利用決策試驗與實驗評估法分析業主之專案組織結構與資源配置

Applying DEMATEL to analyze the project owner’s organizational structure and resource allocation

林岳樺(Yueh-Hua Lin)

指導教授 ： 王維志

國立交通大學/工學院/土木工程系所/碩士(2009年)

https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2009.00613

摘要

組織結構是組織管理研究中最常被探討的議題，因為組織結構的選擇不僅會影響到組織的績效表現，也會進一步影響組織的權責劃分，因此如何因應不同組織目標來選擇適合組織發展的結構一直被組織管理者所重視。
一般常見的組織結構類型分為以組織功能發展所設計出來的功能性組織及以特定專案為目的之專案組織；當兩種類型的組織共用同組織資源時會發生矩陣型組織，同一資源被兩單位指揮管理，進而造成指揮系統混亂、推責諉過之情事層出不窮；當專案規模大到須動用大部分功能組織資源時，此問題更加嚴重，因此本研究擬以一國家科學學術研究單位為案例，提出一個組織結構與資源配置模式來解決矩陣型組織之間資源指派與資源配置問題，進一步讓組織資源依照組織間指揮關聯強度來進行配置，盡量讓組織資源由指揮關聯系統來控制資源，以減少指揮系統的衝突。

關鍵字

組織結構 ； 資源配置 ； 人力資源 ； SIA(重要度滿意度分析) ； DEMATEL(決策試驗與實驗評估法)

並列摘要

Organizational Structure has been one of the most often discussed issues in the research of organizational management because the choice of organizational structure influences not only the organizational performance but also the allocation of powers. Therefore the organizational manager has paid much attention to the choice of suitable organizational structure form different organizational target.
The common types of organizational structure are functional organization that designed for organizational function and project organization that set up for specific project. When two of the organizational structures share the same organizational resource at the same while, there would be the matrix organization. And the resource would be commanded and controlled by two manage department then lead to the chaos of the command system. When the scale of the project has big enough to occupy most of the organizational resource, the problem has been much more serious. Therefore this research is planned to, with a national research center as an example, propose a series of methods to solve the problem of the resource allocation and assignment of matrix organization and reduce the conflict of the command system.

並列關鍵字

Organizational Structure ； Resource Allocation ； Human Resource ； SIA ； DEMATEL

參考文獻

22. 黃宗成、黃躍雯、余幸娟，2000，宗教觀光客旅遊動機、期望、滿意度關係之研究，戶外遊憩研究，13(3)，23-48。

14. 馬至宏，2005，「專案組織型態及特性與其績效之關連性」，國立成功大學，碩士論文。

5. Barbara A. A., Jaffe W. and Lin, L., 1994, “Purdue University, Use of the Service Attribute Matrix to Measure Consumer Satisfaction,” Hospitality Research Journal, 17（2）, 65-68.

11. Cleland D. I. and King W. R., Eds., 1983, The Cultural Ambience of the Matrix Organization, Project Management Handbook.

12. Cronbach, L.J., 1951, Coefficient Alpha and Internal Structure of Tests, Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.