Title

體感式合作學習系統之開發與應用成效分析-以高職英文學習為例

Translated Titles

The Development Application and Learning Performance Analysis of Collaborative Kinesthetic English Learning System in a Vocational High School

Authors

陳品澤

Key Words

全肢體反應教學法 ; 合作學習 ; 英文學習 ; 體感學習 ; Kinect ; Total Physical Response ; Collaborative learning ; English learning ; Kinesthetic Learning ; Kinect

PublicationName

中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2014年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

黃武元

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本研究主要目的以全肢體反應教學法(Total Physical Response, TPR)理論為基礎,結合體感辨識科技與合作學習活動,探討Collaborative Total Physical Response(CTPR)對高職生英文學習之影響。本研究採用Kinect科技並開發出Collaborative Kinesthetic English Learning (CKEL)系統,結合兩人一組合作學習活動的實驗設計,並從系統使用過程、前測、後測、問卷與訪談活動中收集資料加以分析。 從科技接受模型問卷與訪談分析中得知,參與者對實驗所採用的學習系統與學習活動都有不錯的認同程度。並藉由凱勒學習動機問卷與訪談的分析,實驗組參與者在學習上更有信心,有助於提昇學習者的學習動機。 後測總分與後測字彙測驗實驗組都顯著優於控制組,僅在後測句子測驗這項結果無達到顯著優於控制組(I),但實驗組平均分數比控制組(I)高。而本研究檢驗在應用TRP理論採用動作、姿勢學習不同詞類在學習成效上的分析結果,顯示動詞、名詞、形容詞的學習成效無顯著差異,所以若能將字彙發想出適合的關聯動作,皆可應用TPR的方式學習。 綜合分析結果,本研究所提出的學習方式讓參與者覺得有趣並更主動學習,促進了小組成員間的互動與合作學習。因此,這種CTPR比傳統個人TPR更適合英語學習,因為這樣的語言學習有互動與對話,讓參與者更有信心、更主動,進而達到更顯著的學習效果。

English Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to combine kinesthetic recognition technology and collaborative learning activities based on Total Physical Response (TPR) for investigating the effect of Collaborative Total Physical Response (CTPR) in English learning of vocational high school students. This study applies Kinect technology to develop a Collaborative Kinesthetic English Learning (CKEL) System which allow and two students to have collaborative learning activities in pairs. Besides, the experiment evaluation consists of using CKEL system record, pre-test, post-test, questionnaire and interview. The analysis of technology acceptance model questionnaires and interviews show that the almost participants accepted CKEL system and learning activities of the experiment. According to the analysis of Keller’s Learning Motivation ARCS Questionnaire and interviews, the participants of experimental group had more confidence in this learning activities and the experimental design could enable them to improve learning motivation. The learning outcomes of the experimental group was significantly better than the control groups in the post-test and the vocabulary part of posttest ,and the average mean of sentence part of posttest of the experimental group was higher than the control groups. In addition, the study analyzed the learning outcomes of using gestures, posture to learn different parts of speech based on TPR theory, and the results showed the verbs, nouns, adjectives learning were no significant difference. So, if the vocabulary can be combined with appropriate related action, it can be applied TPR theory to learn. Finally, this learning style can enhance learning attention of participants, also give more active learning, promoting interaction and collaboration among members of the group. Therefore, CTPR is more suitable English language learning than the traditional personal TPR, this is due to the including of interaction and dialogue can enhance participants to have more confident and active.

Topic Category 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
資訊電機學院 > 網路學習科技研究所
社會科學 > 教育學
Reference
  1. Asher, J. J. (1966). The learning strategy of the total physical response: A review: ERIC Clearinghouse.
    連結:
  2. Asher, J. J. (1968). The total physical response method for second language learning: DTIC Document.
    連結:
  3. Asher, J. J. (1969). The Total Physical Response Approach to Second Language Learning*. The Modern Language Journal, 53(1), 3-17.
    連結:
  4. Blakemore, S.-J., & Frith, U. (2005). The learning brain: Lessons for education: Blackwell publishing.
    連結:
  5. Carels, P. E. (1981). Pantomime in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 14(5), 407-411.
    連結:
  6. Chang, C. Y., Chien, Y. T., Chiang, C. Y., Lin, M. C., & Lai, H. C. (2013). Embodying gesture‐based multimedia to improve learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E5-E9.
    連結:
  7. Chang, Y. J., Chen, S. F., & Huang, J. D. (2011). A Kinect-based system for physical rehabilitation: A pilot study for young adults with motor disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2566-2570. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.002
    連結:
  8. Chang, Y. J., Chou, L. D., Wang, F. T. Y., & Chen, S. F. (2013). A kinect-based vocational task prompting system for individuals with cognitive impairments. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(2), 351-358. doi: 10.1007/s00779-011-0498-6
    連結:
  9. Chao, K. J., Huang, H. W., Fang, W. C., & Chen, N. S. (2013). Embodied play to learn: Exploring Kinect-facilitated memory performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), E151-E155. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12018
    連結:
  10. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 33456.
    連結:
  11. Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4-10.
    連結:
  12. Guilherme, M. (2007). English as a global language and education for cosmopolitan citizenship. Language and Intercultural Communication, 7(1), 72-90.
    連結:
  13. Jorczak, R. L. (2011). An information processing perspective on divergence and convergence in collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 207-221. doi: 10.1007/s11412-010-9104-6
    連結:
  14. Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
    連結:
  15. Kelly, S. D., McDevitt, T., & Esch, M. (2009). Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 313-334.
    連結:
  16. Kuhl, P. K. (2010). Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron, 67(5), 713-727.
    連結:
  17. Kuo, F.-R., Hsu, C.-C., Fang, W.-C., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). The effects of Embodiment-based TPR approach on student English vocabulary learning achievement, retention and acceptance. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1, Supplement), 63-70. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.003
    連結:
  18. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching: Oxford university press.
    連結:
  19. Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2005). From movement to metaphor with manner-of-movement verbs. Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 241-261. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami002
    連結:
  20. Liu, T.-Y., & Chu, Y.-L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643.
    連結:
  21. Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K. (2012). Gestures Enhance Foreign Language Learning. BIOLINGUISTICS, 6(3-4), 393-416.
    連結:
  22. Nijhof, W., & Kommers, P. (1985). An analysis of cooperation in relation to cognitive controversy. Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn, 125-145.
    連結:
  23. Nikolaidou, G. N. (2012). ComPLuS model: A new insight in pupils’ collaborative talk, actions and balance during a computer-mediated music task. Computers & Education, 58(2), 740-765. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.027
    連結:
  24. Pontual Falcão, T., & Price, S. (2010). Interfering and resolving: How tabletop interaction facilitates co-construction of argumentative knowledge. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 539-559. doi: 10.1007/s11412-010-9101-9
    連結:
  25. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences.
    連結:
  26. Tellier, M. (2008). The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children. Gesture, 8(2), 219-235.
    連結:
  27. Tomasello, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition: Harvard University Press.
    連結:
  28. Vygotskiĭ, L. L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes: Harvard university press.
    連結:
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    連結:
  30. Wolfe, D. E., & Jones, G. (1982). Integrating total physical response strategy in a level I Spanish class. Foreign Language Annals, 15(4), 273-280.
    連結:
  31. Yeo, T. M., & Quek, C. L. (2011). Investigating design and technology students' peer interactions in a technology-mediated learning environment: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 751-764.
    連結:
  32. Alexiadis, D. S., Kelly, P., Daras, P., O'Connor, N. E., Boubekeur, T., & Moussa, M. B. (2011). Evaluating a dancer's performance using kinect-based skeleton tracking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia.
  33. Cantoni, G. P. (1999). Using TPR-Storytelling To Develop Fluency and Literacy in Native American Languages. 53.
  34. Carruthers, S. W. (2010). The Total Physical Response Method and Its Compatibility with Adult ESL Learners.
  35. Chang, C. Y., Lange, B., Zhang, M., Koenig, S., Requejo, P., Somboon, N., . . . Rizzo, A. A. (2012). Towards pervasive physical rehabilitation using Microsoft Kinect. Paper presented at the Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2012 6th International Conference on.
  36. Davis Jr, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  37. Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 27-50.
  38. Garcia, R., Asher, J. J., & Asher, J. (1988). Instructor's Notebook: How to Apply TPR for Best Results: Sky Oaks.
  39. Kashiwagi, H., Xue, Y., Sun, Y., Kang, M., & Ohtsuki, K. (2009). A Language Learning System Utilizing RFID Technology for Total Physical Response Activities. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains (Vol. 5613, pp. 119-128): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  40. Lange, B., Koenig, S., McConnell, E., Chang, C., Juang, R., Suma, E., . . . Rizzo, A. (2012). Interactive game-based rehabilitation using the Microsoft Kinect. Paper presented at the Virtual Reality Workshops (VR), 2012 IEEE.
  41. Liang, M. Y. (2010). USING SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE PEER RESPONSE GROUPS IN EFL WRITING: REVISION-RELATED DISCOURSE. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 45-64.
  42. Nguyen, K., Stanley, N., & Stanley, L. (2014). Storytelling in Teaching Chinese as a Second/Foreign Language.
  43. Pishkar, K., & Ketabi, S. (2013). Effects of teaching of Modern American Drama As a Method for Speaking Fluency in BA EFL students. American Open Modern Language Journal, 1(1).
  44. Reinders, H. (2014). TOUCH AND GESTURE-BASED LANGUAGE LEARNING SOME POSSIBLE AVENUES FOR RESEARCH AND CLASSROOM PRACTICE. Teaching English with Technology(1), 3-8.
  45. Su, M.-C., & Lin, H.-Y. (2013). A Simple Approach to a Human Action Recognition System and Its Application in an Interactive TPR-based English Learning System. Journal of Advanced Technology and Management, 3(2), 15-27.
  46. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 97, 114.
  47. Wortzel, R. (1979). Multivariate analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Zack, M.(1999),” Developing a Knowledge Strategy.” California Management Review, 41(3), 125-143.
  48. Zimmer, H. D. (2001). Why do actions speak louder than words? Action memory as a variant of encoding manipulations or the result of a specific memory system. Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory, 151-198.
  49. 周克謙. (2013). 體感科技支持全肢體反應教學法應用於高中英語教學之成效. (碩士論文).
  50. 游婷雅. (2007). 樂在學習的腦-神經科學可以解答的教育問題 (2007/05/16 ed.). 台北市: 遠流出版公司.