Title

員工企業社會責任感知與企業社會責任活動參與之關聯-以歸因為干擾變數

Translated Titles

The Relationship between Employees’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility Activities: The Moderating Role of Employee Attribution

Authors

蔡銀玲

Key Words

企業社會責任 ; 員工企業社會責任感知 ; 內外在歸因 ; 企業責任活動參與 ; CSR ; Employees’ Perceptions of CSR ; Attribution of CSR ; participation in CSR activities

PublicationName

中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2015年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

劉念琪

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

企業社會責任(Corporate social responsible,簡稱CSR)的理論與實務發展,已成為近年來企業永續經營的一門學問。本研究認為,身為組織內部觀察人的員工,較其他利害關係人更接近核心,因此,建立以員工觀點的研究模型,了解員工企業社會責任感知對企業社會責任活動參與的影響過程及結果。包含探討員工企業社會責任感知與參與企業社會責任活動有正向影響。調查員工對企業社會責任歸因能夠影響員工企業社會責任活動參與。也探討員工企業社會責任感知與企業社會責任活動參與是否受企業社會責任歸因所干擾。 研究樣本來源為2013年公開資訊站中上市櫃公司為調查對象,以便利抽樣的方式取得34家上市上櫃公司,選出約20位員工填寫紙本問卷。研究調查之樣本公司總共有34家公司、614份有效問卷,有效回收率為90.3%,本研究分析結果得知: 1、員工企業社會責任感知與企業社會責任活動參與有正向關聯。 2、員工對組織的企業社會責任內在歸因與企業社會責任活動參與有正向關聯。 3、員工對組織的企業社會責任內在歸因對企業社會責任感知與企業社會責任活動參與具有顯著干擾效果。

English Abstract

Theories and practices about corporate social responsibility (CSR) have already become one of the key factors of corporate sustainability. Because employees are stakeholders and are closer to the core operation of CSR, we can better build a model based on employees’ perspective to examine the relationship between employees’ perception of CSR and employees’ participation in CSR related activities. Hence, this study has three purposes: examining if a positive relationship exists between employees’ perception of CSR and employees’ participation in CSR activities; investigating the linkages between employee attributions of CSR and employees’ participation in CSR activities; exploring employee attributions of CSR moderate the relationship between employees’ perception of CSR and employees’ participation of CSR activities. Data was collected by convenience sampling from companies listed on OTC recorded in 2013. Around 20 questionnaires were distributed to 34 companies each, and 614 valid questionnaires were retrieved with a response rate of 90.3%. After the analysis, the findings of my study are as following: 1. Employees’ Perception of CSR is positively related to employees’ participation in CSR activities. 2. Employee Internal Attribution of CSR is positively related to employees’ participation in CSR activities. 3. Employee Internal Attribution of CSR moderates the linkage between employees’ perception of CSR and employees’ participation of CSR activities.

Topic Category 管理學院 > 人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 2.石雅智(2011),員工對企業公益活動之參與意願研究,國立中央大學人力資源
    連結:
  2. 4.呂秋育(2013),企業社會責任實施現狀認知、員工工作滿意度與離職傾向關係
    連結:
  3. 7.邱雯婷(2014),企業社會責任實施程度與員工組織承諾之關聯-以員工企業社會責任知覺為中介變數,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  4. 9.黃營杉、齊德彰(2005),企業倫理、社會責任與慈善公益作為之研究-以台灣
    連結:
  5. 10.曾皎瑾(2012),企業社會責任對組織正向環境知覺與組織支持知覺之影響:性
    連結:
  6. 12.張妤禎(2012),企業社會責任認知及企業志工參與對組織公民行為之影響,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  7. 1.Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2013). Embedded versus Peripheral Corporate Social Responsibility: Psychological Foundation. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6 (2013), 314–332.
    連結:
  8. 2.Anne-Laure, Gatignon-Turnau , Karim Mignonac (2014). (Mis)Using employee volunteering for public relations: Implications for corporate volunteers' organizational commitment. Journal of Business Research ,68,7-18.
    連結:
  9. 3.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Concepual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    連結:
  10. 4.Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32(0), 63-86.
    連結:
  11. 5.Berman S.L., Wicks A. C., Kotha S. and Jones T.M., (1999).Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal,42(5),488-506.
    連結:
  12. 8.Bowen, H.R.(1953). Social responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Row.
    連結:
  13. 9.Branco, M. C. and Rodrigues, L. L. (2006), Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives, Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111-132.
    連結:
  14. 10.Brockner, J., & Siegel, P. (1996). Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: the role of trust. In R.M. Kramer (Ed.). Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research, 390-413.
    連結:
  15. 11.Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
    連結:
  16. 12.Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34,39-48.
    連結:
  17. 13.Chong, M. (2009) Employee Participation in CSR and Corporate Identity:Insights from a Disaster-response Program in the Asia-pacific, The Reputation Review,12(12),106-119.
    連結:
  18. 14.Cohen, D. V( 1995). Moral Climate in Business Firms: A Framework for Empirical Research [C]. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 386-390.
    連結:
  19. 15.Collier, j., & Esteban, R.(2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 19-33.
    連結:
  20. 16.Du, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corpora te social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224-241.
    連結:
  21. 17.Eisenberger, R,, Cummings, J., Armeli, & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 812-820.
    連結:
  22. 18.Ellen, Pamela Scholder, Deborah J. Webb and Lois A. Mohr (2006). Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 147-157.
    連結:
  23. 20.Gavin, J. F. and Maynard, W.S. (1975). Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility. Personnel Psychology, 28, 377–387.
    連結:
  24. 21.Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21-38.
    連結:
  25. 22.Groza, Mark D., Mya Pronschinske, and Matthew Walker (2011), “Perceived Organizational Motives and Consumer Responses to Proactive and Reactive CSR.” Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 639-652.
    連結:
  26. 23.Hastak, M., & Olson., J.C.(1989). Assessing the role of brand-related cognitive responses as mediators of communication effects on cognitive structure. Journal of Coonsumer Research, 50(1), 444-456.
    連結:
  27. 24.Heider, F.(1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 322.
    連結:
  28. 25.Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. E.(2004). Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in china: investigating generalizability &instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology,89(2), 311-321.
    連結:
  29. 26.Jones, D.A. (2010). Does Serving the Community Also Serve the Company? Using Organizational Identification and Social Exchange Theories to Understand Employee Responses to a Volunteerism Programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 857-878.
    連結:
  30. 27.Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology ,II , 219-266 . New York: Academic Press.
    連結:
  31. 28.Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
    連結:
  32. 29.Kelley H. H, Michela, J.L (1980). Attribution Theory and Research. Annual review of psychology, 31, 457-501.
    連結:
  33. 30.Kim, H.-R., Lee, M., Lee, H.-T., and Kim, N.-M(2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee-company identification. Journal of Business Ethics,
    連結:
  34. 31.Lin, L.W. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility in China: Window Dressing or Structural Change. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 28, 64–100.
    連結:
  35. 32.Mael, F., & Ashforth, B.E. (1992). Journal of Organizational Behavior,13(2), 103-124
    連結:
  36. 34.Mark S. Schwartz, Archie B. Carroll(2013). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, (13): 503-530.
    連結:
  37. 35.Maslow,A. H(1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50,370-396.
    連結:
  38. 36.Martinko, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Harvey, P.(2006). Attribution theory in industrial and organizational psychology: A review. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 21,127–187.
    連結:
  39. 37.Mael, F., & Ashforth, B.E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
    連結:
  40. 38.Mohr, Lois A. and Deborah J. Webb (2005). The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Price on Consumer Responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39, (1), 121-147.
    連結:
  41. 39.Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R.(2006). Strategy and society: the link between corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage. Harvard business review, 84 (12) , 78-92.
    連結:
  42. 40.Shapiro, C. (1983), Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. The quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4), 661-679.
    連結:
  43. 41.Robertson T.S., & h. Gatihnon (1986). Copetitive effects on technology diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 1-12.
    連結:
  44. 43.UNIDO. (2002). Corporate Social Responsibility - Implications for Small and Medium Enterprises in Developing Countries Vienna.
    連結:
  45. 44.VanSandt, C. V., M. S. Jon, et al.(2006). An Examination of the Relationship between Ethical Work Climate and Moral Awareness. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(4), 409-432.
    連結:
  46. 45.Vlachos Pavlos A, Tsamakos, Argiris, Vrechopoulos, Adam, Avramidis, Panagiotis (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility: Attributions, Loyalty, and the Mediating Role of Trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 170-180.
    連結:
  47. 46.Vlachos, P. A., Theotokis, A., & Panagopoulos, N. G. (2010), Sales force reactions to corporate social responsibility: Attributions, outcomes, and
    連結:
  48. 47.Vlachos, P., Epitropaki, O., Panagopoulos, N. & Rapp, A. (2013). Causal Attributions and Employee Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6 (4), 334-337.
    連結:
  49. 49.Zairi, M., and Peters, J. (2002). The Impact of Social Responsibility on Business Performance. Academy of Management Journal,17(4),174-178.
    連結:
  50. 中文部分
  51. 1.Michael E. Porter、Mark R. Kramer (2006),企業慈善的競爭優勢,哈佛商業評論中文版,第16期,頁71-85。
  52. 管理研究所碩士論文。
  53. 3.朱瑞欣(2013),員工參與企業社會責任對組織認同影響之研究-以主管支持為調節變數。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
  54. 之探討─以A 公司為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
  55. 5.林宜諄、高希均(2008) ,企業社會責任入門手冊(Corporate Social Responsibility Handbook),頁261。
  56. 6.林振裕(1999),勞工參與制度與勞資關係,勞工之友雜誌,第577期,頁14。
  57. 8.高子涵(2012),企業對企業社會責任的投入程度對員工組織認同、組織公民行
  58. 為的影響,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
  59. 高科技電子產業為例,國立台北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
  60. 別、職位與負向情緒的調節作用,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
  61. 11.陳嫣如(1993),從企業公益贊助探討社會福利機構可行的勸募策略,東吳大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
  62. 13.詹前儀(2008),企業參與公益活動對消費者購買意願之研究-以運動鞋品牌為例,逢甲大學合作經濟學系研究所碩士論文
  63. 14.潘玉汝(2012),探討員工企業社會責任之認知對組織公民行為之影響-以組織承諾為中介變項,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
  64. 15.劉念琪、江欣諭、吳奇聯、黃鈺婷(2011),探討企業與員工的社會參與,第十七屆人力資源管理實務與研究成果發表會。
  65. 16.賴美貞(2004),美.日.德及我國團體協商制度與勞工參與制度關係之比較,勞工研究季刊,第113期,頁48。
  66. 英文部分
  67. 6.Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D(2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Solan Management Review, 49(2),36-44
  68. 7.Boccalandro B.(2009). Mapping success in employee volunteering: The drivers for effectiveness in employee volunteering and giving programs and Fortune 500. Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship.
  69. 19.Frederick, W. C. (1987). Theories of corporate social performance. In S. P. Sethi and C. Falbe (eds.) Business and Society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation. New York: Lexington Books,142-161.
  70. 95(4), 557–569.
  71. 33.Maignan, I. & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Measuring Corporate Citizenship in Two Countries: The Case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 283-297.
  72. 42.Robbins, S. P. (2005). Organizational behavior, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  73. the mediating role of organizational trust. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 1207-1218.
  74. 48.Weiner,B. (1972). Theories of Motivation : From Mechanism to Cognition, Chicago : Markham.