國中教師寫作評量回饋品質及其有效性之研究

The Quality and Validity of Feedback on Written Assessment from Junior High School Teachers

江健豪(Chien-hao Chiang)

指導教授 ： 林世華

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/教育心理與輔導學系/碩士(2009年)

摘要

本研究目的為了解國中教師寫作評量回饋之類型、品質與有效性：首先瞭解國內外寫作評分規準要點；其次從相關研究中找出良好回饋的原則；接著選擇出最能符合國中教師寫作評量回饋之歷程模式。在研究方法上，研究者蒐集到13位教師的作文評改樣卷，與協同分析者共同運用內容分析法對評語進行編碼。本研究之結果如下：（1）類型方面，共發現三大類13種評語類型。（2）品質方面，研究顯示出寫作評量回饋於投入性、均衡性、豐富性與具體性表現頗佳；鼓勵性則有待加強。（3）有效性方面，評語內容與基測寫作評分規準相關性頗高。最後，研究者針對所得結論，提出未來寫作評改、教學與研究之建議。

關鍵字

寫作評量 ； 寫作評量回饋 ； 評分規準

並列摘要

This study was designed to investigate the different types of feedback on written assessment given by Taiwanese junior high school teachers, as well as the quality and validity of this feedback. Current conceptualizations of how to construct rubrics and offer feedback were first reviewed, and a ‘best practice’ model for providing feedback was defined. Samples of writing test performances and feedback from teachers were collected from 13 teachers. The author and two co-analysts applied a content-analysis model to categorize the samples. Three types and thirteen kinds of feedback were revealed through this categorization process. Using the ‘best practice’ model to assess the feedback, it was found that the feedback generally met prevailing standards in terms of ‘investment’, ‘balance’, ‘variety’ and ‘tangibility’. However, it was found that feedback often appears to be lacking in ‘encouragement.’ Finally, the rubrics used by teachers were found to be highly relevant to the rubrics used in the Basic Competence Writing Test for Junior High School Students (BCTEST). Implications for pedagogy and suggestions for further research are offered.

並列關鍵字

writing assessment ； written assessment feedback ； rubric

參考文獻

研究發展中心。2009年1月6日，取自

Andrade, H. L., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. L. (2009). Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment and Self-Efficacy for Writing. Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287-302.

Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227-257.

Bitchener, J. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 409-431.

Chandler, J. (2003). The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error Feedback for Improvement in the Accuracy and Fluency of L2 Students Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.