透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.146.35.203
  • 學位論文

社會責任指數與邪惡指數投資績效

A Study of Investment Performance Evaluation of Social Responsibility Index and Evil Index

指導教授 : 吳克 彭開瓊

摘要


隨著環保意識的提升,大家對於「社會責任」議題逐漸重視,然而投著者對於標地物則是持有不同的態度。「社會責任指數」指出投資者會以注重勞資關係、尊重人權、重視環保、生產安全有益產品及減少資源耗竭的公司證券為其投資標的。「邪惡指數」則是專門投資菸草、酒類、賭博、軍火等相關證券。 本研究以貝它係數、標準差、夏普指數及一年年均報酬率、三年年均報酬率、五年年均報酬率加以分析。統合彙整以上的分析數據,找出相對表現較佳的基金商品,並採用變異數、歷史模擬法與蒙地卡羅模擬法計算出風險值,提供給投資人參考投資方向。 以 來看,ISE邪惡指數的數值較大,其值為0.009331,而Clvrt社會責任指數的數值較小為-0.000390,表示ISE邪惡指數報酬超越大盤之預期報酬最佳。就 而言,Clvrt社會責任指數之 值1.097230,表示S&P 500整體股價指數上漲100%時,Clvrt社會責任指數的價格將同時上漲109.723%;ISE邪惡指數基金之 值0.785525,表示整體股價指數上漲100%時,ISE邪惡指數基金的價格將同時上漲78.55%。 在空頭時期,Clvrt社會責任指數與ISE邪惡指數之年化報酬率介於-11.986%∼-10.376%,年化標準差介於6.35%∼6.66%,貝它指數介於0.72∼1.12,夏普指數介於-0.1968∼-0.3837,風險值介於4.67%∼4.97%;在多頭時期,Clvrt社會責任基金與ISE邪惡指數基金之年化報酬率介於10.03%∼24.24%,年化標準差介於2.74%∼3.29%,貝它指數介於0.91∼1.0738,夏普指數介0.2039∼0.4825,風險值2.089%∼2.097%。以風險值來看,在空頭市場與多頭市場皆是以ISE邪惡指數較Clvrt社會責任指數良好。

並列摘要


With the enhancement of environmental awareness of all the "social responsibility" and that gradually importance, however, the subject of investors to invest is a different attitude. "Index of social responsibility," pointed out that investors will focus on labor-management relations, respect for human rights, attention to environmental protection and reduce the depletion of natural resources for its investment in securities of companies subject, while the "evil index" is devoted to investment in tobacco, alcohol, arms and other related securities aggregate index. The purpose of this study were beta coefficient, standard deviation, Sharpe index and an average annual rate of return a year or three years at an average annual rate of return analysis. Integration to aggregate data from the above analysis to identify a better index of the relative performance of commodities, and the use of variance, historical simulation and Monte Carlo simulation method to calculate VaR, provided to investors, investment direction reference. In the short period of time, Clvrt social responsibility evil ISE index and the average annual index return between -28.5% -12.8%, the annual standard deviation of between 22% ~ 23%, the risk value is between 0.1314 ~ 0.1963; in the long period of time , Clvrt Social Responsibility Fund and evil ISE index funds at an average annual rate of return of between 9.64% ~ 22% of the standard deviation was between 9.5% ~ 11.4%, the risk value is between 0.0410 ~ 0.0949.

參考文獻


一、中文部份
1.卞孝全,「以模糊多準則決策分析建構企業社會責任基金並評估其績效」,私立中原大學,碩士論文,民國九十六年。
2.王佳真,「風險值觀念的介紹與運用-以台灣股票市場為例」,國立臺灣大學,碩士論文,民國八十七年。
3.王明祥,「風險值模型之匯率實證研究」,國立臺灣大學,碩士論文,民國九十七年。
4.王德仁,「風險值評估之統計方法與實證研究」,國立台北大學,碩士論文,民國八十八年。

被引用紀錄


劉彥杰(2012)。企業社會責任之績效分析:以富邦台灣企業社會責任基金為研究對象〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613503642
張勝強(2012)。跳繩運動對美術班學童健康體適能之影響-以台南縣新進國小為例〔碩士論文,亞洲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0118-1511201215464182
吳長祐(2013)。上肢重複性工作與休息時間安排對於肌肉疲勞恢復之研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2712201314041927

延伸閱讀