Title

台灣文化創意產業組織創新之研究--歷程理論觀點

Translated Titles

A Study on Organizational Innovation of Cultural /Creative Industry in Taiwan ─ with the Perspective of Process Theory

Authors

蔡振仲

Key Words

文化創意產業 ; 組織創新 ; 事後回溯研究法 ; 深度訪談法 ; 組織創新歷程 ; Organizational Innovation ; In-depth interview、Post hoc research. ; Cultural/Creative Industry ; Process Model of Organizational Innovation

PublicationName

崑山科技大學企業管理研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2006年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

余光華;莊立民

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

文化創意產業乃二十一世紀全球新興主流產業,其創新歷程在組織創新環節中,扮演關鍵性角色,惟目前國內探討「組織創新歷程」之研究並未多見,對文化創意產業的組織創新歷程,更鮮少著墨。 本研究採用質性研究方法,運用階段/歷程之研究取向,並以Amabile的「組織創新歷程模式」為理論基礎,針對台灣核心文化創意產業做多重個案分析,並以事後回溯研究、深入訪談、及三角測量等方法,分析並建構其組織創新之階段與歷程模式,藉以瞭解文化創意產業組織創新所經過之思慮模式與作為方法,以及找出影響文化創意產業組織創新歷程之重要因素。 研究發現,文化創意產業的組織創新歷程階段與Amabile的組織創新歷程階段模式有所差異,Amibile認為議程設定為組織創新之首要步驟,本研究卻顯示創意的產生才是文化創意產業組織創新的第一過程,其內容包含了關鍵人物與創造力;又研究顯示,影響組織創新之最重要原因為個人因素,其次為環境與組織因素,此則與Amibile所強調的個人創造力是組織創新之最主要原因互相契合。 除了建構文化創意產業組織創新歷程模式及找出組織創新歷程之影響因素外;本研究另將針對研究結果,推論出台灣文化創意產業組織創新歷程之相關命題,並對文化創意產業經營者提供多項創新意涵建議,期使台灣文化創意產業在組織創新的階段過程中有所依附遵循,進而在組織創新的歷程中精進萃鍊,達成文化深耕與創意加值的產業目標。

English Abstract

For twenty-first century, Cultural/Creative Industry has becoming the main industry which is the emerging stream of the world. With the key point of role of linking for innovational process of organizational innovation, although, there were few studies which focused on the theory of stage of organizational innovation, not to mention the Organizational Innovation of Cultural /Creative Industry. Using the method of qualitative research, operating the intention of process/stage theory,our research based on the theory of process of organizational innovation constructed by Amabile. In order to built the process/stage model of organizational innovation, with the methods of post hoc research, in-depth interview, triangulation and multi-analysis for the core cultural /creative industry of Taiwan, to realize the passing way of thinking and running model of organizational innovation of cultural/creative industry to find out the significant factors which affected the organizational innovation of cultural/creative industries. As the findings, process of organizational innovation of cultural / creative industries was different from the model which Amabile constructed. Amabile set the subject setting as the first stage on organizational innovation, however, our research indicated that creative appearance is just the first step for organizational innovation of cultural /creative industries, included both of key character and creative ability, moreover, this research showed that the individual factor was the most important element on organizational innovation, and the environment factor was the second, the last was the factor of organization. The result that was to match the point which theory was provided by Amabile whose study emphasized that the main reason of organizational innovation was individual creative ability. Besides, after constructed the process model of organizational innovation of cultural/ creative industry and find out the mainly affecting factor on organizational innovation, our research attempted to offer some useful subjects for organizational innovation of Taiwan’s cultural/creative industry, which were based on the result of the study in addition, we will also provide a few implication and suggestion of management for operators on organizational innovation of Taiwan’s cultural/creative industry.

Topic Category 商業管理學院 > 企業管理研究所
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 2004年台灣文化創意產業發展年報 ,行政院,94年
    連結:
  2. 2005年台灣文化創意產業發展年報 ,行政院,95年
    連結:
  3. 莊立民,組織創新模式建構與實證之研究—以台灣資訊電子業為例,成功大學企業管理學研究所博士論文。91年。
    連結:
  4. 陳志龍,"服務業組織創新擴散模式之研究"碩士論文,崑山科技大學企業管理研究所在職專班,94年
    連結:
  5. 滕人傑,"國內文化創意產業生態初探-以新興之音樂與表演藝術、視覺藝術及工藝產業為例"台灣經濟月刊,第二十七卷,第六期,p.90-100,93年。
    連結:
  6. Becker, S. W. and Whisler, T. L.(1967). “The innovative organization: A selective view of current theory and research.” , Journal of Business, 4, 462-469.
    連結:
  7. Betz, F. (1987), “Managing technology-competing through new ventures Innovation, and corporate research Prentice Hall.”
    連結:
  8. Daft, R. L. (1978). “A dual-core model of organization innovation.” , Academy of Management Journal, 21, 193-210.
    連結:
  9. Damanpour, F. and Evan ,W. M., (1984) “Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 392-409.
    連結:
  10. Damanpour, F.(1991). “Organizational innovation: a meta analysis of effects of determinants and moderators.” , Academy of Management Journal, 34(3),555-590.
    連結:
  11. Gibson, J.L. ,Ivancevich, J.M. & Donnelly, J.H.Jr. (1976). Organizations: behavior, structure, and processes, Dallas, Taxas: Business Publications, Inc.
    連結:
  12. Dougherty, D., & Bowman, E.H., (1995) “The effects of organizational downsizing of product innovation.”, California Management Review.37 (4), 28-44
    連結:
  13. Drazin, R.(1990), “Professionals and Innovation: Structural-Functional Versus Radical- Structural Perspectives.” , The Journal of Management Studies, 27(3),245-263.
    連結:
  14. Drucker, P.F., (1985), “Innovation and entrepreneurship Practice and principles.”, Heinemann, London, 1985.
    連結:
  15. Evan, W. M., and Black, G. (1967). “Innovation in business organization: Some factors associated with success or failure.”, Journal of Business, 40,519-530.
    連結:
  16. Frankle,E.G., (1990) “Management of technology change.” , Kluwer Academic.
    連結:
  17. Kanter, R. M. (1988). “When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior.”, 10,169-211.
    連結:
  18. Knight, K. E. (1967). “A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process.” , Journal of Business, 40, 478-496.
    連結:
  19. LeCompte, M. D., Prissle, J., & Tesch, R. (1993). “Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.).”, NY: Academic Press
    連結:
  20. Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). “Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research.”, Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275-289.
    連結:
  21. Lumpkin G.T. and G. G. Dess (1996), “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Constructs and Linking it to Performance,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21(1),pp. 135-172.
    連結:
  22. Marquis and Myers, “Successful Business Innovations,” National Sic. Foundation, Tech. Rep. NSF. , PP.69-70. (1972)
    連結:
  23. Rogers Everett M.,(2002). “Diffusion of preventive Innovations. Addictive Behaviors”, Vol. 27, 989-993.
    連結:
  24. Schumpeter,J. A.,(1934) “The theory of economic development.”, Boston, MA:Harvard.”
    連結:
  25. Shepard, H. A. (1967). “Innovation-resistion and Innovation-producing organizations.”, Journal of Business, 4, 470-477.
    連結:
  26. Souder, W. E. (1987), Managing New Product Innovations.
    連結:
  27. Thompson, J. D.(1967). “Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory.”, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    連結:
  28. Van de Ven, Andrew H., (1986) “Central problems in the management of innovation”, Management science, 32, 590-607.
    連結:
  29. Wolfe, R. A, (1994) “Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research direction.”, Journal of Management Studes, 31(3), 405-430
    連結:
  30. 財團法人國家文化藝術基金會,http://www.ncafroc.org.tw/index.asp
    連結:
  31. 吳思華,"文化創意的產業化思維,推動文化產業的契機與個案實踐國際論壇論文集",92年。
  32. 李國樑,"技術策略、技術創新能力與創新管理之關係研究-以台灣生物科技業為例",碩士論文,長榮管理學院經營管理研究所,89年。
  33. 杜長青,"台灣文化創意產業發展之探討-以工藝類為例",輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文,93年。
  34. 汪昭芬,"組織學習、知識創造、知識蘊蓄與創新績效之關聯性研究-科技製造業、一般製造業及服務業之實証",碩士論文,國立成功大學企業管理研究所",89年。
  35. 洪榮昭,創新變革的策略思維—領導者頭腦體操,台北:中國生產力中心,92年。
  36. 胡幼慧及姚美華,一些質性方法上的思考。載於胡幼慧主編:質性研究:理論、方法及本土性研究。台北:巨流,85年。
  37. 莊立民、廖曜生(2003),組織創新影響因素之研究—命題之建立與實證研究,人文、科技、e世代人力資源發展學術研討會,國立高雄應用科技大學人文社會學院主辦,92年。
  38. 莊立民、方詩緯(2004),台灣服務業組織創新歷程模式之研究,第三屆服務業行銷暨管理學術研討會,國立嘉義大學管理學院主辦,93年。
  39. 森穀正規,日本的技術,上海翻譯出版公司,p4,74年。
  40. 黃政傑,"質化研究的原理與方法",質的教育研究:方法與實例,台北:漢文,p1-46,87年。
  41. 黃瑞琴,質的研究方法,台北:心理,80年。
  42. 許士軍,「創新的研發組織」,能力雜誌,第510期,頁24-30,87年。
  43. 楊敏芝及辛晚教,"全球化經濟趨勢下臺灣文化產業發展策略研究,中華民國都市計劃學會一九九八年年會及學術研討會論文集:城響發展、文化與生活,p2-2-1~2-2-14,87年。
  44. 劉大和,"文化創意產業界定及其意義"台灣經濟研究月刊,第二十六巷,第五期,p115-122,92年。
  45. 蔡啟通,組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係,台灣大學商學研究所博士論文,86年。
  46. 蔡啟通、黃國隆、高泉豐,“組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係”,管理學報,第十八卷第四期,p527-p566,90年。
  47. 賴士葆,王秉鈞,黃佑安,"創造能力新產品研發過程關係之研究",科技管理研討會論文集,86年。
  48. 賴姿蓉,"二十一世紀變革的新趨勢-組織創新",人事月刊,第三十卷第一期,p26-p33,89年。
  49. 簡文娟(民88),「組織創新氣候評鑑量表之建立-以高科技產業為實證研究對象」,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,89年。
  50. Abernathy,W.J., and J.M. Utterback.(1978), “Patterns of innovation in technology.” , Technology Review,80(7),40-47.
  51. Afuah, A.(1998), “Innovation management:strategies, implementation, and profits.”, New York:Oxford University Press.
  52. Amabile, T. M.(1988), “A model of creativity and innovation in organization.” , Edited by Behavior, 10, 123-167.
  53. Amabile, T. M., Mary Ann Collins, Regina Conti Y Elise Phillips(1996), “Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity, Boulder, Colo.” , Westview Press.
  54. Chacke,G.K.(1988),Technology Management–Application to Coporate Markets and Military Missions, NY:Praeger.
  55. David Thorsby, “Economics and Culture”, Cambridge, 2001, p.112.
  56. Duncan, R. B. (1976), “The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. edited by R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, and D. P. Slevin.” , The Management of Organization: Strategy and Implementation, 1, 167-188. New York: North-Holland.
  57. Gattiker ,U.E., (1990) “Technology management in organization.”, Sage, CA.
  58. Guba, E. G. & Lin, Y. S. (1994). “Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.” , K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. CA: Sage.
  59. Holt, Kunt, (1988) ”Product innovation Management.”, London : Oxford , Butter worth Henemann , Harper Business.
  60. Kimberly, J. R. (1981). “Managerial innovation. Edited by P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck.”, Handbook of Organizational Design, 1, 84-104.
  61. Kurt Lewin〈1951〉,“Field Theory in Social Science”,N.Y.,Harper & Row.
  62. Majaro, S.(1988). “The Creative Gap: Managing Ideas for Profit.”, London: Longman.
  63. Nonaka, I. (1991). “The knowledge-creating company.”, Harvard Business Review, 96-104.
  64. Robbins, S. P., "Organization Theory:Structure, Design, and Application", San Diego:Prentice-Hall, 1996.
  65. Russell Johnston, Jr., Vector Mechanics for Engineers, Dynamics, Third edition, S. I. version, Mc Graw-Hill, 1998.
  66. Smith, J. K. (1990). “Alternative research paradigms and the problem of criteria.”, In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The Paradigm dialog. CA: Sage.
  67. Tidd, J.& Bessant, J.& Pavitt, K.(1997),Managing Innovation:Intergrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, England.
  68. Tushman, N. L. and Nadler, D. A., (1986) “Organizing for innovation.”, California Management Review, 28, 74-92
  69. Tushman,M.L., and L.Rosenkopf.(1992) “Organizational determinants of technological change: towards a sociology of technological evolution.”, Research in Organizational Behavior,14,311-347.
  70. Zaltman, G. Duncan, R. and Holbek, J. (1973). “Innovations and organizations.”, Wiley New York.
Times Cited
  1. 林宗奕(2007)。建構台灣文化創意產業組織創新衡量模式之研究---以創意生活產業為例。長榮大學經營管理研究所(博)學位論文。2007。1-179。