Title

國中學生傳播科技概念診斷工具之發展

Translated Titles

Development of Diagnostic Test for Investigating Students' Concept of Communication Technology

Authors

楊宗翰

Key Words

傳播科技 ; 概念 ; 二階層診斷工具 ; Communication technology ; Cocept ; Two- tiered diagnostic test

PublicationName

臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2006年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

游光昭

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

在二十一世界裡,傳播科技產品與人類的生活息息相關,因此瞭解傳播科技的運作原理以及對社會的影響,實為科技教育中十分重要的一環。然而若在科技變動如此快速的時代中,追逐科技的變化,則教材的變動性會較頻繁,在內容的取捨上也較為困難。因此,採用概念式的教學方法,則教學上就較不會受到科技變動的影響,不斷地調整其教學內容。本研究旨在發展一套二階層傳播科技概念的概念診斷工具,以便能探究國中學生的傳播科技概念的認知情況。 本研究透過文獻探討定義出傳播科技概念的範圍以及修改Treagust二階層診斷工具之發展步驟,選取國中學生八年級三個班級共109人,作為資料蒐集的對象,發展二階層傳播科技概念診斷工具。工具發展完成之後並利用四個班級的學生共141人,進行傳播科技概念的診斷。本研究結論如下: (1) 國中自然與生活科技教科書中,各版本關於傳播科技概念的分配比例不同。總合來看,編碼與解碼的比例較高、傳送與接收次之、儲存與讀取的比例最低。 (2) 本診斷工具使用兩個階層來診斷學生的傳播科技概念,此診斷工具共計九大題包含十八小題,包含編碼與解碼、傳送與接收、儲存與讀取等三層面各三大題。 (3) 學生在傳播科技概念的平均答對比例未達三分之一,顯示學生對於傳播科技概念並沒有十分瞭解。然而學生會因為對題目中所提到的傳播科技產品較為熟悉如:電視、CD音樂光碟,而有較高的答對比例。

English Abstract

The study is to develop a two- tiered diagnostic test to investigate the junior high school students’ concept in communication technology. The diagnostic test was developed following three stages which included ten steps proposed by Treagust’s(1988) study. In order to collect students’ concepts in communication technology, there were 109 eighth grades junior high school students participated in the study. Finally, after analyzing stuednts’ response, the two-tired diagnostic test was developed. There were another 141 eighth-grade junior high school students participated to diagnosis their concept of communication technology. The conclusions were follows: (1) The conceptual proportion of communication technology is different in three different science and living technology text book. The content in coding / decoding occupies the highest propotion, then transmitting / receiving and storing / retrieving. (2) The diagnostic test can be used to diagosis students’ concept. This diagnostic test includes nine two-tiered multiple choice questions and related to coding / decoding, transmitting / receiving, and storing / retrieving. (3) The average correct answer rate in the test was less than one-third. This indicates that students don’t realize the concept of communication technology clearly. Students had higher correct answers rate in some questions which contain technology that are often used, such as TV, CD, etc.

Topic Category 科技學院 > 工業科技教育學系
工程學 > 工程學總論
社會科學 > 教育學
Reference
  1. 王明泉(1999)。概念形成學習策略在特殊教育上之應用分析。課程與教學,2(2),115-129。
    連結:
  2. 林達森(2003)。概念圖的理論基礎與運用實務。花蓮師院學報,17,107-132。
    連結:
  3. 邱美虹(2000)。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊,8(1),1-34。
    連結:
  4. 張春興(1998)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
    連結:
  5. 賴志?(1995)。圖文傳播界說。中學工藝教育,28(6),31-35。
    連結:
  6. Ausubel, D. P.(1968). Educational Psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    連結:
  7. Fisher, K. M. (1985). A misconception in biology: Aminoacids and translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(1), 53-62.
    連結:
  8. Hendricks, R., & Sterry, L. (1989). Communication technology. Menomonie, WI: University of Wisconsin-Stout.
    連結:
  9. Linn, M. C. (1987). Establishing a Research Base for Science Education:Challenges Trends and Recommendations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(2), 191-217.
    連結:
  10. Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (2000). Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego, London: Academic press.
    連結:
  11. Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. (1971). Communication of innovations. New York: Free.
    連結:
  12. Sanders, M. (1991). Communication technology. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
    連結:
  13. Theodorson, G. A. (1969). A modern dictionary of sociology. New York: Casswll.
    連結:
  14. Treagust, D. F., & Haslam, F. (1986). Evaluating secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. A paper presented at the 59th annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, California.
    連結:
  15. Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
    連結:
  16. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelingthe process of conceptual change [special issue]. Learning and instruction, 4, 45-69.
    連結:
  17. Wang, Jing-Ru. (2004). Development and Validation of a Two-Tier Instrument to Examine Understanding of Internal Transport in Plants and the Human Circulatory System. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 131-157.
    連結:
  18. 中文部份
  19. 尤丁玫(1994)。傳播科技分類之研究。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
  20. 方蘭生(1993)。傳播原理。台北:三民。
  21. 吳明隆(2005)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用。台北:知城。
  22. 邱美虹(2006)。科學概?學習研究:化學科─子計畫二:台灣地區中學生「?子與化學平衡」概?之心智模式與概?改變之研究(VI)(2/2)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC94-2511-S-003-010),未出版。
  23. 邱皓政(2005)。量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南。
  24. 康軒教育網(2006)。2006年11月25日,取自http://www.knsh.com.tw/relations/relations.asp
  25. 郭生玉(2000)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華。
  26. 郭重吉(1990)。學生科學知識認知結構的評估與描述。國立彰化大學學報,1,279-319。
  27. 游光昭、宗靜萍(2005)。傳播科技。載於李隆盛(主編),傳播科技概論(394-451頁)。台北:心理出版社。
  28. 黃台珠(1984)。概念的研究及其意義。科學教育月刊,66,165-177。
  29. 黃萬居(1993)。國小學生的概念構圖和自然科學學習成就之研究。台北市立師範學院學報,24,47-66。
  30. 盧秀琴(2003)。顯微鏡下的世界兩階層診斷式紙筆測驗的發展與效化。國立台北師範學院學報,16(1),112-136。
  31. 歐陽鐘仁(1987)。科學教育概論,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
  32. 鍾聖校(1990)。認知心理學,台北:心理出版社。
  33. 外文部份
  34. Brusic, S. A. (1990). Communication technology. In J. A. Liedtk (Ed.). Communication in technology education. Council on Technology Teacher Education. Mission Hills, CA: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
  35. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
  36. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Some features of children’s ideas and their implications for teaching. In R. Driver, E.Guesne,& A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science. Open University Press: Milton Keynes.
  37. Miller, G. A. (1951). Language and communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  38. Novak, J. D.,& Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Wandersee, J. H.,Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel(Ed.), Handbook of research on science teahing and learning (pp. 177-204). Macmillan Publishing Company.
Times Cited
  1. 陳嘉斌(2010)。網路同步學習對不同學習風格學生科技概念學習之影響。臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系學位論文。2010。1-85。