Title

高一學生選組及其學業預測之研究-以自然組物理科為例

Translated Titles

Research on major choice and prediction about academic achievements for the first grade of senior high students.

Authors

李秉書

Key Words

性向 ; 興趣 ; 學業成就 ; 選組 ; 預測 ; aptitude ; interest ; academic achievement ; choosing major ; predict

PublicationName

臺灣師範大學物理學系在職進修碩士班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2002年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

陳文典

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本研究目的在於運用高一學生各科段考成績、性向及興趣測驗分數,來探討對高一學生文理選組的影響,並預測選組後物理科的學業成就。研究對象係臺北市某一所公立高中兩屆一共636位學生。性向及興趣測驗分數分別是採用「多因素性向測驗」及「大學入學考試中心興趣量表」兩種測驗所得的結果。而物理科學業成就是採用學校之段考成績以及臺北區大學入學聯合模擬考之物理成績。 本研究採用縱貫性研究法,並以兩屆學生作比較。所得之資料以單因子多變項變異數分析、T檢定、Pearson積差相關、逐步迴歸分析等統計方法處理後,研究結果如下: 一、對高一未分組或是對自然組的學生而言,性向和興趣測驗都具有顯著的性別差異現象。而物理科學業成就卻因學生屆別不同,而未必有顯著性別差異現象。 二、在性向與選組方面,若男生在機械推理、空間關係及抽象推理的分數較高,則將偏向於選擇自然組;但對女學生而言,性向與選組之間,並無顯著的關係。 三、男、女學生的自然組興趣類型都是一樣的,為實用型和研究型。 四、男、女學生的性向測驗和興趣測驗都無法預測物理科的學業成就;但是比較起來,性向測驗和物理科學業成就的相關性較興趣測驗為高。 五、男、女學生在高一的基礎物理和數學之段考成績,均可有效預測物理科學業成就;另外,對男生而言,國文科亦具有效的預測力。 六、興趣測驗和性向測驗之間的相關性甚低(γ<0.3);但男學生的性向對興趣的預測效果,較女學生為高。 七、綜合言之,興趣測驗和性向測驗適合於高中生選組之用,但與學業成就無必然關係;預測學科表現的有效工具,為關聯強度高的學科成就測驗。 最後,根據研究之結果,提出在教學上之建議及未來在研究上可改進的方向。

English Abstract

This study attempted to apply the scores on the aptitude, interest test and school monthly examinations of the first grade of senior high students to investigate the behavior of their majoring in physics, and to predict academic achievements in physics after the students choose physics as their major. We have 636 high school students chosen as the sample students including two grades from some public senior high schools in Taipei. The instruments used in this study are the Multi-factor Aptitude Test, the CEEC Vocational Interest Inventory, in addition to school monthly examinations and the Mock Examination, Test of the Joint Entrance Examination Taken by Public and Private Senior High Schools in Great Taipei Area for physics academic achievements. The research employed longitudinal method comparing with the students of two different grades. The data of this study are analyzed by one-way multivariate analysis of variance (one-way MANOVA), Student’s t-test, Pearson’s product-moment correlation and the multiple stepwise regression procedure, as well as the descriptive analysis method. The results are as follows: 1.Both before or after choosing major, there is significant sex/gender difference in aptitude and interest. After choosing major, there is no significant sex/gender difference in all physics academic achievements. 2.If male students gain higher test scores in mechanical reasoning, spatial relation, and abstract reasoning, they’ll tend to choose science major. For female students, there is no significant correlation between the aptitude and major choice. 3.For most students, the interest types for the students majoring in science include both realistic type and investigative type. 4.Most students’ aptitude and interest can’t predict physics academic achievements. The correlation between aptitude and physics academic achievements is higher than that between interest and physics academic achievements. 5.Most senior high first grade students’ scores on foundation physics and mathematics can predict effectively physics academic achievements. Especially for male students, Chinese test can also predict physics academic achievements. 6.The correlation between aptitude and interest is very low(γ<0.3). Male students’ aptitude has more effective prediction to interest than female students’. 7.In a word, interest test and aptitude test suit for the first grade of senior high to choose major, but not to predict physics academic achievements. The effective instrument to predict physics academic achievements is the high correlative academic achievement test. Finally, the study offers suggestions for further studies of education and research. Key Word: aptitude, interest, academic achievement, choosing major, predict

Topic Category 基礎與應用科學 > 物理
理學院 > 物理學系在職進修碩士班
Reference
  1. 吳鐵雄、陳淑美、張景媛(1994):中學興趣量表編製報告,教育心理學報,26,p107-124
    連結:
  2. 林幸台、金樹人、陳清平、張小鳳(1992):生涯興趣量表之初步編製研究,教育心理學報,25,p111-124
    連結:
  3. 林清山(1995):心理與教育統計學,東華書局
    連結:
  4. 邱美虹(2000):概念改變研究的省思與啟示,科學教育學刊,8(1),p1-34
    連結:
  5. 張春興(1991):張氏心理學辭典,東華書局
    連結:
  6. 張春興(1994):教育心理學,東華書局
    連結:
  7. Brown ,F.G.(1983):Principles of educational and psychological testing,New York:Holt
    連結:
  8. Fontao, Maria del Pilar Gonzalez(1997):Sex differences in academic performance and aptitudes for cognition,Perceptual and Motor Skills,85(3),p1031-1035
    連結:
  9. Gentner,D., Brem,S., Ferquson,R.W., Markman,A.B., Levidow,B.B., Wolff,P.,& Forbus,K.D.(1997):Analogical reasoning and conceptual change:A case study of Johannes Kepler,The Journal of the learning sciences,6(1),p3-40
    連結:
  10. Holland,J.L.(1985):Making vocational choices : a theory of vocational personalities and work environments,Englewood Cliff, NJ,Prentice-Hall
    連結:
  11. Jack A Naglieri(2001):Gender differences in Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, and Successive (PASS) cognitive processes and achievement,Journal of Educational Psychology,93(2),p430
    連結:
  12. M Gail Jones(2000):Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists,Science Education,84(2),p180
    連結:
  13. Mattern,N. (2002):Gender differences in science attitude-achievement relationships over time among white middle-school students,Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(4), p324
    連結:
  14. Perrone,P.A(1964):Factors influencing high school seniors’ occupationnel preference,Personnel and Guidance Journal,42,p976-980
    連結:
  15. 王文科(2002):教育研究法,五南圖書出版股份有限公司
  16. 田秀蘭(1996):我國高中學生職業興趣結構之比較研究,中華輔導學報,4,p69-93
  17. 吳裕益(1993):成就測驗和性向測驗之異同,高市文教,47,p39-41
  18. 李田英(1988):學習成就之性別差異,臺北師院學報,1,p119-130
  19. 林幸台(1988):性別因素、職業自我效能與職業選擇的關係:高一學生對職業的考量與選擇之研究,國立臺灣教育學院輔導學報,11,p71-94
  20. 林幸台(1994):高中學生職業興趣之認知因素研究,中華輔導學報,2,p180-206
  21. 林幸台、張啟文、張正夫、羅敏文(1998):高中數理資優學生與一般學生興趣類型之比較研究,特殊教育研究學刊,16, p367-378
  22. 林清山(1995):多變項分析統計方法,東華書局
  23. 邵瑞珍 譯(1995):教育的歷程,五南出版社
  24. 金樹人(1992):我國高中學生職業興趣結構分析,測驗年刊,39,p155-173
  25. 金樹人、林幸台、陳清平、區雅倫(2001):大學入學考試中心興趣量表使用手冊,財團法人大學入學考試中心基金會
  26. 倪亮(1959)譯:心理測驗之理論與實施(一)(二),中華文化出版事業社
  27. 郭重吉(1990):學生科學知識認知結構的評估與描述,彰化師範大學學報,1,p279-320
  28. 陳文心(1992):布魯納的“學習興趣”教育觀點述評,現代教育,7(28),p157-162
  29. 陳文典(1984):談課程設計與教學目標,中等教育,35卷6期,p19-20
  30. 陳文財(1995):高中學生物理解題之相關因素研究,國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文
  31. 陳怡君(1994):臺北區公立高中學生學習策略、學業興趣及性向與英、數兩科學業成就之關係,國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文
  32. 陰國恩、李洪玉、李幼穗(1996):非智力因素及其培養,浙江人民出版社
  33. 黃福來(1981):高中學生選組狀況及其影響因素,國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文
  34. 楊國樞、葛樹人(1980):心理測驗學,桂冠圖書股份有限公司
  35. 楊龍立(1996):國中學生性別因素、科學能力自我概念、三種對科學的態度之研究,臺北市立師範學院學報,27,p159-182
  36. 路君約、盧欽銘、歐滄和(1994):多因素性向測驗指導手冊,中國行為科學社股份有限公司
  37. 路君約、盧欽銘、歐滄和(1995):多因素性向測驗的編製,測驗年刊,42, p197-215
  38. 熊召弟、王美芬、段曉林、熊同鑫 譯(1996):科學學習心理學,心理出版社有限公司
  39. 蘇建文(1974):臺灣地區國中學生學科興趣之調查研究,中山學術文化集刊,13,p175-204
  40. 二、英文部份
  41. Anastasi,A.(1988):Psychological testing(6th ed.),New York:Macmillan
  42. Ausubel,D.P.(1968):Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View,New York:Holt,Reinhart and Winston
  43. Bennett,H.,Seashore,G.& Wesman,A.G.(1974):Manual for the Differential Aptitude Test(5th ed.),New York:The Psychological Corporation
  44. Brokaw,L.D.(1956):Technical school validity of the alrman Activity Inventory,AFPTRC Development Report,p56-109
  45. Bruner,J.S.(1960):The process of education : a landmark in educational theory(2nd ed.),Harvard University
  46. Campbell,D.P.(1974):Manual for the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory,Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press
  47. Darley,J.B. & Hagenah,T(1955):Vocational interest measurement,Minneapolis,Minn.:University of Minnesota Press
  48. E Margaret Evans(2002):Gender differences in interest and knowledge acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan,Sex Roles,47(3/4),p153-168
  49. Freeman,F.S.(1962):Theory and practice of psychological testing,New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  50. Nitko ,A.(1983):Educational tests and measurement:An introduction,New York:Harcourt Bruce Jovanovich
  51. Posner,G.J., Strike,K.A., Hewson,P.W.,& Gertzog,W.A.(1928):Accommodation of a scientific conception:toward a theory of conceptual change,Science education,66(2),p211-227
  52. Glynn,S.M. & Yeany,R.H. & Briton,B.K.(1991):The Psychology Learning Science,Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.
  53. Snow,R.E., Lyn,C. & Jackson III,D.(1996):Individual differences in affective and conative functions,In Berliner & Calfee’s “Handboook of Educational Psychology”,p243-310
  54. Walter Van Dyke Bingham(1936):Aptitudes and aptitude testing,New York,1st ed.,Harper & Brothers Publishers
Times Cited
  1. 林立婷(2007)。高中資優班性別少數學生學習經驗之探究。臺灣師範大學教育學系學位論文。2007。1-189。
  2. 陳建成(2010)。利用重複測度探討高中學生升學及在校學業表現之影響因素-某高中案例研究。臺北大學統計學系學位論文。2010。1-81。