張玉貞、張宗銘、樓翠針、黃銘顯(1993),『產品定位實務』,基泰顧問。
  39. 12. 溫豐文,1997,『公寓大廈管理問題之研究』,行政院研考會委託。
  40. 13. 郭益銘、張金鶚,2008,「住宅個案產品類型混合度之研究─以台北都會區為例」,『住宅學會第十七屆學術研討會論文集』,下冊:742
  41. 二、外文參考文獻
  42. 3. Beckhoven van Ellen, Musterd S., Ostendorf W., Sankey Siân, 2004,“Physical policies for social problems”, Social Housing, UNECE Symposium, November:28-30
  43. 12. Leishman, C.,2001 ,“ House building and product differentiation: An hedonic price approach”, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16(2):131-152
  44. 17. Grant J., Greene, K. D.,Maxwell, K., 2004,“The planning and policy implications of gated communities. Canadian Journal of Urban Research”, Supplement: Canadian Planning and Policy, 13(1): 70-88
  45. 20. Kemp,.P.A., 1995,“Researching Housing management Performance”,Housing Studies , 32(4-5):779-790
  46. 21. Li, Z. G., Xue, D., Wei, L., 2007,“Housing Mix in European and American Cities: Theoriesa, Application and Implication”,City Planning Review, 2007(2): 38-44
  47. 25. Marcuse, P.and Kempen, van R., 2002,“Of States and Cities: The Partitioning of Urban Space”, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  48. 28. Sharp, M., 2004,“Supplementary Planning Guidance:Market Housing Mix”, Huntingdonshir District Council Press, pp.6-7
  49. 30. Tunstall, R. & Fenton, A., 2006,“In the Mix. A Review of Mixed Income, Mixed Tenure and Mixed Communities”, Joseph Rowntree Foundation and Housing Corporation, London:English Partnerships, pp.40
  50. 34. Xavier, M. J., 1999,“ Strategic marketing: a guide for developing sustainable competitive advantage”,New Delhi:Thousand Oaks
Times Cited
  1. 李建佑(2016)。居民參與都市更新意願之影響因素探討:理論與實證證據。臺灣大學土木工程學研究所學位論文。2016。1-68。