Title

軟性電路板新產品開發關鍵成功因素之探討

Translated Titles

The Key Success Factors of New Product Development in Flexible Printed Circuit Industry

Authors

梁振成

Key Words

軟性電路板 ; 新產品開發 ; 關鍵成功因素 ; 層級分析法 ; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) ; Key Success Factor (KSF) ; Flexible Printed Circuit (FPC) ; New Product Development

PublicationName

中原大學企業管理研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2009年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

邱榆淨

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

隨著全球生產基地及市場環境的變化,產品交期、彈性、品質及低成本已經成了企業競爭致勝的關鍵。軟性電路板運用於電子產品上,完全符合電子產品輕薄短小的發展趨勢,因此廣泛應用於PC及周邊產品、通訊產品、顯示器和消費性電子產品等領域。有鑒於現今軟性電路板廠必須即時反應客戶需求,在新產品設計與打樣過程中,經常會發生一些設計問題,造成產品驗證或打樣轉量產的延遲。產品設計的缺陷往往在生產過程中或樣品產出後才發現,通常只要發生一個致命性錯誤或者在競爭行列中無法在樣品認證期間送樣通過承認,就無法取得該產品的接單機會。 軟性電路板製造商在新產品投入打樣到轉量產期間,若是能在投產前針對客戶需求製造端及設計端分析,找出影響新產品開發關鍵成功因素,實為刻不容緩的研究課題,希望能夠提供軟性電路板產業在新產品開發時完整思維的參考。本研究目的在探討影響軟性電路板新產品開發的關鍵成功因素,並對軟性電路板產業新產品開發提出具體建議做法,使軟性電路板業者易於掌握其關鍵成功因素以達事半功倍之效益,順利接獲客戶訂單及提升企業技術能力。 依據國內外專家學者的理論基礎及相關文獻探討,並考慮產業本身特性,經由專家訪談彙整出組織文化、經營策略、新產品開發、研發管理、市場導向、財務能力、法規及環境議題七個構面,推展出25個相關準則,據以構建一個研究架構,再以此設計問卷的主要內容,再利用層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)來計算各項因素的權重值,以了解R&D(Research & Development)群體及製造群體在評估構面或評估準則的重視度及其異同。 研究結果顯示在構面中最重要的分別為「財務能力」、「經營策略」及「市場導向」。在評估準則中最為重要的部分為「財務管理能力」、「製造管理能力」、「正確的產品研發策略」、「產品製程設計能力」、「明確的開發目標」及「技術可行性評估」等六項。由此可知在軟性電路板產業中,設廠營運所需的財務能力必須要有一定規模以上的資金,在新產品開發過程中必須確立產品研發策略及目標,在新產品導入之初期評估所有生產要素(人、機、料、法、作業環境),新產品投產過程中再藉由製造管理能力來提升效率、品質及流程,進而降低成本從中獲取利潤。

English Abstract

With the global producing areas and the market environmental changes, the delivery of product, elasticity, quality and low-cost have become the victorious key of enterprise competition. Flexible Printed Circuit (FPC) which is used by electronic product conforms to the tendency of electron product that is short, thin and small; therefore, it generally applies on the computer and periphery product, communicates product, liquid crystal display and consumer electronics and so on. Forasmuch the factory of FPC must be react consumer’s requirement nowadays; it takes place some design problem during the new product design and sample run. What is more, the defection of the production always occurs after producing the product or sample. Consequently, it will lose the change to acquire the new order, as long as, the product design emerges the critical mistake or the product cannot acknowledge during the period of samples approval. During the period that FPC manufacturer decides the new product turn into the sample run to pilot run, it is urgent that the manufacturer should look for what the consumer requirement team and analysis the design team before investing the commodity, and then finding the effect of key success factors of new product development. This study offers comprehensive suggests about the producing commodity for FPC manufacturers. The purpose of this study is to probe into the key success factors of the new product in FPC industry. Furthermore, in order to let manufacturer successfully obtain more orders, and promote enterprise technical competence, some critical success factors for FPC manufacturers are proposal. According to domestic and foreign scholar’s theory, relative literature, the characteristic of industry and interviewing the experts, seven aspects are concluded. They are organizational culture, business strategy, new product development, research and management, market orientation, finance capability, law and environmental issues. And the research framework is constructed with the seven aspects and the twenty-five criteria. Moreover, we calculate the weightings of factors using Analytic Hierarchy Process in this study. The samples are including two groups, the Research & Development team and manufacturing team. The two groups have some similarities and differences between seven aspects and twenty-five criteria. Finally, the results of the study show the most important aspects are the finance capability, business strategy, and market orientation. And the most important criteria are financial management, product development capability, correct R&D strategy, product manufacture capability, explicit aim of developing new product, and technology feasibility evaluation. In conclusions, there is evidence that the finance capability for each manufacturer in Flexible Printed Circuit industry has to own funds that over the standard. Beside, manufacturer needs to establish product develop tactic and aim during the new product development process. In addition, at the initial stage of new product development, we should evaluate all manufacturing elements, for example people, machine, material, law, working environment. By means of manufacture capacity of management, we can promote efficiency, quality and process in order to reduce cost for obtaining more profit.

Topic Category 商學院 > 企業管理研究所
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 司徒達賢(1995),策略管理,台北,遠流。
    連結:
  2. 袁素萍(2003),企業轉型成功關鍵因素之研究,國立成功大學企業管理學系,碩士學位論文。
    連結:
  3. 許隆昌(2006),台灣IC基板產業關鍵成功因素之研究,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班,碩士學位論文。
    連結:
  4. 衛萬里、張文智(2005),運用模糊德爾菲與分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之研究,國立台灣科技大學設計研究所,設計學報,第10卷,第3期,第59-80頁。
    連結:
  5. Bart, C. K. (1999), Controlling New Products: A Contingency Approach, Journal of Technology Management, 18(5), pp.395-413.
    連結:
  6. Booz-Allen and Hamilton (1982), New Product Management for the 1980s, New York, Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc.
    連結:
  7. Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995), Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Direction, Academy of Management Review, 20(2), pp.343-378.
    連結:
  8. Chakrabarti, A. K. (1974), The Role of Champion in Product Innovation, California Management Review, 17(2), pp.58-62.
    連結:
  9. Cooper, R. G. (1980), Project NewProd: Factors in New Product Success, European Journal Marketing, 14(5/6), pp.277-292.
    連結:
  10. Cooper, R. G. (1983), The Impact of New Product Strategies, Industrial Marketing Management, 12(4), pp. 243-256.
    連結:
  11. Cooper, R. G. (1994), Debunking The Myths of New Product Development, Research Technology Management, 37(4), pp.40-50.
    連結:
  12. Cooper, R. G. and Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1995), Benchmarking the Firm’s Critical Success Factors in New Product Development, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), pp.374-391.
    連結:
  13. Cooper, R. G. and Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2007), Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors, Research Technology Management, 50(3), pp.52-66.
    連結:
  14. Ferguson, C. R. and Dickinson, R. (1982), Critical Success Factors for Directors in the Eighties, Business Horizons, 25(3), pp.14-18.
    連結:
  15. Dwyer, L. and Mellor, R. (1991), New product process activities and project outcomes, R&D Management, 21(1), pp.31–42.
    連結:
  16. Gobeli, D. H. and Brown, D. J. (1987), Analyzing Product Innovations, Research Management, 30(4), pp.25-31.
    連結:
  17. Leidecker, J. K. and Bruno, A. V. (1984), Identifying and Using Critical Success Factors, Long Ran¬ge Planning, 17(1), pp.23-32.
    連結:
  18. Lilly, B. and Porter, T. (2003), Improvement Reviews in New Product Development, R&D Management, 33(3), pp.285-296 .
    連結:
  19. Motwani, J., Kumar, A. and Mohamed, Z. (1996), Implementing QFD for Improving Quality in Education: An Example, Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 14(2), pp.149-159.
    連結:
  20. Rogers, E. M. (1983), Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed. New York, Free Press.
    連結:
  21. Saaty, T. L. (1980),The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw-Hill.
    連結:
  22. Song, X. M. and Parry, M. E. (1997), A Cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes: Japan and the United States, Journal of Marketing, 61(2), pp.1-18.
    連結:
  23. Veryzer, R. W. (1998), Discontinuous Innovation and the New Product Development Process, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, pp.304-321.
    連結:
  24. Yoon, E. and Lilien, G. L. (1985), New Industrial Product Performance: The Effects of Market Characteristics and Strategy, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2(3), pp.134-144.
    連結:
  25. 參考文獻
  26. 一、中文部分
  27. 大前研一(1985),黃宏義譯,策略家的智慧,台北,長河出版社。
  28. 方世榮譯(2003),Philips Kotler(2000),行銷管理學, 台北,東華。
  29. 台灣電路板協會(2006A),2005台灣電路板產業市場調查報告-2006年版,桃園市,台灣電路板協會。
  30. 台灣電路板協會(2006B),全球軟硬複合板市場與機會分析,桃園市,台灣電路板協會。
  31. 台灣電路板協會(2006C),大陸PCB產業與應用市場機會研究(光電板、汽車板、手機板),桃園市,台灣電路板協會。
  32. 白光華(2003),創新協同產品研發-PMD應用實務,汐止,中國生產力中心。
  33. 周文賢、林嘉力(2001),新產品開發與管理,台北,華泰。
  34. 周文賢(1999),行銷管理-市場分析與策略預測,台北,智勝文化。
  35. 金進興(2007),軟性電路板材料全書,桃園市,台灣電路板協會。
  36. 吳青松(1993),臺灣資訊電子業關鍵成功因素之探討-公司能力與聯盟策略之實證研究,臺大管理論叢,第4 卷,第1 期,第209-226頁。
  37. 吳思華(1988),產業政策與企業政策(初版),台北,中華經濟研究。
  38. 馬松淇(2007),軟性飲料業新產品開發成功因素之探討―Fuzzy AHP 之應用,國立中正大學企業管理研究所,碩士學位論文。
  39. 張書文、戴華亨譯(2006),產品設計與開發,台北,美商麥格羅.希爾出版社。
  40. 張保隆、陳文賢、蔣明晃、姜齊、盧昆宏、王瑞琛、黃明官(2006),生產管理三版,台北,華泰。
  41. 黃啟三(2005),新產品設計修訂一版,台北,全華。
  42. 黃營杉(1996),企業政策,台北,國立空中大學。
  43. 許君平(2004),新產品開發流程,國立中央大學機械工程研究所,碩士學位論文。
  44. 楊長林(2002),新產品開發:設計與定位、流程、績效評估之整合性管理研究,台灣科技大學工業管理系,博士論文。
  45. 陳姵蓉(2004),組織學習、組織創新與團隊成員運成模式互動對新產品開發績效之影響,高雄應用科技大學商務經營管理所,碩士學位論文。
  46. 陳仁鴻(2003),跨功能新產品開發團隊之衝突管理,輔仁大學管理研究所,碩士學位論文。
  47. 陳昭儀(1990),我國傑出發明家之人格特質、創造歷程及生涯發展之研究,國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所,碩士學位論文。
  48. 陳麗昭(2000),台灣個人發明人專利商品化歷程之研究,國立雲林科技大學企業管理研究所,碩士學位論文。
  49. 趙立隆(2003),失效模式與效應分析在全面生產管理之初期管理的應用—以台灣愛普生工業公司為例,朝陽科技大學工業工程與管理系,碩士學位論文。
  50. 鄧振源、曾國雄(1989),「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)」,中國統計學報,第27卷,第6期,第5-22頁。
  51. 鄧振源、曾國雄(1989),「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下)」,中國統計學報,第27卷,第7期,第1-20頁。
  52. 鄧振源(2005),計畫評估-方法與應用,基隆,海洋大學運籌規劃與管理研究中心。
  53. 蔣永明譯(2002),小島敏彥(1996),新產品開發管理-企業革新的生存之道,台北,中衛發展中心。
  54. 劉常勇(1999),中小科技企業研發策略與技術管理模式探討—以建準電機為例,1999年產業科技研究發展管理研討會案例暨論文集,第1卷,第107-135頁。
  55. 賴士葆、顏永森(1999),影響研發與製造互動關係因素之研究—以電腦監視器產品研發製造為例,1999年產業科技研究發展管理研討會案例暨論文集,第2卷,第143-158頁。
  56. 中國報告大廳市場研究報告網—2007-2008年FPC(軟性電路板)行業研究報告。http://big5.chinabgao.com/gate/big5/www.chinabgao.com/reports/37435.html
  57. 陳國華,淡江大學陳國華老師網站,未來研究的預測與研究方法。http://mail.tku.edu.tw/sochen/Link/CHAP6.htm
  58. 二、英文部分
  59. Aaker, D. A. (1984), Strategic Market Management, New York, John Wiley and Sons Inc.
  60. Adler, P. S. (1990), Share Learning, Management Science, 36(8), pp.166-188.
  61. Boynton, A. C. and Zmud, R. W. (1984), An Assessment of Critical Success Factors, Sloan Management Review, 25(4), pp. 17-27.
  62. Crawford, C. M. (1994), New Products Management, 4th ed., Homewood, Illions: Richard D. Irwin.
  63. Gilbert, J. T. (1995), Profiting from Innovation: Inventors and adopters, Industrial Management, 37(4), pp.28-32.
  64. Hofer, C. W. and Schendel, D. E. (1978), Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts, St. Paul, West Publishing.
  65. Levitt, T. (1966), Innovation Imitation, Harvard Business Review, September-October, pp.63-70.
  66. Rockart, J. F. (1979), Chief Executives Define Their Own Data Needs, Harvard Business Review, 57(2), pp.81-93.
  67. Saaty, T. L. (1990), Decision Making for Leaders, Pittsburgh, U.S, RWS Publications.
  68. Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, L. G. (1991), Prediction, Projection and Forecasting, Boston, U.S, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  69. Theodore, B. K. (1993), What’s QFD? Industry Week, 242, pp.31-32.
  70. Tushman, M. and Nalder, D. (1986), Organizing for Innovation, California Management Review, 28(3), pp.74-92.
Times Cited
  1. 鄒菀宜(2011)。大陸人士來台對台灣觀光商機評析之研究。臺北科技大學管理學院工業工程與管理EMBA專班學位論文。2011。1-71。 
  2. 陳淑萍(2010)。手機製造商垂直整合關鍵成功因素之研究。臺北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所學位論文。2010。1-104。