Title

專利為基礎之企業研發績效評估與改善分析模式

Translated Titles

A Patent-based Analysis Model for R&D Performance Evaluation and Improvement of Enterprises

Authors

陳昶宏

Key Words

資料包絡分析法 ; 研發績效 ; 專利 ; 差額變數分析 ; R&D performance ; Patent ; Data envelopment analysis ; Slack variable analysis

PublicationName

臺北科技大學工業工程與管理系碩士班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2014年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

車振華

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

近年來,各個產業市場競爭愈趨激烈,企業利用其研發成果獲得大量利潤。因此,若企業研發績效低落,將面臨利潤減少,甚至無法在競爭市場上立足的窘境。專利是企業用來展現與保護己身研發成果的主要工具,因此,本研究將發展專利為基礎之企業研發績效評估與改善分析模式。為正確評估企業研發績效,本研究首先建構專利為基礎之企業研發績效評估架構,從研發活躍程度與研發品質兩大構面著手,用以完整評估企業整體研發績效。再者,本研究運用資料包絡分析法 (Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA) 發展專利為基礎之企業績效評估模式,評估各個企業之相對研發績效值,以協助管理者取得在特定產業中企業研發績效之優勢排序。接著,本研究使用差額變數分析,提出企業研發績效改善分析模式。針對研發活躍程度與研發品質兩大構面,分別提供非標竿企業具體改善方向與建議。最後,本論文運用牙醫器材公司為案例進行驗證本方法論之可行性。

English Abstract

In recent years, enterprises use their R&D results to get profits and get a leading position in the competitive market. Therefore, if the R&D performance is low, the enterprises will face reduced profits, not even a foothold in the competitive market dilemma. Patents are used to show the enterprises’ R&D results and the main protection tools, therefore, this study will develop the R&D performance evaluation and improvement analysis mode. Patents as main tools to show the enterprises' R&D performance, therefore, this study develops R&D performance evaluation and improvement analysis model. To properly assess the enterprises R&D performance, the level of R&D activity and R&D quality are two facets to construct R&D performance assessment framework. In addition, this study uses data envelopment analysis to construct enterprise performance evaluation model and give managers the advantages of R&D performance of sorting. Then, in order to give suggestions to improve R&D performance, this study uses slack variable analysis to construct the R&D improvement model to given suggestions of the level of R&D activity and R&D quality. Finally, this paper uses dental equipment company as a case study to verify the feasibility of the methodology.

Topic Category 管理學院 > 工業工程與管理系碩士班
工程學 > 工程學總論
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 2. A. Gambardella, D. Harhoff, B. Verspagen “The value of European patents,” Europe Management Review, vol.5, no.2, 2008, pp.69-84.
    連結:
  2. 3. B. Fabry, H. Ernst, J. Langholz, M. Koster “Patent portfolio analysis as a useful tool for identifying R&D and business opportunities—an empirical application in the nutrition and health industry” World Patent Information, vol.45, no.5, 2006, pp.215–225.
    連結:
  3. 4. B. Van Pottelsberghe, N. Van Zeebroeck, “A brief history of space and time: the scope-year index as a patent value indicator based a families and renewals,” Scientometrics, vol.75, no.2, 2008, pp.319–338.
    連結:
  4. 5. C. Breyer, C. Birkner, J. Meiss, J.C. Goldschmidt, M. Riede, “A top-down analysis: Determining photovoltaic’s R&D investments from patent analysis and R&D headcount,” Energy Policy, vol.62, 2013, pp.1570-1580.
    連結:
  5. 6. C.H. Heieh, “Patent value assessment and commercialization strategy,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.80, no.2, 2013, pp.307-319.
    連結:
  6. 7. C.H. Jeong, K.S. Kim, “Creating patents on the new technology using analogy-based patent mining,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol.41, no.8, , 2014, pp.3605–3614.
    連結:
  7. 8. D. Harhoff, M. Reitzig, “Determinants of opposition against EPO patent grants—the case of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.22, no.4, 2004, pp.443-480.
    連結:
  8. 9. D. Hicks, T. Breizman, D. Olivastro, K. Hamilton, “The changing composition of innovative activity in the US a portrait based on patent analysis,” Research Policy , vol.30, no.4, 2001, pp.681-703.
    連結:
  9. 10. D. Popp, N. Santen, K. Fisher-Vanden, M. Webster, “Technology variation vs. R&D uncertainty: What matters most for energy patent success?,” Resource and Energy Economics, vol.35, no.4, 2014, pp.505-533.
    連結:
  10. 11. D. Somaya, “Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation,” Strategic Management Journal, vol.24, 2003, pp.17-38.
    連結:
  11. 12. D. Thorleuchter, D.V. Poel, A. Prinzie, “A compared R&D-based and patent-based cross impact analysis for identifying relationships between technologies,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.77, no.7, 2010, pp.1037-1050.
    連結:
  12. 13. F. Narin, “Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output,” Scientometrics, vol.34, no.3, 1995, pp.489-496.
    連結:
  13. 14. F.M. Tseng, C.H. Hsieh, Y.N. Peng, Y.W. Chu “Using patent data to analyze trends and the technological strategies of the amorphous silicon thin-film solar cell industry,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.78, 2011, pp.332-345.
    連結:
  14. 15. G. Littmann-Hilmer, M. Kuckartz, “SME tailor-designed patent portfolio analysis,” World Patent Information, vol.31, no.4, 2009, pp.273-277.
    連結:
  15. 16. G. Thoma, “Composite value index of patent indicators: Factor analysis combining bibliographic and survey datasets,” World Patent Information, 2014.
    連結:
  16. 17. H. Ernst, “Patent information for strategic technology management” World Patent Information, vol.25, 2003, pp.233–242.
    連結:
  17. 18. H. Ernst, N. Omland, “The Patent Asset Index – A new approach to benchmark patent portfolios,” World Patent Information, vol.33, 2011, pp.34-41.
    連結:
  18. 19. H.J. Dou, “Benchmarking R&D and companies through patent analysis using free databases and special software: a tool to improve innovative thinking,” World Patent Information, vol.26, no.4, 2004, pp.297–309.
    連結:
  19. 21. J.C. Trappey, C.V. Trappey, C.Y. Wu, C.W. Lin, “A patent quality analysis for innovative technology and product development,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol.26, no.1, 2012, pp.26-34.
    連結:
  20. 23. K. Blind, J. Edler, R. Frietsch, U. Schmoch, “Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany,” Research Policy, vol.35, no.5, 2006, pp.655-672.
    連結:
  21. 24. K. Blind, K. Cremers, E. Mueller, “The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios,” Research Policy, vol.38, no.2, 2009, pp.428-436.
    連結:
  22. 26. M. Collan, M. Fedrizzi, P. Luukka, “A multi-expert system for ranking patents: An approach based on fuzzy pay-off distributions and a TOPSIS–AHP,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol.40, no.12, 2013, pp.4749-4759.
    連結:
  23. 27. M. Hirschey, V.J. Richardson, “Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors?,” Journal of Empirical Finance, vol.11, no.1, 2004, pp.91-107.
    連結:
  24. 28. M. Reitzig, “Improving patent valuations for management purposes-validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales,” Research Policy, vol.33, 2004, pp.393-957.
    連結:
  25. 29. P. Beneito, “The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models Original Research Article,” Research Policy, vol.35, no.4, 2006, pp.502-517.
    連結:
  26. 30. P.M. Picard, B.P. Potterie, “Patent office governance and patent examination quality,” Journal of Public Economics, vol.104, 2013, pp.14-25.
    連結:
  27. 31. R. Frietsch, P. Neuhausler, T. Jung, B.V. Looy, “Patent indicators for macroeconomic growth—the value of patents estimated by export volume,” Technovation, 2014.
    連結:
  28. 32. R. Haupt, M. Kloyer, M. Lange, “Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development,” Research Policy, vol.36, no.3, 2007, pp.387-398.
    連結:
  29. 34. S. Brunger-Weilandt, D. Geib, G. Herlan, R. Stuike-Prill, “Quality – Key factor for high value in professional patent, technical and scientific information,” World Patent Information, vol.33, no.3, 2011, pp.230-234.
    連結:
  30. 35. S. Shane, “Technological opportunities and new firm creation,” Management Science, vol.47, 2001, pp.205-220.
    連結:
  31. 36. T. Fischer, J. Leidinger, “Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value-An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions,” Research Policy, vol.43, no.3, 2014, pp.519-529.
    連結:
  32. 37. Y.J. Chiu, Y.W. Chen, “Using AHP in patent valuation Original Research,” Mathematical and Computer Modeling, vol.46, no.7-8, 2007, pp.1054-1062.
    連結:
  33. 1. A. Arora, M. Ceccagnoli, W.M. Cohen, “R&D and the patent premium,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.26, no.5, 2008, pp.1153-1179.
  34. 20. J.A. Barney, “Comparative patent quality analysis,” NACV White Paper, 2001, pp.6-14.
  35. 22. J.R. Allison, M.A. Lemley, K.A. Moore and R.D. Trunkey, “Valuable Patents,” Research Paper, no.133, 2003, pp.193-208.
  36. 25. L. Hikkerova, N. Kammoun, J.S. Lantz, “Patent life cycle: New evidence,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013.
  37. 33. R. Mann, “A New Look at Patent Quality,” American Law & Economics, vol.111, 2008, pp.1-7.