透過您的圖書館登入
IP:44.192.73.68
  • 學位論文

以社會融合觀點重新省思我國刑事政策

Introspection Of The Criminal Policies In Taiwan Through The Perspective On Social Inclusion

指導教授 : 王正嘉
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


風險社會帶給大眾不安全感,更影響了刑事政策的發展,媒體渲染並誇大我國的治安狀況,導致人民誤信犯罪惡化,並加深對於犯罪被害的恐懼,不僅開始質疑犯罪人矯治教化的成效,亦開始依賴刑罰、迷信刑罰的機能,造成嚴罰化與民粹式刑事政策的產生。過度依賴刑罰的結果導致監獄收容人口迅速成長,帶給國家財政負擔之外,社會對於受刑人的錯誤印象亦使得受刑人面臨嚴重的社會排除問題。 社會排除的起源雖然與刑事司法無涉,但觀察我國受刑人口可以發現,多數受刑人入監之前因為失業、教育程度或經濟狀況不佳,亦即受刑人來自社會排除的環境,出獄後更因為服刑期間與社會長期脫離,舊有的社會網絡已經崩壞,受刑人必須面對更加惡化的社會排除問題。既有文獻缺乏社會融合的明確定義,若僅從「反社會排除」的方式理解其內涵,則政策制定上恐有闕漏,因此本文先釐清社會融合之概念後,以利嘗試從社會融合的角度反思我國現有的刑事政策。 刑罰之目的並非企圖在將受刑人徹底排除於社會之外,但現行的刑事司法制度卻反而將犯罪人推向更嚴重的社會排除結果,故本文以為從社會融合的角度思考,我國刑事政策未來應朝向減少刑罰,擴大社區處遇的運用,並嘗試納入並應用問題解決型法庭、修復式司法等制度,針對現行更生保護制度、社會勞動制度的問題亦應加以調整改善,並發展國家與民間團體之間的合作關係,以期待能夠建構完整的制度,使受刑人重新整合回到社會。

並列摘要


With the coming of Risk Society, people feel more unsafe and criminal policies are also influenced. Populations in Taiwan are misguided by mass media which exaggerating the condition of public order and people misunderstand that crime rate is getting higher. They feel much more afraid of being victimized; querying the effects of traditional treatments to prisoners, and depend on criminal punishment. It results in penal populism. The increasing incarceration rate which results from excessively depending on penalties causes Taiwan more financial burdens. We can indicate by data that Prisoners in Taiwan who are unemployed or not well-educated before imprisonment have to face more severe condition of social exclusion after leaving prison because of their own social networks which are disintegrated by the long-term imprisonment. We still cannot clearly define what so-called social inclusion is from existing documents. It may narrow our viewpoint if we interpret social inclusion as “anti-social exclusion”. The study tries to clarify the concept of social inclusion so as to reconsider criminal policies in Taiwan. The criminal justice system in Taiwan reinforces social exclusion of prisoners though the exclusion is not the main purpose of penalty theories. The study suggests that attempting to review criminal policies through the concept of social inclusion; we have to put more community-based treatments into practices and decrease the punishments, trying to develop problem-solving courts and restorative justice and improving the existing after-care system and social service order. More importantly, governments should cooperate with NGOs or NPOs to establish a better system to reintegrate prisoners.

參考文獻


08.周桂田,從「全球化風險」到「全球在地化風險」之研究進路:對貝克理論的批判思考,台灣社會學刊第31期,2003年12月,頁153-188。
26.蘇俊雄,自由刑理論與刑法改革的比較研究,臺大法學論叢第23卷第1期,1993年12月,頁99-114。
15.許華孚,社會形塑少年暴力犯為危險他者之運作機制:「代罪羔羊」形象的社會建構,犯罪與刑事司法研究第12期,2009年3月,頁144-207。
14.許華孚,監獄與社會排除:一個批判性的分析,犯罪與刑事司法研究第5期,2005年9月,頁191-235。
13.許華孚,傅科(Michel Foucault)對於當代犯罪控制的啟發,犯罪與刑事司法研究第3期,2004年9月,頁105-150。

被引用紀錄


高心怡(2013)。易服社會勞動人社會復歸之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2208201315392100

延伸閱讀