技藝競賽關鍵成功因素之探討

Exploring Critical Success Factors for skills competition

陳寶雲(Pao-Yun Chen)

指導教授 ： 莊世杰

國立中正大學/管理學院/企業管理學系/碩士(2012年)

摘要

全國高級中等學校學生技藝競賽，可彰顯各校技能教學成效，使得各校莫不傾力參賽，多方相互配合才能使得職業學校的技能學習辦理成效良好，本研究深感培訓競賽選手的參考資料非常重要，對於技藝教育能在教育體系發揮極大功能，加強各類科專業知識及技能之學習，以理論緊密配合實務，協助學生技藝競賽的獲獎，有助於競賽選手將來的就業或升學，成為技職界的菁英，為自己的努力得到最高的回饋，為校爭取最高的無限榮耀。
本研究針對技藝競賽關鍵成功因素之探討，利用分析層級程序法(AHP)探討其關鍵成功因素。研究發現技藝競賽關鍵成功整體之關鍵成功因素依序為：在整體17項重要因素上以「家庭與經濟資源的支持」，最重要，依序為「解決問題能力」，「個人潛力發展的能力」，「教師專業能力」，「經費成本管理」，「培訓計畫與訓練模式」，「學生個人特質」，「自我挑戰與自我管理能力」，「技術創新」，「學校與企業聯盟策略」，「學習態度與堅毅精神」，「教師工作態度」，「訓練場地規模」，「組織管理政策」，「具有優勢資源」，「機具設備完善」，「溝通協調與檢討」。
並歸納出技藝競賽關鍵成功因素的結論：一、以三項主要構面【策略聯盟運作】、【學校技藝資源】、【學生成就表現】，在主要績效構面三個重要指標中，我們發現【學生成就表現】最重要；二、次要構面層對於(一)對於【策略聯盟運作】之績效目標, 其相對權重分析以「技術創新能力」最為顯著。(二)對於【學校技藝資源】之績效目標, 其相對權重分析以「教師專業能力」最為顯著。(三)對於【學生成就表現】之績效目標, 其相對權重分析以「家庭與經濟資源的支持」權值最為顯著。

關鍵字: 技藝競賽、關鍵成功因素、 策略聯盟 、成就表現、分析層級程序法

關鍵字

技藝競賽 ； 關鍵成功因素 ； 策略聯盟 ； 成就表現 ； 分析層級程序法

並列摘要

Senior high school students' skill contest can highlight the effectiveness of skill-teaching at school .All the school spare all the effort for the contest. Only with the co-working with all the authorities concerned can skill-learning at vocational high schools end up efficiently. We deeply believe that the reference data of the training for competition players is very important and helps a lot with the effectiveness of craft education in the education system. The reference data also strengthen the professional knowledge and skills of all kinds of subjects with the learning theory working closely with practices to hekp students win the contest . That will contribute to future employment or further study of competition players, becoming the technical and vocational elites. Finally, they got the most feedback for their efforts and strived for the highest prestige for the school.
As for the critical success factors of skill competitions in this study, we use the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to explore the critical success factors. The study showed that the overall key factors to the critical successful skill competition are in the sequence: The most in the overall 17 factors is “family background environment”, followed by “problem-solving skills”, “the ability of the individual potential to develop”, “teachers' professional capacity”, “the funding-and-expense management, training plans and modes”, “the students' personal qualities”, “self-challenging and self-management skills”, “technology innovation”, “strategic alliances of schools and enterprises”, “attitude and perseverance”, “teachers' attitude”, “size of the training place”, “the organization management policy”, “the advantages of resources”, “ perfect machinery and equipment”, and “communication, coordination and review”.
Conclude the critical success factors of the skill competition: Firstly, based on the three main dimensions: “operation of strategic alliances”, “skill resources at the schools”, “students’ achievement”. Among these three important indicators, also the three main dimensions, we found that “students’ achievement” is the most important; secondly, the secondary dimension layers work the most significantly on these three:
(A) the relative weight analysis of “the technological innovation capability” with the performance objectives on “operation of strategic alliances”.
(B) the relative weight analysis of “teachers' professional capacity” with the performance objectives on “skill resources at the schools”.
(C) the relative weight analysis of “family background environment” with the performance objectives on “students’ achievement”.
Keywords: craft competition, key success factors, strategic alliances,achievement, Analytic Hierarchy Process

並列關鍵字

craft competition ； key success factors ； strategic alliances ； achievement ； Analytic Hierarchy Process

參考文獻

蔡惠如(2010)教師領導與自我決定對全國農業類科技藝競賽選手學習後設認知的影響，屏東科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。

李靜沂(2010)全國商業類科技藝競賽選手訓練接受度調查－以烘焙、中餐烹飪與餐飲服務職種為例，屏東科技大學，技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。

葉靜蓉(2011)一個結合TOPSIS與AHP的網路服務信任評估機制，國立交通大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文彰化師範大學。http://ir.ncue.edu.tw/ir/handle/987654321/3895

曾鈞麟(2006)大學生憂鬱傾向與計畫能力關係之探討。高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。

林琴珠、吳榕峰(2002)，全國職業學校學生技藝競賽實施之探討，技術及職業教育雙月刊，第69期，56 。