Title

網路口耳相傳訊息特性與涉入程度及使用經驗對消費者說服效果之影響

Translated Titles

The Influences of Word-of-Mouth Message Characteristics, Message Involvement and Usage Experience on Persuasion on Web

Authors

簡銘宏

Key Words

先前使用經驗 ; 口耳相傳 ; 順序效果 ; 清晰度 ; prior usage experience ; word-of-mouth ; order effect ; vividness

PublicationName

崑山科技大學企業管理研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2006年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

留淑芳

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

廣告與口耳相傳是現今行銷人員公認最具影響力的兩大行銷工具,尤其隨著網際網路的發展,消費者現今已可透過網路上釵h的討論區、電子佈告欄及留言版得知更多訊息。其中,網路留言版已經深入每一個人的生活,但究竟有多少網路留言能真正吸引消費者的注意,甚至引起其購買意願。 本研究將探討正負面訊息不同排列順序與留言版訊息清晰度兩大變數對消費者的影響。自變數為訊息順序(先正後負 vs. 先負後正)與訊息清晰度(清晰 vs. 非清晰)為操弄變數,訊息涉入(高 vs. 低)及先前使用經驗(老手 vs. 生手 )為干擾變數,分成四個實驗組,以手機為實驗產品。所得之結論如下: 一、先正後負的態度優於先負後正的態度,故整體而言初始效果是顯著的。 二、訊息清晰度高的說服效果優於清晰度低者。 三、高度訊息涉入下,清晰訊息的說服效果顯著優於非清晰訊息,低度訊息涉入下,兩者說服效果差異是不顯著的。 四、 當訊息接受者為高度訊息涉入時,留言的初始效果與新近效果不顯著; 但低度訊息涉入下,留言的新近效果顯著優於初始效果。 五、訊息順序對說服效果的顯著程度,不會隨著「先前使用經驗」之不同而有所差異。 六、消費者先前產品的使用經驗愈少,訊息表達愈清晰則說服效果越大;反之,先前產品的使用經驗愈多,訊息表達愈清晰則說服效果為不影響。

English Abstract

Advertising and word-of-mouth (WOM) has become the most powerful marketing tools in marketing people’s view now. Especially,consumer can seek even more messages via Internet, online chat forum and BBS today. One of them, message board has already involved in everyone’s living.how many message can not only really catch consumer’s attention, but also engage in their purchasing intentions.  As a result, our research considered the influences of order effect and message vividness on consumer’s effects.Our research considered the influences of message order ( pro/con vs. con/pro) and message vividness (vivid vs. pallid) served as independent variables, and consumer's message involvement(high vs.low) and prior usage experience(expert vs. novice ) served as moderator. resulted in 4 experimental groups.The experiment product was cellular phone. The conclusions are as follows: 1.Attitudes in the pro/con condition are better than that in the con/pro condition, implicating a primacy effect of pro message. 2. Vivid message has better persuade effect than pallid message.  3.When message vivid, attitude of high involvement is better than that of low involvement; when the message pallid , the attitude are non-significance. 4.When message accepter are high involvement ,the effect are are the non-significance in primacy effect and recent effect. When message accepter are low involvement , the effect of primacy effect is better than that of recent effect. 5.The significance degrees of message order to persuasion effect will not different based on prior usage experience. 6.When message accepter are novice ,the effect are the significance in vivid message ; When message accepter are expert , the effect are non-significance .

Topic Category 商業管理學院 > 企業管理研究所
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 【3】 W.Mangold, F. Miller, and G.Brockway, “Word-of-Mouth Communication in the Service Marketplace,” The Journal of Services Marketing ,Vol.3,1999, pp.73-88.
    連結:
  2. 【6】 L.G Schiffman,.and L.F.Kanuk, “Consumer Behavior, ”, 4th ed,Prentice- Hall.Ine. William,T.G,Consumer Behavior, lth ed, 1982.
    連結:
  3. 【7】 D. Herr, M. Paul, R. Frank, G.Kardes and J. Kim, “Effects of Word-of Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility- Diagnosticity Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, 1991, pp. 454-462.
    連結:
  4. 【8】 D.Gelb, Betsy and Suresh Sundaram , “Adapting to Word of Mouse, ” Business Horizons, summer, 2002, pp. 21-25.
    連結:
  5. 【9】 J. Frenzen and K. Nakamoto, “Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Marker Information, ” Journal of Consumer Research, December,1993, pp. 360-375.
    連結:
  6. 【10】 B.Bickart, and R.Schindler, “Online Forums as Influential Sources of Consumer Information”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2001,pp. 31-52.
    連結:
  7. 【11】 S. Godin, and D. Fesenmaier, “Preparing for the New Economy: Advertising Strategies and Change in Destination Marketing” ,1999 , No35.
    連結:
  8. 【15】B.Meyerowitz, and S.Chaiken, “The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior,”Journal of personality and Social Psychology, Vol 52, 1987, pp. 500-510.
    連結:
  9. 【16】I.Levin and G.. J.Gaeth, “How consumer are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, 1988, pp. 269-278.
    連結:
  10. 【17】K. Buttle and M.Francis, “Servqual: Review, Critique, Research Agenda,” European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 30, No .30, 1997,pp. 8-32.
    連結:
  11. 【18】V. Knauer, “Increasing Customer Satisfaction,” United States Office of Consumer Affairs, 1992 .
    連結:
  12. 【19】 W.G. Mangold, F. Miller, and G.R.Brockway, “Word-of-Mouth Communication in the Service Marketplace,” The Journal of Services Marketing,Vol.13, 1999,pp. 73-88.
    連結:
  13. 【20】M. L.Richins, “Negative Word-of-Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: A Pilot Study, ” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47,1983, pp. 68-78.
    連結:
  14. 【23】J. M.Feldman and J. G. Lynch, “Self-generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior, ”Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 73, 1988, pp. 421-435.
    連結:
  15. 【24】J. Kisielius, and B. Sternthal , “Detecting and Explaining Vividness Effects in Attitudinal Judgments,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 21, 1984,pp. 54-64.
    連結:
  16. 【25】A. L. McGill and P.Anand, “ The Efect of Vivid Attributes on the Evaluation of Alternatives: The Role of Differential Attention and Cognitive Elaboration, ” Journal of Consumer Research,Vol.16, 1989, pp. 188-196 .
    連結:
  17. 【27】J.Arndt, “Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product, ” Journal of Marketing Research,Vol. 4,August, 1967, pp. 291-295.
    連結:
  18. 【28】R.W.Mizerski, “ An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfovorable Information, ” Journal of Consumer Research,Vol.9,Decmber ,1982, pp.301-310.
    連結:
  19. 【29】P.Wright, “The Cognitive Processes Mediating Acceptance of Advertising, ” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.10, 1973, pp. 53-62.
    連結:
  20. 【30】K.Unnava, H.Rao, L.Burnkrant, E. Robert and P.Erevelles, Sunil “Effects of Presentation Order and Communication Modality on Recall and Attitude,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21, 1994, pp. 481-490.
    連結:
  21. 【31】B.Buda and Zhang, “Consumer Product Evaluation: The Interactive Effect of Message Framing, Presentation Order, and Source Credibility, ”Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2000, pp. 229- 238.
    連結:
  22. 【32】 T.Buda, Richard “The Interactive Effect of Message Framing, Presentation Order, and Source Credibility on Recruitment Practices,” International Journal of Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2003, pp. 156-163.
    連結:
  23. 【33】C. P.Haugtvedt and D. T. Wegener, “Message Order Effects in Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Perspective, ”Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21, 1994, pp. 205-218.
    連結:
  24. 【34】C. W. Hovland and E. H. Mandell,“The Influence of Source Credibility of Communication Effectiveness,”Public Opinion Quarterly,Vol.15,Winter, 1951-52,pp. 635-650.
    連結:
  25. 【35】C. W. Hovland, E. H.Mandell, “Order of presentation in persuasion,” CT: Yale University Press,1957
    連結:
  26. 【36】G.Lana, “Familiarity and the Order of Presentation of Persuasive Communications,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,Vol.62, 1961,pp.573-577.
    連結:
  27. 【37】G.Lana, E.Robert, “Controversy of the Topic and the Order of Presentation of Persuasive Communications,” Psychological Reports, Vol.12, 1963,pp.163-170.
    連結:
  28. 【38】 E.Jones and G. Goethals, “Negativity in Evaluations. In Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior ” ,1972, pp. 47-62.
    連結:
  29. 【39】M.Herr and F.Kardes “Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-DiagnosticityPerspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.17 March, 1991,pp. 455-462.
    連結:
  30. 【40】B.Unnava, U.Rao, Burnkrant, E.Robert and D.Erevelles, “Effects of Presentation Order and Communication Modality on Recall and Attitude,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21, 1994, pp. 481-490.
    連結:
  31. 【42】H.Paivio, L. Allan, “Picture Superiority in Free Recall: Imagery or Dual Coding? ” Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1973 ,pp.176-206.
    連結:
  32. 【43】R.Snodgrass, G.Joan and A.Anthony, “The Pictorial Superiority Effect in Recognition Memory,” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1977, pp.1-4.
    連結:
  33. 【45】D’ Agostino, R.Paul and Kenneth G. Small, “Cross-Modality Transfer Between Pictures and Their Names,” Canadian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1980, pp.113-118.
    連結:
  34. 【46】V. M.Holmes and J. Langford, “Comprehension and Recall of Abstract and Concrete Sentences,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1976,pp. 559-566.
    連結:
  35. 【47】J. A. Schnorr, and R. C. Atkinson, “Repetition Versus Imagery Instructions in the Short-and Long-Term Retention of Paired Associates,” Psychonomic Science, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1969,pp.183-184.
    連結:
  36. 【48】D.Bower and H.Gordon, “Imagery as a Relational Organizer in Associative Learning,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol.9, No.5, 1970,pp. 529-537.
    連結:
  37. 【49】Nisbett,and L.Ross , “Human Inference Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgments, ” NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980
    連結:
  38. 【50】Kisielius and Sternthal,Brian, “Detecting and Explaining Vividness Effects in Attitudinal Judgments,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 21, No. 1, February, 1984 ,pp. 54-64.
    連結:
  39. 【52】R.Petty, J.Cacioppo, “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement, ” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.10 No2, 1983, pp.135-146.
    連結:
  40. 【53】L.Wood, D.Wendy and R.Kallgren, A.Carl, and Preisler, Rebecca Mueller, “Access to Attitude-Relevant Information in Memory as a Determinant of Persuasion: The Role of MessageAttributes,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 21, 1985 ,pp. 73-85.
    連結:
  41. 【54】L.Swasy John and J.Arno Rethans,“Knowledge Effects on Curiosity and New Product Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, Vol.15 No.4, 1986,pp.28-34.
    連結:
  42. 【55】R.Petty, J.Cacioppo, “Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective, ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.51, 1986, pp.1032-1043.
    連結:
  43. 【56】 L. J.Zuwerink and G. P.Devine, “Attitude important and resistance to persuasion: It's not just the thought that counts,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.70, No.5, 1996,pp. 931-944.
    連結:
  44. 【57】P.Malaviya, “The Effect of Type of Elaboration on Advertisement Processing and Judgment, ” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33, 1996 ,pp. 410-421.
    連結:
  45. 【60】 F.Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12, No.3 December ,1985, pp. 341-352.
    連結:
  46. 【63】M.E.Slama and A.Tashchian, “Selected Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics Association with Purchasing Involvement,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, 1985, pp.72-82.
    連結:
  47. 【64】R.Celsi,and J.Olson, “The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes,”Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15,September, 1988,pp.210-224.
    連結:
  48. 【66】C.Park, and S.Young, “Consumer Response toTelevision Commercials: the Impact of Involvement and Background Music on Brand Attitude Formation”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.23, No.1, 1986, pp.11-24.
    連結:
  49. 【68】R.E.Petty, J. T.Cacioppo, “Communication and Persuasion:Central and Eripheral routes to attitude change, ”New York: Springer Verlag, Vol. 52, 1986,pp.223-256
    連結:
  50. 【69】D. Maheswaran and J. Meyers-Levy, “The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 27, No. 3, August 1990, pp. 361-367.
    連結:
  51. 【70】D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, March 1979, pp. 263-291.
    連結:
  52. 【71】H.E.Krugman, “The Impact of Television Advertising; Learning Without Involvement, ” Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 2,Fall, 1965,pp.349-356.
    連結:
  53. 【72】R.Laczniak,D.Muehlingand S.Grossbart, “Manipulating Message Involvement in Advertising Research,” Journal of Advertising,Vol.18,No2, 1989,pp28-38.
    連結:
  54. 【73】J .Hoch, “Product experience is seductive,” Journal of Consumer Research,Vol. 29, Iss. 3, December ,2002 ,pp. 448-454.
    連結:
  55. 【74】J.Alba, and J.Hutchinson , “Dimensions of consumer expertise, ” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.13 ,No.4, 1987, pp.411-454.
    連結:
  56. 【75】D.Vakratsas, and T.Ambler, “How Advertising Works: What Do We Really Know? ,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63, No.1, 1999 , pp. 26-43.
    連結:
  57. 【76】E.Moore, and R.Lutz, “Children Advertising and Product Experiences, ”Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 27, June, 2000, pp. 31-48.
    連結:
  58. 【77】J.Bettman, and M.Sujan, “Effect of Framing on Evaluations of Comparable and Noncom parable Alternatives by Expert and Novice consumers,”Journal of Consumer Research,Vol.14, 1987,pp.141-154.
    連結:
  59. 【78】C.Mervis and E. Rosh, “Categorization of Natural Objects,” Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.32, 1981,pp. 89-115.
    連結:
  60. 【81】W.Rosen, “Working memory capacity and suppression,” Journal of Memory and Language. Vol. 39, pp. 418-436.
    連結:
  61. 【84】R.Smith and W.Swinyard, “Attitude-behavior consistency: the impact of product trial versus advertising”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 20, 1983, pp. 257-267.
    連結:
  62. 【85】Hoch and Ha, “Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1986,pp. 221-233.
    連結:
  63. 【86】Deighton, Henderson, and A. Neslin, “The Effects of Advertising on Brand Switching and Repeat Purchasing, ” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.16, 1994 ,pp. 28-43.
    連結:
  64. 【87】C. W. Park, and P. Lessig , “Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, No2, 1981,pp.223- 230.
    連結:
  65. 【1】 Rosen Emanuel著, 口碑行銷-如何引爆口耳相傳的神奇威力,林德國譯,遠流出版公司,2001。
  66. 【2】 留淑芳,“網路口耳相傳訊息特性及接受者行為特質對態度形成之影響,博士論文,商學研究所,國立台灣大學,2002。
  67. 【4】 鄭佩玲,“口耳相傳效果對消費者行為的影響,碩士論文,國際貿易學所,國立政治大學,2001。
  68. 【5】 M.Richins, and R.Terri, “The Role of Involvement and Opinion Leadership in Consumer Word-of-Mouth: An Implicit Model Made Explicit , ” Advances in Consumer Research , Vol.15, 1988, pp.32-36.
  69. 【12】林清州,“廣告訊息正反性、廣告主可信度、訊息涉入與廣告效果之關係”,碩士論文,企業管理研究所,政治大學,1992。
  70. 【13】梁文傑,“訊息正反性、訊息來源可信度與訊息涉入對廣告效果關係之研究”,碩士論文,商學研究所,臺灣大學,1992。
  71. 【14】葉亮吟,“訊息正反性和廣告主可信度對兒童廣告效果之研究”,碩士論文,企業管理研究所,臺灣科技大學,1999。
  72. 【21】邱建智,“負面口碑訊息對於消費者購買決策影響之探討”,碩士論文,企業管理所,國立台灣科技大學,2000。
  73. 【22】D.Goodman, “The Natureof Custome Satisfaction ,”Quality Pogress ,February 1989, pp.37-40.
  74. 【26】練乃華、留淑芳,“口耳相傳訊息之傳播及對消費者購買行為之影響:文獻回顧與評論”,中山管理評論,第11卷,第2期,2003年夏季號,第283-307頁。
  75. 【41】Mathews, Jay , “Bells, Whistle and Bottle Battles, At Christmas,Agencies Play a High-Tech Game of Can You Top This? ” December 13, 1994.
  76. 【44】E.Lutz and R.Lutz, “Imagery-Eliciting Strategies:Review and Implications of Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, 1978, pp. 611-620.
  77. 【51】施淑芳,“資訊式廣告效果研究:以閱聽人之既存態度、廣告訊息涉入度與訊息論點品質為探討”,碩士論文,廣告學研究所,國立政治大學,2000。
  78. 【58】F.James Engel, D.Roger Blackwell and Paul W. Miniard, “Consumer Behavior, ”Dryden Press,1995.
  79. 【59】M.Sherif and H.Cantril, “The Psychology of Ego-Involvement, ”NY: John Wiley and Son,1947.
  80. 【61】D. S. Day, “Are Consumers Satisfied?” in Consumerism: Search for the
  81. Consumer Interest, Eds. D.A. Aaker and G.S. Day, 3rd edition, New York: Free
  82. Press, 1978,pp. 406-417.
  83. 【62】R.Laakson, Pirjo, “Consumer Involvement:Concept and Research”,1994.
  84. 【65】D.Cohen, and B.Joe,“Involvement and You: 1000 Great Ideas,” Advances in Consumer Research Vol.10 ,1983,pp. 325-328.
  85. 【67】R. Batra, and M. Ray , “Operationalizing Iinvolvement as Depth and Quality of Cognitive Response,”Advances in consumer research, Vol.5, 1983, pp. 309-313.
  86. 【79】J. D.Bransford, A. L. Brown, and Cocking,How expert differ from novices. How People Learn:Brain,Mind, Experience, and School, 2000, pp.31-33.
  87. 【80】A.Searleman, and D.Herrmann, “Memory from a Broader Perspective, ” NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994 ,pp. 295-321.
  88. 【82】Newman and R.Staelin, “Information Source of Durable Goods,” Journal of Advertising Research , 1973,April, pp.19-29.
  89. 【83】Katona and Mueller, “A Study of Purchase Decisions in Consumer Behavior: The Dynamics of Consumer Reaction. Lincoln H. Clark, ” New York: New York University Press, 1995, pp. 30-87.