透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.135.213.214
  • 學位論文

機構投資人對銀行採行赤道原則之評價

The Institutional Investors Evaluate the Event of Bank Adopting The Equator Principles

指導教授 : 張允文

摘要


本研究以赤道原則 (Equator Principles,以下簡稱EP) 的角度,探討機構投資人認為EP在投資決策的有用性,銀行企業社會責任 (Corporate Social Responsibility,以下簡稱CSR) 績效高低對於簽署EP的影響,以及銀行採行 EP 的評價為何。   針對北部地區具有相當投資經驗之基金經理人以及壽險公司投資部人員共計173位,以實驗設計的方式進行測驗。本研究結果發現,(1)機構投資人普遍認為EP在投資決策的有用性皆小於財務資訊、治理資訊以及CSR資訊,(2)在銀行的CSR績效皆高於同業時,機構投資人對銀行有無簽署EP的評價不會有顯著的差異,(3)在銀行的CSR績效低於同業時,機構投資人對銀行有簽署EP的評價顯著高於沒有簽署EP的評價。本研究進一步發現,機構投資人對於銀行有簽署EP的評價顯著高於沒有簽署EP的評價。

並列摘要


This study disscussed on the usefulness of Equator Principles (EP) for institutional investors when making investment decisions. The research compared the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) performance and the evaluation of adopting the EP for bank.   We used the experimental design method to analyze the 173 institutional investors who had quite investment experience in the northen region of Taiwan.The result of this study were as follow:   First, the institution investors generally regarded the usefulness of the EP in the investment decision-making was lower than financial information, governance information and CSR information. Second, when bank’s CSR performance was higher than the average of industry, the institutional investors evaluated the effect of adopting EP or not, there will be no significant difference. Third, when bank’s CSR performance was lower than the average of industry, the institutional investors evaluated the effect of adopting EP was significantly higher than did not adopt EP. This study further found that the institutional investors evaluated higher P/E ratio of bank, which adopted the EP than the bank did not adopt EP.

參考文獻


蔡慶年,2014,企融業的企業道德與社會責任專題報導。
林佳靜、蘇郁升,2015,低本益比選股策略之投資績效評估,管理資訊計算,第二期:138-158。
池祥麟、陳庭萱,2004,銀行業企業社會責任之探討,台灣金融財務季刊,第5輯第二期:111-127。
劉漢榆、陳文姿,2012,從綠色智慧資本探討我國銀行業永續經營導向之效益,輔仁管理評論,第十九卷第一期:73-94。
陳立文、余歆儀、紀怡禎,2016,公司本益比和產業平均本益比之間的偏離程度與橫斷面股票報酬:風險或行為,Review of Securities and Futures Markets,28:1,1-38

延伸閱讀