透過您的圖書館登入
IP:34.227.112.145
  • 學位論文

理解式球類教學法與技能取向球類教學法比較研究

An Investigation of Teaching Games for UnderstandingModel Comparing with Technique Approach Model

指導教授 : 闕月清
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


理解式球類教學法與技能取向球類教學法比較研究 摘 要 本研究目的主要在探討理解式球類教學法(TGfU)與技能取向球類教學法對於學生的學習效果,並比較兩教學法學習效果之差異情形;本研究參與者為一位體育教師與兩班國小五年級男女生共62名分組(理解式球類教學組男生17人,女生17人;技能取向球類教學組男生14人,女生14人),兩組各實施8節手球課以瞭解男生與女生實施不同教學法前後於認知、情意、主觀技能、客觀技能及比賽表現能力等學習效果,並針對兩教學組學習後效果進行比較,以考驗兩教學法學習效果何者較佳;本研究方法採前實驗設計中兩個獨立單組前測-後測設計,對兩組男女生前後測成績分別進行相依樣本t考驗,另進行兩教學組後測成績之獨立樣本t考驗比較,研究結果如下:(一)技能取向教學組對於男生學習主觀技能上具有顯著的效果;(二)理解式球類教學組對於男、女生於情意與比賽表現的學習能產生顯著的效果;(三)技能取向教學組男生,主觀技能的學習效果進步程度明顯大於理解式球類教學組男生;理解式球類教學組男生在比賽表現能力上的學習,比實施技能取向教學組男生的學習效果佳。本研究結果可提供未來師資培育機構推行理解式球類教學法之依據,並建議研究者以不同年齡、球類或兩教學法結合作縱貫性研究、或增加質性研究。

並列摘要


An Investigation of Teaching Games for Understanding Model Comparing with Technique Approach Model Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning effects of the Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) model and Technique Approach model. The participates were a physical education specialist and his two classes of 62 fifth grade students (TGfU group with 17 male and 17 female students. Technique Approach group with 14 male and 14 female students). Data were collected from eight-classes of handball PE lessons taught with two models. Pretests and posttest were administered for handball cognitive achievement, subjective and objective skill achievement, affective achievement and game performance, and the data were analyzed by both independent-samples t-test and paired-samples t-test. The results were as follows: 1.There were significant differences in subjective skill evaluation for male students from the Technique Approach model. 2. There were significant differences in affective questionnaire evaluation and game performance evaluation for male and female students from Teaching Games for Understanding model. 3. Male students from the Technique Approach model improved more in subjective skill evaluation than the males meets in Teaching Games for Understanding model; and the male students from Teaching Games for Understanding model make more improvement in game performance evaluation than the male students of the Technique Approach model. It was suggested that the results from this study could support the curriculum of TGfU in the teacher education. Future studies should consider different ages, different ball games, and combination of the two models, using longitudinal and qualitative approach.

參考文獻


周宏室(2001)。Mosston體育教學光譜的理論與應用。台北:師大書苑。
郭生玉(1981)。心理與教育研究法。台北。精華書局。
蔡宗達、闕月清(2003)。逆向思維的新體育教學-理解式教學法(TGFU)。中華民國大專院校九十二年度體育學術研討會專刊,(上),252-261頁。台北縣。國立體育學院。
Keh, N. C., Tsai, T. D., & Huang, C. C. (2003). Teachers’Perceptions of and Attitudes towards Teaching Games for Understanding [Abstract]. Book of Abstracts (p.18 ). Melbourn, Australia: 2nd International Conference: Teaching Sport and Physical Education for understanding.
Bloom, B. S.(1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I : Cognitive Domain, N. Y. : Mckay Co. Inc

被引用紀錄


許睿元、掌慶維(2012)。國小學童樂樂足球遊戲型式之探討中華體育季刊26(3),361-369。https://doi.org/10.6223%2fqcpe.2603.201209.1511
游淑霞(2005)。理解式球類教學法對高中生合球學習效果之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2004200715121144
吳其達(2006)。理解式球類教學對國小五年級學生排球學習效果之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716100055
黃品瑞(2006)。理解式球類訓練法於國小籃球校隊訓練之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716123525
簡銘成(2006)。理解式球類教學法對國中生排球學習效果之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716102062

延伸閱讀