Title

時間距離對損失趨避、極端趨避及規避決策影響之研究

Translated Titles

The effect of temporal distance on loss aversion、extremeness aversion and no-choice.

Authors

陳煜文

Key Words

時間距離 ; 損失趨避 ; 極端趨避 ; 強迫選擇 ; 規避決策 ; Temporal Distance ; Loss Aversion ; Extremeness Aversion ; Forced Choice ; No-Choice

PublicationName

臺中科技大學企業管理系事業經營碩士班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2012年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

吳佩勳

Content Language

繁體中文

English Abstract

Recent decision research has found the presence of loss aversion and extremeness aversion in choice. Past researches concerning consumer preferences mostly address forced choices. However, the consumers do have one more choice – no-choice on the current proposal. The temporal distance has been explored in construal level theory, but past studies didn’t take into account the effects that temporal distance poses on loss aversion, extremeness aversion and no-choice. Therefore, the subject which Study 1 is trying to explore is the effects of temporal distance on loss aversion, and the study will verify that when the temporal distance is shorter, the choice would be the proposal with fewer losses. When the temporal distance is longer, however, the proposal with more gains would be chosen. Study 2 aims at exploring the effects temporal distance has on extremeness aversion and verifying that when the temporal distance is shorter, the all-average option would be chosen at a higher percentage than the extremeness option, while the temporal distance is longer, the extremeness option would be higher than the all-average option. Study 3 will explore the effects temporal distance has on no-choice and verify that when the extremeness option and no-choice are both available and when the temporal distance is shorter, a higher percentage of choices would go to no-choice. On the other hand, when the temporal distance is longer, the percentage for choosing no-choice would be lower. The present research also discussed the theoretical and practical implications derived from the research results.

Topic Category 商學院 > 企業管理系事業經營碩士班
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 1.林建煌 (2006)。消費者行為概論。台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
    連結:
  2. 1. Ahituv, N., Igbaria, M., & Sella, A. (1998). The effect of time pressure and completeness of information on decision making. Journal of Management Information System, 15, 153-172.
    連結:
  3. 2. Ben zur, H., & Breznitz, S. J. (1981). The effects of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychologica, 47, 89-104.
    連結:
  4. 3. Buehler, R., & McFarland, C. (2001). Intensity bias in affective forecasting: The role of temporal focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1480-1493.
    連結:
  5. 4. Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the planning fallacy: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 366-381.
    連結:
  6. 5. Dhar, R., (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 215-231.
    連結:
  7. 6. Dhar, R., & Stephen M. Nowlis (1999). The effect of time pressure on consumer choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(4), 369-384.
    連結:
  8. 7. Dhar, R., Stephen M. Nowlis & Steven J. Sherman (2000). Trying hard or hardly trying: An analysis of context effects in choice. Journal of consumer psychology, 9(4), 189-200.
    連結:
  9. 8. Dhar, R. & Simonson, Itamar. (2003). The effect of forced choice on Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2), 146-160.
    連結:
  10. 9. Edland, A., & Svenson, O. (1993). Judgment and decision making under time pressure. Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making, New York: Plenum, 27-40.
    連結:
  11. 10. Fishbach, A., & Dhar, R. (2005). Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 370-377.
    連結:
  12. 11. Freitas, A.L., Gollwitzer, P.M., & Trope, Y. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739-752.
    連結:
  13. 12. Gilovich, T., Kerr, M., & Medvec, V. (1993). Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64, 552-560.
    連結:
  14. 14. Griffin, D., & Ross, L. (1991). Subjective construal, social inference and human misunderstanding. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 319-359). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    連結:
  15. 15. Hardie, Bruce G.S., Eric J. Johnson, & Peter S. Fader (1993). Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science, 12, 378-394.
    連結:
  16. 16. Huber, J., & Puto, C. (1983). Market boundaries and product choice: Illustrating attraction and substitution. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 31-44.
    連結:
  17. 17. Idson, L.C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E.T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 252-274.
    連結:
  18. 18. Janis, I. L. & Mann, L. (1977). Decision Making: A psychological of Conflict. Choice and Commitment. New York: The Free Press.
    連結:
  19. 20. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
    連結:
  20. 21. Kahneman, D., Jack L. Knetsch, & Thaler, R.(1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and the status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspective, 5, 193-206.
    連結:
  21. 22. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1984). Choice, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
    連結:
  22. 24. Kardes, Frank R., Maria L. Cronley, & Kim, J. (2006). Construal-level effects on preference stability, preference-behavior correspondence, and the suppression of competing brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 135-144.
    連結:
  23. 25. LeBoeuf, R. (2006). Discount rates for time versus dates: The sensitivity of discounting to time-interval description. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 59-72.
    連結:
  24. 26. Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B., & Dube, L. (1995). Waiting time and decision making: Is time like money? Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 110-119.
    連結:
  25. 27. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.
    連結:
  26. 28. Liberman, N., Sagristano, M., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523-534.
    連結:
  27. 30. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 113-117.
    連結:
  28. 31. Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Predicting the intensity of losses vs. non-gains and non-losses vs. gains in judging fairness and value: A test of the loss aversion explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 527-534.
    連結:
  29. 32. Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Economic Journal, 97, 666-684.
    連結:
  30. 33. Luce, M. F. (1998). Choosing to avoid: Coping with negatively emotion-laden choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(4), 369-384.
    連結:
  31. 34. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior.
    連結:
  32. 35. Mogilner, C, Aaker, J. L. & Pennington, G. L. (2008). Time will tell: Distant appeal of promotion and imminent appeal of prevention. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 670-681.
    連結:
  33. 36. Nisan, M. (1972). Dimension of time in relation to choice behavior and achievement orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 175-182.
    連結:
  34. 37. Ordonez, L., & Benson, L. (1997). Decisions under time pressure: How time constraint affects risky decision making. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 121-140.
    連結:
  35. 38. Payne, John W., Bettman, J.R., & Johnson, Eric J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 534-552.
    連結:
  36. 39. Revelle, W., Amaral, P., & Turriff, S. (1976). Introversion-extraversion, time stress, and caffeine: The effect on verbal performance. Science, 192, 149-150
    連結:
  37. 40. Sanna, L. J. (1999). Mental simulations, affect, and subjective confidence: Timing is everything. Psychological Science, 10, 339-345.
    連結:
  38. 41. Shepperd, J. A., Ouellette, J.A., & Fernandez, J. K. (1996). Abandoning unrealistic optimism: Performance estimates and the temporal proximity of self-relevant feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 844-855.
    連結:
  39. 42. Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158-174.
    連結:
  40. 43. Simonson, I., & Tversky, A.(1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 281-295.
    連結:
  41. 44. Simonson, I., Nowlis, S. M., & Lemon, K.(1993). The effect of local consideration sets on global choice between lower price and higher quality. Marketing Science, 12, 357-377.
    連結:
  42. 45. Smith, J. F., Mitchell T. R., & Beach L. R. (1982). A cost-benefit mechanism for selecting problem-solving strategies: Some extension and empirical tests. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 370-396.
    連結:
  43. 47. Svenson, Edland L., A., & Slovic P. (1990). Choices and judgments of incompletely described decision alternatives under time pressure. Acta Psychological, 75, 153-169.
    連結:
  44. 48. Thaler, R.H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.
    連結:
  45. 49. Thaler, R.H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199-214.
    連結:
  46. 50. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876-889.
    連結:
  47. 51. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.
    連結:
  48. 52. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
    連結:
  49. 53. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice:A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1061.
    連結:
  50. 54. Tversky, A & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decision. Journal of Business, 59, 521-278.
    連結:
  51. 55. Wernerfelt, B. (1995). A Rational reconstruction of the compromise effect: Using market data to infer utilities. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 627-633.
    連結:
  52. 56. Wright, P. (1974). The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 555-561.
    連結:
  53. 57. Zauberman, G., & Lynch, J. G. (2005). Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time versus money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(1), 23-37.
    連結:
  54. 58. Zeelenberg, M., & Beattie, J. (1997). Consequences of regret aversion 2: Additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 72, 63-78.
    連結:
  55. 59. Zeelenberg, M., Beattie, J., Van Der Plight, & Nanne K, Devries (1996). Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 148-158.
    連結:
  56. 一、中文部分
  57. 2.吳明隆 (2010)。論文寫作與量化研究。台北:五南出版股份有限公司。
  58. 3.陳順宇、鄭碧娥 (2002)。實驗設計。台北:華泰書局。
  59. 二、英文部分
  60. 13. Gollwitzer, P.M., & Moskowitz, G.B. (1996). Goal effects on action and cognition. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.). Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles (pp. 361-399). New York: The Guilford Press.
  61. 19. Johnson, E.J., Payne, J.W., & Bettman, J.R. (1993). Adapting to time constraints. In O. Svenson & J. Maule (Eds.). Time Pressure and Stress in Judgment and Decision Making. New York: Plenum.
  62. 23. Kaplan, M. F., Wanshula, L.T., & Zanna, M.P. (1993). Time pressure and information integration in social judgement. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule. Time pressure and stress in human judgement and decision making (pp. 255-267). New York: Plenum.
  63. 29. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. New York: Guilford Press.
  64. 46. Svenson, O., & Benson, L. (1993). Framing and time pressure in decision making. Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making(pp.133-144), New York: Plenum Press.