透過您的圖書館登入
IP:54.208.135.174
  • 學位論文

我國「金融檢查」與「財務隱私權」法制關連性之探討-以銀行業之監理為中心-

Study on the Correlation Between the Regulatory Schemes of “Financial Examination” and “Financial Privacy” in Taiwan-Focusing on the “Banking Supervision”

指導教授 : 謝易宏
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


論 文 摘 要 本論文之研究主題為「我國『金融檢查』與『財務隱私權』法制關聯性之探討-以銀行業之監理為中心」,目的在以銀行業為例,採取比較法之方式,檢討我國金融監理與檢查制度改進之道。並在主管機關實行金融檢查行為時,建構「銀行秘密」領域,使銀行客戶得享有財務隱私權,銀行得維持其對客戶之保密義務,其中涉及「衝突」與「妥協」之處,嘗試以公、私法領域作不同面向分析,並提出改革方向。 本論文之架構分為六章。 第一章說明本論文研究之動機、方法、限制與範圍。 第二章係以比較法之方式,檢視美國、德國及日本金融檢查實務現況,檢討我國金融監理與檢查制度之缺失,提出「依法行政」與「提升金檢效率」之建議。 第三章分析「財務隱私權」,以傳統隱私權為基礎,探討財務隱私權之內容,參酌美國「金融服務業現代化法案」與「財務隱私權法」,突顯出我國法制上的不足,期能提供為我國建立揭露財務資訊之正當法律程序之方向。 第四章說明銀行秘密領域的建構與銀行保密義務的維持,並引介美國之「銀行秘密法」,使財務隱私權與銀行秘密得以維持。 第五章以金融資訊之特殊性為主軸,分析行政法上「資訊公開」與金融法上「財務隱私權」、「銀行保密義務」的衝突,尋求槓桿上的平衡點,並針對金融檢查侵害權利的行為,分析救濟管道。 第六章結論係整合前述五章內容,提出五點改革芻議,希能對我國法制建構有所裨益。

並列摘要


Abstract This research primarily focuses on the correlation between “financial examination” and “financial privacy”, especially by adopting the comparative legal study method in order to discuss the reform of banking supervision in Taiwan. As the supervisory authority performing its financial examination, this paper intends to establish regulatory domain of bank secrecy, which not only entitle bank customers of obtaining their own financial privacy but maintain bank-customer obligations as well. Issues that involve “conflicts” and “reconciliation” will be further analyzed from both public and private law domain so as to furnish a tentative proposition for further improvement. The scheme of the research comprises six parts as follows: Part I illustrates the motives, methods, limitations and realm of this paper . Part II examines the real time practice of performing financial examination in advanced economies such as the United States, Germany and Japan on comparative legal study basis. By contrasting Taiwan’s current regulatory framework with those advanced experience, this research hereby proposes guidelines of “administration by the law” and “promoting efficiency of financial examination”. Part III analyzes “Right of Financial Privacy” through considering the updated United States’ Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 as well as “Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1992”, to protrude the inappropriateness of Taiwan’s regulation, inter alia, to suggest a due process of law while establishing financial disclosure system in Taiwan. Part IV depicts the balance between bank secrecy domain and banking obligations by introducing the United States’ “Bank Secrecy Act” so as to maintain the functional operation of financial privacy and bank secrecy in practice. Part V discusses the potential conflicts between “information disclosure”, as required by the administrative laws, and “financial privacy”, as required by the financial laws, by suggesting legal remedies of tortuous acts of rights to financial privacy in order to mediate the issues. Part VI concludes issues and propositions of this research and tentatively contours prospects of establishing Taiwan’s regulatory scheme of financial privacy .

參考文獻


15.洪燦輝編著,「徵信典範」,增訂版,中華徵信所企業股份有限公司印行,民國七十三年九月。
14.李科逸著,「網際網路之隱私保護」,載於資訊法務透析,民國八十八年三月出刊。
3. Lee, Lawrence L. C.
5.王志誠著,「論銀行之保密義務-兼評大法官會議釋字第二九三號解釋」,載於法律評論第六十一卷第三、四期合刊,民國八十四年四月。
47.陳戰勝著,「我國成立資產管理公司之探討-兼論中央存款保險公司之角色」,載於台灣金融財務季刊第一卷第二期,民國八十九年十二月。

被引用紀錄


周永福(2007)。金融機構專業責任保險之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846%2fTKU.2007.00643
魏武群(2008)。洗錢防制法上有關禁止處分制度之研究--以沒收保全為中心--〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu200800067
廖文華(2005)。金融機構公司治理之內部控制機制〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu200500103
李曜崇(2003)。從比較法觀點探討我國資訊防火牆 (中國牆)之法律佈局〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu200300172
王嘉銘(2002)。試論我國金融機構不良債權之處理機制-- 以台灣金聯資產管理股份有限公司為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu200200194

延伸閱讀