Title

環境意識與環境權利之初探

Translated Titles

An Exploratory Study On Environmental Consciousness And Environmental Right.

Authors

吳泓儒

Key Words

公民權利 ; 環境運動 ; 環境參與 ; 環境權 ; 環境意識 ; Environmental Participation ; Environmental Right ; Environmental Consciousness ; Environmental Movement ; Civil Rights

PublicationName

中正大學政治學系學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2015年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

魏楚陽

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

近年來在許多先進國家中,環境意識與環境議題日益受到重視。隨之而來的,便是公民的環境權,逐漸成為許多國家公民所主張之基本公民權的一部份。因此諸多西方國家的公民,相繼於二十世紀七零年代以降,參與環境運動以求捍衛自己的健康環境權。以政治學的核心概念,也就是權利保障的角度觀之,公民的環境意識在這些爭取公民環境權落實的環境運動中,扮演了相當關鍵的角色。   因此本論文主要聚焦在環境意識與環境權利的涵義與發展。透過整理環境意識的研究方法、環境主義的理論討論,以及環境權利的發展等理論知識。釐清公民的環境意識,與環境權利發展的因果關係。最後於結論階段,以道德、方法論與政治上公民權利運作三種層面,闡述本論文的研究成果。

English Abstract

Nowadays developed countries have strongly concern about the environmental issues. According to this trend more and more citizen have the purpose of the environmental right, which considered to be part of the fundamental right. Because of this reason, many westerners or developed countries citizen participate environmental movement to struggle their health environmental right since 1970s.On the other hand, according to the basic sense of political science, I found that the environmental consciousness play a crucial role in this environmental revolution. This study focus on the meaning of environmental consciousness and environmental right. I generalize three elements such as “collecting theories about how to research environmental consciousness”, “the trend of environmentalism”, and “the theory about environmental right” to fulfill the content. And figure out the relationship between environmental consciousness and environmental right. Lastly, this study will separate three orientations such as“ moral”,” theories”, and”citizen right” to explain my research results and come up with some useful suggestions.

Topic Category 社會科學院 > 政治學系
社會科學 > 政治學
Reference
  1. 王毓正(2010)。從奧爾胡斯公約檢視我國環境影響評估法制中民眾參與之規範。公共行政學報,第35期,頁61-117。
    連結:
  2. 杜文苓(2010)。環評決策中公民參與的省思:以中科三期開發爭議為例。公共行政學報,第35期,頁29-60。
    連結:
  3. 黃文雄、黃芳銘、游森期、田育芬、吳忠宏(2009)。環境典範量表之驗證與應用。環境教育,第6卷第2期,頁49-76。
    連結:
  4. 湯京平,邱崇原(2010)。專業與民主:台灣環境影響評估的運作與調適。公共行政學報,第35期,頁1-28。
    連結:
  5. 戴興盛、康文尚、郭靜雯(2013)。台灣環評制度與執行設計:反思美麗灣案。國家發展研究,第十二卷,頁133-178。
    連結:
  6. Blowers, A. (1993). Environmental policy: the quest for sustainable development. Urban Stud. 30, 775-796.
    連結:
  7. Boyd, D. R. (2012). The Environmental rights revolution: A Global study of Constitutions, Human Rights, and the Environment. Toronto: UBC Press
    連結:
  8. Branum, K.A. & Cepeda, L.A. & Howsmon, C. & Zhuplev, A. (2013). Drivers, Trends, and Outlook in Sustainable Development: Comparing Best Practices in Northern Europe (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden and California.) In Leonard, L (Ed.), Principles and Strategies to Balance Ethical, Social and Environmental Concerns with Corporate Requirements (pp.119-160).published online from: ISBN-13: 978-1781906279
    連結:
  9. Cotgrove, S. (1976). Environmentalism and utopia. Sociological Review, 24, 23-42.
    連結:
  10. Cotgrove, S. (1982). Catastrophe or cornucopia: The environment, politics, and the future. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    連結:
  11. Dagger, R. (1989). ”Right,” in Ball, T. & Farr, J. & Hanson, R.L. (Eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    連結:
  12. Dobson, A. (1995). Green Political Thought. London: Routledge
    連結:
  13. Ehrlich, P.R. (2002). Human Natures, Nature Conservation, and Environmental Ethics. BioScience Vol. 52 No. 1, 31-43
    連結:
  14. Fox, W. (1995). Toward a Transpersonal Ecology: Developing New Foundations for Environmentalism. New York: State University of New York Press.
    連結:
  15. Gooch, G. D. (1995). Environmental Beliefs and Attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic States. Environment and Behavior Vol.27 No.4, 513-539
    連結:
  16. Harding, A. (2007). Access to environmental Justice: A comparative Study. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
    連結:
  17. Hiskes, R.P. (2009). The Human Right to a Green Future: Environmental Rights and intergenerational justice. Cambridge University Press.
    連結:
  18. Routledge.
    連結:
  19. Jamison, A. & Eyerman, R. & Cramer, J. & LÆssØe, J. (1990). The Making of the New Environmental Consciousness: A Comparative Study of the Environmental Movements in Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands. George Square: The University of Edinburgh.
    連結:
  20. Jamison, A. & Erik, B. (1999).National Shades of Green: Comparing the Danish and Swedish Styles in Ecological Modernisation, Environmental Values, Vol.8, No.2, 199-218.
    連結:
  21. Jehlicka, P. & Sarre, P. & Podoba, J. (2005).The Czech Environmental Movement’s knowledge interests in the 1990s: compatibility of Western influences with pre-1989 perspectives. Environmental Politics, Vol.14, No.1, 64-82.
    連結:
  22. Kilbournea, W.E. & Beckmannb, S.C. & Thelenc, E. (2002). The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: A multinational examination. Journal of Business Research 55, 193-204.
    連結:
  23. Kneese, A.V. (1979). Development and Environment. Third World Quarterly, Vol.1, No.1, 84-90.
    連結:
  24. Kuzmiak, D.T. (1991). The American Environmental Movement. The Geographical Journal, Vol.157, No.3, 265-278.
    連結:
  25. Lewis, J. (1985). The Birth of EPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved September 27, 2013 from http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/birth-epa.
    連結:
  26. Lundin, L.C. (2000). River Basin Management. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
    連結:
  27. Mann, M. (1987). Ruling Class Strategies and Citizenship. Sociology. vol.21 no.3, 339-354.
    連結:
  28. Marshall, T. H. (1950).Citizenship And Social Class. London: Cambridge at the University Press.
    連結:
  29. Milbrath, W.L.(1984).Environmentalists Vanguard For a New Society. New York: State University of New York Press.
    連結:
  30. Milton, K.(1996). Environmentalism and Cultural Theory: Exploring the Role of Anthropology in Environmental Discourse. New York: Routledge.
    連結:
  31. Muir, J. (1903). Sargent’s Silva, The Atlantic Monthly 92, 147.
    連結:
  32. Nash, R.F. (1989). The Right Of Nature: A History of environmental ethics. London: The University of Wisconsin Press
    連結:
  33. Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary, Inquiry, Vol.16 No.1, 95-100.
    連結:
  34. Norton, B.G. (1991). Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.
    連結:
  35. Passmore, J.A. (1974). Man's Responsibility for Nature: Ecological Problems and Western Tradition. Portland: Green Earth Books.
    連結:
  36. Peterson, A. (1989). Review: Social Movement Theory. Acta Sociologica, Vol.32, No.4: 419-426
    連結:
  37. Peuhkuri, T. (2002). Knowledge and interpretation in environmental conflict: Fish farming and eutrophication in the Archipelago Sea, SW Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning Vol.61, Issues 2-4: 157–168.
    連結:
  38. Porritt, J. (1985). Seeing Green: The Politics of Ecology Explained. Oxford: Blackwell.
    連結:
  39. Rannikko, P. (1996). Local Environmental Conflicts and the Change in Environmental Consciousness. Acta Sociologica, Vol.39, No.1, 57-72.
    連結:
  40. Uhl, C. (2013). Developing ecological consciousness: the end of separation. Lanham : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    連結:
  41. Sessions, G. (2009). The Deep Ecology Movement: A Review. Environmental Review: ER, Vol.11, No.2, 105-125.
    連結:
  42. Smith, M.B. (1998). The Value of A Tree: Public Debates of John Muir and Gifford Pinchott, Historian Vol.60, Issue 4, 757-778.
    連結:
  43. Stockholm. (1972). Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. Retrieved April 26, 2014, from http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=97&articleid=1503.
    連結:
  44. Vandenberg, A. (2000). Citizenship and Democracy in a Global Era. New York: ST. Martin`s Press.
    連結:
  45. Ventriss, C. (1989). Toward a Public Philosophy of Public Administration: A Civic Perspective of the Public. Public Administration Review, Vol.49, No.2, 173-179.
    連結:
  46. Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning From Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: The Free Press.
    連結:
  47. 中文文獻:
  48. 朱柔若(譯)(1996)。社會科學研究方法與資料分析(Thomas Herzog原著)。台北市:揚智。
  49. 何明修(2006)。綠色民主:台灣環境運動的研究。台北市:群學。
  50. 林欽榮(1997)。社會科學概論。台北:龍騰。
  51. 施信民(2006)。台灣環境運動史料彙編。國史館。
  52. 孫健智(譯)(2013)。認真對待權利(Ronald Dworkin原著)。台北市:五南。
  53. 章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊主編(2011)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫:第六期
  54.   第一次調查計畫執行報告。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。
  55. 葉至誠(2009)。社會科學概論。台北市:揚智。
  56. 樂為良(譯)(2011)。正義:一場思辨之旅(Michael J. Sandel原著)。台北:雅言文化。
  57. 陳怡珍(譯)(2008)。社會科學研究方法(Chava Frankfort-Nachmias與David Nachmias原著)。台北市:台灣西書。
  58. 蕭新煌(2001)。台灣民眾環境意識的轉變。載於邊燕杰、涂肇慶、蘇耀昌(編),華人社會的調查研究方法與發現(頁103-139)。Hong Kong: Oxford University Press。
  59. 蕭新煌、朱雲鵬、蔣本基、劉小如、紀駿傑、林俊全(2003)。永續台灣2011。台北市:天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
  60. 外文文獻:
  61. Bellamy, R. & Palumbo, A. (2010).Citizenship. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  62. Bunyard, P. & Morgan-Grenville, F. (1987). The Green Alternative: Guide to Good Living. London: Methuen.
  63. Bui, M.H. (2005). Environmental Marketing: A Model of Consumer Behavior. In Johnston, T.C. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Marketing Educators (pp.20-28). Tennessee: The University of Tennessee
  64. Carter, R.L. & Simmons, B.(2010). The History and Philosophy of Environmental Education.In Bodzin, A.M. & Klein, B.S. & Weaver, S. (Eds.), The Inclusion of Environmental Education in Science Teacher Education (p.3-16). 978-90-481-9222-9 (Online)
  65. Cox, R. (2013). Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina.
  66. Devall, B. (1980). The Deep Ecology Movement. Nature Resources Journal 20, 299-322.
  67. Drengson, A.& Devall, B.& Schroll, M, A. (2011). The deep ecology movement: Qrigins, Development, and Future Propects. (Toward a Transpersonal Ecosophy), International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, Vol.30, No.1-2, 101-107.
  68. Drengson, A. & Inoue, Y. (Eds). (1995). The deep ecology movement: An introductory anthology. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books. (Published in Japanese, 2002)
  69. Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  70. Eyerman, R. & Jamison, A. (1991). Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State Univwesity Press.
  71. Hayward, T. (2004). Constitutional Environmental Rights, Online: Oxford Scholarship Online.
  72. Hoffman, J. (2004). Citizenship beyond the state. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  73. Hussey, H. & Thompson, P. 2000. The roots of Environmental Consciousness: Popular tradition and personal experience. London and New York:
  74. Irwin, T. (1977). Plato's moral theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  75. Kantola, I. & Konttinen, A. (1994). Energiatietamys projektien aikakaudella (English Abstract: Energy-related Cognizance in the Age of Projects). Energy Publications of the Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki 14.
  76. Kerlinger, F.N.(1986). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt.
  77. Meadows, D.H. & Meadows, D.L. & Randers, J. (1992).Beyond the Limits: Global Collapse or a Sustainable. Post Mills, Vt.: Chelsea Green Pub.
  78. Naess, A. (2008e). The three great movement. , In A.Drengson & B. Devall (Eds.), The ecology of wisdom, 99-104, Canada: Counterpoint Press.
  79. Pinchott, G. (1901).Trees and Civilization, World’s Work 2: 986.
  80. Purdy, J. (2013). Our Place in the World: A New Relationship for Environmental Ethics and Law. Duke Law Journal Vol.62, No.4: 857-932.
  81. Salter, L. (1988). Mandated Science: Science and Scientists in the Making of Standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortrecht.
  82. Sánchez, M. J. & Regina, L. (2010). Defining and measuring environmental consciousness, Revista Internacional de Sociología (RIS ) Vol.68, No.3, Septiembre-Diciembre, 731-755.
  83. Sharma, N. & Kesherwani, S.(2015). Encouraging Green Purchasing Behavior by Increasing Environmental Consciousness. In Das, J.K. & Zameer, A. & Narula, A. & Tripati, R. (Eds.), Reinventing Marketing for Emerging Markets (p.288-301). India: Bloombury Publishing
  84. Shelton, D. (2006). Human right and the environmental: what specific rights have been recognized? Denver journal of international law and policy. Vol.35 No.1, 129-171
  85. Turner, B.S. (1990). Outline of a theory of citizenship. In Bellamy, R. & Palumbo, A. (Eds.), Citizenship (p.73-97) Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Times Cited
  1. 簡汝珊(2017)。我國環境法規對戴奧辛管制之研究。中興大學法律學系碩士班學位論文。2017。1-155。