Title

主管領導風格和員工人格特質與工作態度 之關聯性研究

Translated Titles

A Study on Correlation Between the Supervisor Leadership Styles and the Employee Personality Characteristics and Work Attitude

Authors

姜義訓

Key Words

領導風格 ; 人格特質 ; 工作態度 ; 內外控人格特質 ; 工作投入 ; 工作滿意 ; leadership style ; personality characteristics ; work attitude ; extraversion vs. introversion dimensions ; work engagemen ; work satisfaction

PublicationName

中原大學企業管理研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2016年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

陳瑾儀

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

人才對企業組織的競爭力影響甚鉅。因此,如何領導人才並使他們樂在工作一直是每個企業與主管都必須關心的課題。近年來各企業紛紛思考如何整合組織內部成員的力量,改採團隊工作的方式來促進組織內部人員彼此間的良好溝通與互動,以創造卓越的績效和貢獻。影響團隊中員工工作態度和績效表現的因素可以從領導者與員工二個不同層面進行探討。因此本研究以領導者之領導風格、員工人格特質及員工工作態度為變項,探討主管的領導風格型態與員工工作態度間的相關程度,主管的領導風格型態與員工人格特質之間的相關性及員工工作績效關聯性程度。本研究以問卷調查的方式以目前在職的上班族為樣本進行問卷填答與蒐集資料。 本研究結果顯示,組織中領導者的領導風格、員工工作態度兩者間的交互影響確實會影響員工的工作滿意度。研究發現,主管的體恤程度越高,對員工的工作滿意度及整體工作態度呈現正向且顯著的影響。主管的體制程度越高對員工工作績效的影響並不顯著;而不同的員工人格特質對於主管領導格風格與員工工作績效的交互作用中則只有外向性及內控人格特質的員工有顯著的正向影響。

English Abstract

The talents impact the competitive advantages of business organization immensely. Hence, how to lead the talents and make them enjoy their work have long been the primary concerns of every business and supervisor. In recent years, more and more corporations are contemplating on how to integrate the efforts of the members within the organization to enhance the better communication and interactions by introducing teamwork model to create outstanding performance and contributions. Factors influencing the work attitude and performance of the employee working on team can be best explored by dealing with two different dimensions – the leaders and the employees. Hence, this study applied the leadership style of the leaders, the personality characteristics and work attitude of the employees as research variables, tried to explore the correlation between the supervisor leadership styles and the employee work attitudes, and also the correlation between the supervisor leadership types and the employee personality characteristics. this study administered a questionnaire survey targeting to the currently active employees as sample for collecting data. The results demonstrated that the interactions between the leadership styles of the organization leaders and the employee work attitude substantially influence the employee work satisfaction. The study found that a higher consideration of the supervisor was reflected with positive and apparent influence in both the employee work satisfaction and the overall work attitude. In contrast a stronger focus on authority compliance by the supervisor was not the case in terms of influence to the employee work performance; further, in terms of the interactions between the employee personality characteristics and the supervisor leadership style as well as the employee work performance, the positive and apparent influence to the employees were reflected only in the employees with extraversion and introversion dimensions.

Topic Category 商學院 > 企業管理研究所
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 李 誠 (2006)。人力資源管理的12堂課,第3版,天下遠見。
    連結:
  2. 林佩珊 (2011)。員工績效評核、組織承諾與工作態度相關研究-以某商業銀行為例,
    連結:
  3. 周惠莉 (2003)。五大人格特質、性別角色與轉換型領導關聯性之研究,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  4. 許士軍 (1985)。管理學,東華書局。
    連結:
  5. 許士軍 (1994)。管理學,東華書局。
    連結:
  6. 曾燦燈 (1986)。國中校長領導型式與教師服務精神之關係,師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  7. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    連結:
  8. Armstrong, M. & Baron, A. (1998). Performance Management: The New Realities, London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
    連結:
  9. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, New York: The Free Press.
    連結:
  10. Brissett, M. & Nowicki, S. Jr. (1973). Internal Versus External of Reinforcement and Reaction to Frustration, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25(1), 35-39.
    連結:
  11. Byars, & Rue, L. W. (1994). Human resource management (4th ed.), Burr Ridge: IRWIN
    連結:
  12. Butterfield, E. C. (1964), Locus of Control, Test Anxiety, Reactions to Frustration, and Achievement Attitudes, Journal of Personality, 32(3), 355-370.
    連結:
  13. Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 637-647.
    連結:
  14. Day, David V. & Silverman, Stanley B. (1989). Personality and Job Performance: Evidence of Incremental Validity. Personnel Psychology, 42(1), 25-36.
    連結:
  15. Fiske, D.W. (1947). Consistency of the Factorial Structures of Personality Ratings from Different Source, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(3), 329-344.
    連結:
  16. Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative Description of Personality:The Big Five factor structure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229.
    連結:
  17. Joe, V. C. (1971). Review of the internal-external control construct as a personality variable.Psychological Reports, 28(2), 619-640.
    連結:
  18. John, P. Kotter. (1990). On What Leaders Really Do. President and Fellows of Harvard College.
    連結:
  19. Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizing. New York: Wiley.
    連結:
  20. Lussier, R. N. (1998). Human Relations in Organizations, Boston, MA: Irwin.
    連結:
  21. Mark J. Schmit, Jenifer A. Kihm, Chet Robie. (2000). Development of a global measure of personality. Personnel Psychology, 53(1), 153-193.
    連結:
  22. Masi, R. J. & Cooke, R. A. (2000). Effects of transformational leadership on subordinate motivation, empowering norms, and organizational productivity, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 8(1), 16-47.
    連結:
  23. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an Adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574-583.
    連結:
  24. Reitz, H. J. & Jewell, L. N. (1979). Sex, locus of control, and job involvement: A six-country investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 22(1), 72-80.
    連結:
  25. Robbins, S. P. (1992). Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies and Applications, (6th ed.), 599-631.
    連結:
  26. Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    連結:
  27. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1-28.
    連結:
  28. Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482–497.
    連結:
  29. Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personnel Factors Associated with Leadership, Journal Applied Psychology, 25(1), 35-71.
    連結:
  30. Stephen P. Robbins, (2002). Management: 2003 Update, (7th ed.) Prentice Hall.
    連結:
  31. Tannenbaum, R. I., R. Weschler & F.Massarick (1961). Leadership and Organization: A Behavioral Science Approach, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill.
    連結:
  32. 參考文獻
  33. 中文文獻
  34. 師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系碩士論文。
  35. 史懷哲 (1997)。績效獎金制度與醫院非醫師員工工作表現及滿意度關係之研究-以台北某教會醫院為例 以台北某教會醫院為例,國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究碩士論文。
  36. 吳秉恩 (1986)。組織行為學,華泰文化事業有限公司。
  37. 吳秉恩 (1992)。策略性人力資源管理:理念、運作與實務,中國經濟企業研究所。
  38. 吳靜吉 (1992)。內外控取向與工作滿足及績效之關係,國立政治大學學報,第41期,頁61-74。
  39. 楊國樞 (1989)。心理學,台灣商務印書館。
  40. 秦夢群 (1989)。教育行政理論與應用,五南書局。
  41. 蔡培村 (1980)。國中校長領導型式,教師人格特質與教師工作滿足之關係,國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
  42. 徐聯恩、劉彥伯 (1996)。專業組織激勵制度之研究,管理科學學報,第43卷第1期。
  43. 張潤書 (1985)。組織行為與管理,五南書局。
  44. 陳定國 (1981)。企業管理,三民書局。
  45. 謝文全 (1990)。教育行政-理論與實務,五南書局。
  46. 張春興 (1991)。現代心理學,東華圖書公司。
  47. 房冠寶 (2000)。人格特質與工作績效的關聯性研究-以證券業後勤行政人員為例,國立台灣科技大學管理研究所碩士論文。
  48. 曾憲章 (2000)。台灣產險公司薪資制度與業務人員激勵制度之探討,逢甲大學保險學系碩士論文。
  49. 詹益統 (1996)。個人屬性、人格特質與內滋激勵和外附激勵關聯性之研究-以交通部數據通訊所員工為例,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
  50. 薛婉婷 (1997)。人格特質與工作特性之契合對工作滿足與組織承諾之影響,中央大學人資所碩士論文。
  51. 鄭雅玟 (2006)。工作複雜度與主管領導風格對工作滿意度之影響研究-以台灣電子零件銷售業務人員為例,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
  52. 英文文獻
  53. Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman. & Associates , Personnel Selection in organizations, 71-98.
  54. Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1986). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  55. Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
  56. Dessler, G. (1994). Organization and Management:A Contingence Approach,2nd ed.,New York: Prentice -Hall Inc.
  57. Davis, K. (1977). Human Relation at Work: Organizational Behavior, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  58. Fiedler, F. E. (1974). A theory of leadership effectiveness, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company
  59. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. New York: Mcgraw Hill Hemphill, J.K., & Coons, A. E., Development of Leader Behavior DescriptionQuestionair, In R.M.
  60. Halpin, A. W. & B. J. Winer. (1957). A Factorial Stady of the Leader Behavior Descriptions, Paper Presented in the First International Conference on Bureau of Business Research, The Ohio State University, Ohio State.
  61. Hemphill, J. K. & Coons, A. E. (1957). Development of Leader Behavior Description Questionair, In R. M. Stogdill & A. E.Coons (Eds.) Leader Behavior: Its Descriptionand Measurement, 6-38.
  62. House, R. J. (1977). Theory of Charismatic Leadership. In J. G. Hunt and L. L. Larson (Eds), Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.
  63. Kane, J. S. & Lawler, E. E. (1976). Performance Appraisal Effectiveness: Its Assessment and Determinants, Research in Organizational Behavioral, 425-478.
  64. Likert, R. (1961). New Patterns of Management, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
  65. Milkovich, G. T. & Newman, J. M. (2002). Compensation (7th ed.). Boston: Irwin Mcgraw-Hill.
  66. Pervin, L.A. & John, O.P. (1997). Personality:theory and research.New York:John Wiley
  67. Rauch, C. F. & Behling, O. (1984). Functionalism: Basis for an Alternate Approach to The Study of Leadership, In Leaders and Managers: International Perspectives on Managerial Behavior and Leadership, Edited J. G. Hunt et al, New York: Elmsford.
  68. Robbins, S.P. (1998). Organizational theory: Structure, Design and applications,(5th ed.)Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 51.
  69. Scott, R. C. & Mitchell (1972). Productivity Improvement through better Management of Human Resources, Cost and Management, 49(1), 14-24.
  70. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
  71. Stogdill & Conns. (1957). Leader behavior: Its Description and Measurement, No. 88 Columbus, Ohio: Bureau of Business Research, The Ohio State University.
  72. Venkatraman, N., Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance on Strategy, 11(4), 801-814.
  73. Walter, H. (1973). Leadership style: Rigid or Flexible. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 35(1), 35-47.
  74. Wortzel (1979). Multivariate Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  75. Zimbardo, Philip. G. (1988) Psychological and Life, 12th ed, Stanford, CA: Harper Collins.