Title

企業流程再造與專案制度之實務導入及關鍵成功因素分析

Translated Titles

Critical Success Factors of Analyzing Business Process Reengineering and Project Management Practice

Authors

王韻涵

Key Words

企業流程再造 ; 專案管理 ; 關鍵成功因素 ; 模糊層級分析法 ; business process reengineering ; project management ; critical success factors ; fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

PublicationName

臺北科技大學工業工程與管理系碩士班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2014年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

盧大平

Content Language

英文

Chinese Abstract

本研究結合企業流程再造與專案管理制度之實務導入案,該專案之執行對象為大陸消費性電子公司,執行時間為一零二年年初至一零三年年中,且至今已前往該公司之深圳廠區六次。該專案之執行主要分為三大項目,第一,結合企業流程再造與廣泛運用在台灣電子產業的C-system研發流程的概念,建立專屬於該公司之主要執行流程:C-flow,第二,建立專案管理制度以監督及跟進該公司之每一新產品依據主要流程執行,並確保該流程與公司內員工每日之工作內容相結合,最後,建立關鍵績效衡量指標以評估執行之成效。 在本研究中,詳盡的描述執行導入的結合工作流程的概念並且提升工作執行的完整性之實際情況。本研究希望萃取該專案執行的成功經驗,成為其他未來相關企業流程再造實務專案之參考。因此,本研究建立企業流程再造與專案管理實務導入之關鍵成功因素模型,使用模糊層級分析法分析每一因素之相對權重,並以實際執行之專案案例解釋其管理意涵,以提供管理者決策之參考,提高企業流程再造實務導入之成功機率。

English Abstract

This research is focus on a real practice of Business Process Reengineering (BPR) and Project Management (PM) system. The project was carried out in China, where we visited six times over the past one and half years to execute it. First, we build up the business critical process, within the concept of business process reengineering (BPR). Second, this critical business process was followed up by project management (PM) system. And then, the execution performance was assessed by key performance indicators. In the research, the execution of this implementation is described, to realize the concept of workflow and improve the work completeness. This study extracts the experience of this project, to apply to other executions of implementation projects and for future reference. This research constructs a critical success factors (CSFs) model of BPR and PM system practices, using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to analyze the weighting of each factor, and then explain the business meaning with this case study. The analyses include the results of BPR and PM system implementation practices, and the CSFs model of FAHP analysis result. Through the result of these analyses, it can improve the BPR implementation and new system import practices in future related cases. The FAHP analysis identified the top five CSFs: “Strong Leadership”, “Top Management Support”, “Communication”, “Capable Project Team”, and “Specialist Assistance” as the top five most important CSFs. These could support managers’ decision-making, and increase the success rate in BPR and PM system implementations.

Topic Category 管理學院 > 工業工程與管理系碩士班
工程學 > 工程學總論
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 3. A. Munns and B. F. Bjeirmi, "The role of project management in achieving project success," International journal of project management, vol. 14, 1996, pp. 81-87.
    連結:
  2. 4. M. Terziovski, et al., "Successful predictors of business process reengineering (BPR) in financial services," International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 84, 2003, pp. 35-50.
    連結:
  3. 5. A. Gunasekaran and B. Kobu, "Modelling and analysis of business process reengineering," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 40, 2002, pp. 2521-2546.
    連結:
  4. 6. H. R. Kerzner, Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
    連結:
  5. 12. S. K. Dubey and S. Bansal, "Critical Success Factors in Implementing BPR in a Government Manufacturing Unit–An Empirical Study," International Journal of Business and Management, vol. 8, 2012, p. p107.
    連結:
  6. 13. M. Sambasivan and N. Y. Fei, "Evaluation of critical success factors of implementation of ISO 14001 using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study from Malaysia," Journal of cleaner production, vol. 16, 2008, pp. 1424-1433.
    連結:
  7. 15. V. Y. Chen, et al., "Fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting the best environment-watershed plan," Applied Soft Computing, vol. 11, 2011, pp. 265-275.
    連結:
  8. 17. D. W. Stewart, et al., Focus groups: Theory and practice vol. 20: Sage, 2007.
    連結:
  9. 19. J. Kitzinger, "Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups," BMJ: British medical journal, vol. 311, 1995, p. 299.
    連結:
  10. 20. A. H. Lee, et al., "Analysis of priority mix planning for the fabrication of semiconductors under uncertainty," The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 28, 2006, pp. 351-361.
    連結:
  11. 21. F. Zahedi, "The analytic hierarchy process—a survey of the method and its applications," interfaces, vol. 16, 1986, pp. 96-108.
    連結:
  12. 22. L. A. Zadeh, "Fuzzy sets," Information and control, vol. 8, 1965, pp. 338-353.
    連結:
  13. 23. S.-H. Tsaur, et al., "The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM," Tourism management, vol. 23, 2002, pp. 107-115.
    連結:
  14. 24. A. H. Lee, et al., "A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 34, 2008, pp. 96-107.
    連結:
  15. 25. C.-F. Chen and C.-L. Lee, "Determining the attribute weights of professional conference organizer selection: an application of the fuzzy AHP approach," Tourism Economics, vol. 17, 2011, pp. 1129-1139.
    連結:
  16. 26. T. L. Saaty, "How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process," European journal of operational research, vol. 48, 1990, pp. 9-26.
    連結:
  17. 27. R. Csutora and J. J. Buckley, "Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method," Fuzzy sets and Systems, vol. 120, 2001, pp. 181-195.
    連結:
  18. 28. D. Grant, "A wider view of business process reengineering," Communications of the ACM, vol. 45, 2002, pp. 85-90.
    連結:
  19. 31. A. Smith, et al., "The CSFs, Quality Governance, BPR Performance and Gaining Competitive Advantage," International Journal of Business and Management, vol. 8, 2013, pp. 48.
    連結:
  20. 33. T. J. Crowe, et al., "Quantitative risk level estimation of business process reengineering efforts," Business Process Management Journal, vol. 8, 2002, pp. 490-511.
    連結:
  21. 34. A. R. Dennis, et al., "Breaking the rules: success and failure in groupware-supported business process reengineering," Decision Support Systems, vol. 36, 2003, pp. 31-47.
    連結:
  22. 36. S. L. Mansar and H. A. Reijers, "Best practices in business process redesign: validation of a redesign framework," Computers in Industry, vol. 56, 2005, pp. 457-471.
    連結:
  23. 37. M. Bertoni, et al., "PLM paradigm: How to lead BPR within the Product Development field," Computers in Industry, vol. 60, 2009, pp. 476-484.
    連結:
  24. 38. M. Al-Mashari, et al., "Business process reengineering: a survey of international experience," Business Process Management Journal, vol. 7, 2001, pp. 437-455.
    連結:
  25. 39. R. Silvestro and C. Westley, "Challenging the paradigm of the process enterprise: a case-study analysis of BPR implementation," Omega, vol. 30, 2002, pp. 215-225.
    連結:
  26. 40. H. L. BHASKAR, "BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING: A PROCESS-BASED MANAGEMENT TOOL.", Research Report, D.D.U. GORAKHPUP UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, INDIA, 2012.
    連結:
  27. 41. M. Attaran, "Exploring the relationship between information technology and business process reengineering," Information & Management, vol. 41, 2004, pp. 585-596.
    連結:
  28. 42. S. Limam Mansar, et al., "Development of a decision-making strategy to improve the efficiency of BPR," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, 2009, pp. 3248-3262.
    連結:
  29. 43. H. A. Reijers and S. Liman Mansar, "Best practices in business process redesign: an overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics," Omega, vol. 33, 2005, pp. 283-306.
    連結:
  30. 1. 黃淳毅,產業特性與新產品開發流程關係之研究,碩士論文,國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所,新竹,2003。
  31. 2. A. Chiarini, From Total Quality Control to Lean Six Sigma: Evolution of the Most Important Management Systems for the Excellence: Springer, 2012.
  32. 7. R. Burke, Project management: planning and control techniques, John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  33. 8. J. F. Rockart, "Chief executives define their own data needs," Harvard business review, vol. 57, 1979, p. 81.
  34. 9. A. C. Boynton and R. W. Zmud, "An assessment of critical success factors," Sloan Management Review, vol. 25, 1984, pp. 17-27.
  35. 10. R. A. Caralli, et al., "The critical success factor method: establishing a foundation for enterprise security management," Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute, DTIC Document2004.
  36. 11. L. Fan, et al., "Business Process Re-engineering in the SMEs: Critical Success Factors Perspective of an Emerging Economy," International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies, vol. 3, 2012, pp. 6-18.
  37. 14. M. N. HABIB, "Understanding Critical Success and Failure Factors of Business Process Reengineering.", International Review of Management and Business Research, vol.2, 2013, pp. 1-10.
  38. 16. M. Vahidnia, et al., "Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process in GIS application," The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 37, 2008, pp. 593-596.
  39. 18. R. A. Powell and H. M. Single, "Focus groups," International journal for quality in health care, vol. 8, 1996, pp. 499-504.
  40. 29. Meredith, Jack R., and Samuel J. Mantel Jr. Project management: a managerial approach. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
  41. 30. O. Otubanjo, "FACETS OF ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATION: AN UPDATE.", International Journal of Sales & Marketing Management Research and Development, vol. 2, 2012, pp.13-18
  42. 32. M. Rajeshwari, et al., "Business Process Reengineering and Customer Satisfaction in Indian Telecommunication sector.", Asia Pacific Journal of Research, vol. 3, 2013, p. 2320-5504.
  43. 35. M. Arif, "MANAGING THE ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE THROUGH BUSINESS PROCESS RE-ENGINEERING.", Global Journal of Business and Management, vol. 5, 2011, no. 1, pp. 50-57.
  44. 44. M. Alexandrova and L. Ivanova, "CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM PROJECTS SUPPORTED BY EU PROGRAMMES.", Proceeding of the 9th International ASCEU Conference on Systemic Economic Criese: Current Issues and Perspective, Macedonia, 2013.
Times Cited
  1. 甯政平(2015)。台灣傳統性產業的企業在大陸地區經營之變革與再造 —華澤公司之個案研究。臺灣大學臺大_復旦EMBA境外專班學位論文。2015。1-53。