透過您的圖書館登入
IP:54.224.124.217
  • 學位論文

以AHP法探討農村社區景觀自主營造之成功因素

Using AHP on the Successful Factors Examine of Autonomous Autonomous Landscape Development in Rural Communities

指導教授 : 梁大慶
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


過去的農村社區因缺乏整體計畫地引導,導致農村發展與建設凌亂、新舊建築物雜陳;特別是在農村髒亂、破敗之窳陋空間,更是在環境景觀上的障礙。農村再生條例通過後,農村建設已有計畫性的引導,且政府也期望透過社區自主營造,促進周邊環境一併提升,擴大政策效果,以創造優質的農村景觀。農村社區發展首先必須建立有效的參與機制,促使社區居民之間的凝聚力,依據在地社區的地理條件,透過拋磚引玉的方式,如社區領袖主動執行營造計畫,喚起當地居民對於土地的熱忱,並且藉此發展社區在地特色,並應考量可行的資源籌措及運用,同時也能和周遭的民間組織、企業、學校共同發展,將由下而上的精神更加呼應。本研究透過文獻探討建立農村社區景觀自主營造之成功因素,共包含8項準則及28項次準則,以針對101年至103年度行政院農委會水土保持局舉辦全國農村社區窳陋空間的改善計畫之獲得優選社區以及專家學者作為問卷發放對象,以AHP層級分析法所求得結果得知以「人力投入」之重要性權重最高,代表社區自主營造改善工作時,有社區幹部領導引導、藝術家及達人共同參與其效果會有加成的效果。「人力投入」是為推動營造工作的基本條件,但在融入文化藝術內涵等方向仍需加強。建議未來透過農村美學概念及技術學習課程,並分享社區自辦自主營造改善工作經驗,以全面提農村整體美質。

並列摘要


To previous rural communities, the lack of integrated plans led to chaotic development and construction, and a random mixture of old and new buildings. In particular, dirty and crude space has been barrier to the landscape. Since the enactment of the Rural Rejuvenation Act, systematic guidance for rural development has been implemented. The government also expects the community autonomous development to promote the enhancement of surrounding environment, to enlarge the effect of policy, and to create quality rural landscape. The first priority to rural community development is to establish an effective participation mechanism, thus strengthening the cohesiveness among community residents and arousing local residents’ enthusiasm for the land based on the geographic conditions of the local community such as Community's Leader Initiative Development to cultivate local features of a community. Collection and application of available sources as well as joint development with surrounding civil society organizations, companies, and schools should also be taken into account, echoing the bottom-up spirit. The current study, through examination into previous literature, aimed to probe into successful factors of autonomous landscape development in rural communities, including eight principles and 28 subprinciples. Questionnaires were distributed to experts and the winning communities of Improvement Project of Rural Community Crude Space held by the Soil and Water Conservation Bureau during 2012 and 2014. The AHP analysis revealed that human input weighed the most, suggesting the benefits of joint participation from the community leader, artists, and experts during the improvement of community autonomous development. Human input is the prerequisite to the promotion of development. However, relevant fusion of culture and art should be strengthened. It is suggested that overall aesthetics of rural communities be enhanced via aesthetic concepts of rural communities, skill training courses, and experience sharing of improvement project of community autonomous development.

參考文獻


張惠真 (2012)。農村文化裝置藝術. 臺中區農情月刊, (160), 3-3.
漢寶德 (2004)。漢寶德談美。台北:聯經。
張淑君、張俊傑 (2010)。 農村產業經營方案之研究: 以南投縣鹿谷鄉茶產業為例. 農業推廣文彙, 147-156.
張宏政、林淑婷、陳儀甄 (2011)。 農村產業文化創新輔導策略之研究-發展稻米產銷專業區產業觀光為例. 休閒事業研究, 9(3), 59-83.
張淑君、劉怜均、劉純君 (2005)。農村地方文化產業分析與行銷經營策略. 農業經營管理年刊, (11), 1-34.

延伸閱讀