透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.220.114
  • 學位論文

區域航線航務風險因素分析-以航空公司首航班機為例

Flight Operations Risk Factors for Regional Routes:An Empirical Study of Airline Inaugural Flight

指導教授 : 王穎駿
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


近年來,國籍航空公司為了滿足兩岸及區域航線國際市場旅客需求,紛紛增闢新航點。在新聞媒體宣傳之際,首航班機往往需先面對先前準備作業及飛航駕駛員飛航陌生航程及航點之風險,在航務作業上具備極大挑戰;一旦相關作業發生疏失或外在威脅,將可能造成嚴重後果,因此良好的風險管理是維持飛航安全的必要條件,以提升航務運作層面。 本研究以IATA失事因素分類為架構,評估航空公司資深飛航駕駛員及簽派員對執行首航班機作業之風險。先透過業界專家問卷,以幾何平均數,進行各重要構面(潛在狀況、威脅、飛航組員疏失、非預期狀態、結束狀態、飛航組員對策、其他)及因素之確立。第二及第三階段則設計口語評估法問卷,調查及計算各構面風險因素下之重要及表現程度,並計算權重,作為首航班機風險評估之依據。另外,整合重要性-表現性分析(IPA)四個象限,規劃成保持執行組、重點改善組、次要改善組、彈性整合組四組管理策略,以進行風險管理。 研究發現,「威脅」是所有IATA失事分類中最為重要之構面,而所有構面內第一重要性因素,在重要性-表現性分析中也較多因素落在「保持執行組」,此結果符合現今存在風險因素之狀況,此一研究結果可供國籍航空業者開拓新航線之作業參考,以降低航空公司首航風險發生之機率。

並列摘要


In recent years, Taiwanese airlines have increased new waypoints in response to the international market demand for cross-strait and regional routes. The inaugural flight is pilots’ to confront unfamiliarity with the new routes on the operation. Any errors or threats could lead to irreparable consequences. Flight safety depends on good risk management, and is the key of overall quality of flight operations. International Air Transport Association Accident Classification Taxonomy is adopted in this study architecture. The purpose of this study is to focus on the senior airline pilot and flight dispatcher operation risk of inaugural flight. The first step is to establish the important dimensions through industry expert questionnaires. The second step is to design the verbal aggregation function questionnaire. The study calculates each weighted dimension and risk factors, based on inaugural flight risk assessment. In addition, for the flight operations of risk factors explore the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). The aim is to integrate the four groups of improvement-strategy like Keep up the good work, Possible Overkill, low priority for management and Concentrate here. Thus it will achieve the purpose of risk management. The results found that the "threat" dimension is the most important, the greater factor also fall on "keeping the execution group" of IPA matrix. Therefore the results is accordance with the current situation of the exist risk factors.

參考文獻


顏亦涵(2003)。知識管理活動中的風險評估--以軟體專案開發為例。國立台灣大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,台北市。
交通部運輸研究所(2013)。台北:交通部運輸研究所。
周萍芬、王穎駿(2014)。國際旅遊非傳統安全事件發生風險之研究。危機管理學刊,11(1),41-48。
王穎駿、劉毓珊(2013)。機坪勤務人員人為風險因素評估與策略,危機管理學刊,10(2),87-100。
徐華君、李倫文、許悅玲與李文進(2010)。應用「人為因素分析與歸類系統」與「飛安自願報告」分析空軍運輸機對潛在飛行風險,危機管理學刊,7,59-68。

延伸閱讀