Translated Titles

A Study of Application Habitual Domain and Analytic Hierarchy Process to explore Air Force Volunteer Soldiers - by The Case of A Certain Air Force Base





Key Words

志願役士兵 ; 離退 ; 習慣領域理論 ; 層級程序分析法 ; Volunteer Soldiers ; Retired ; Habit field theory ; Analytic Hierarchy Process



Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication


Academic Degree Category




Content Language


Chinese Abstract

本研究主要在探討影響空軍某單位志願役士兵離退之考量因素,雖然國內外有關員工離職的研究甚多,研究者亦提出許多相關理論及評估分析方法,然而國軍工作任務特殊,加上近年實施多波組織精簡政策,造成影響志願役士兵離退的考量層面多變。本研究希藉由分析影響空軍某單位志願役士兵離退之主要原因,據以提供個案單位,甚至是其他國軍單位,於制訂相關政策之參考及精進方向。 而為了解近年志願役士兵的離退因素,本研究運用習慣領域理論並結合層級程序分析法(AHP)進行研究分析,希冀望綜合各專家之見解,並透過個案單位志願役士兵之訪談,探究志願役士兵離退之因素,以謀求改善方案,進而降低志願役士兵之離退率;本研究結果及建議: ㄧ、「工作環境」層面:為次要影響因素;軍人之工作性質特殊,以完成任務為優先考量,如能調整人員的工作及實施正常休假,將可大幅提升其工作效率,並減少人員的倦怠感。 二、「薪資福利」層面:為主要影響因素;軍中薪資以官階、職務及年資為計算基準,如何合理分配任務,並重新調整薪資結構及增加福利等相關措施,將能大幅降低志願役士兵的離退率。 三、「晉陞發展」層面:影響因素最低;軍中的晉陞制度已相當完善,只要秉持公平、公正、公開之原則,即可大幅降低爭議性。 四、「領導幹部」層面:為第三項影響因素;部隊任務的遂行,需要共同合作來完成,改善長官與部屬間的互動關係,並加強領導幹部的教育訓練,亦相當重要。 綜合以上研究資料,可得知「薪資福利」與「工作環境」層面為主要影響離退之考量因素,且兩層面息息相關。因此,如能同時改善薪資結構與工作負荷,將可大幅減少離退率,故為首要改善目標;另本研究結果,亦可提供其它同性質之國軍單位及民間機構,作為政策制訂及工作改進之參考。

English Abstract

This study is to investigate the factors that influence the Volunteer Soldiers in a certain Air Force Base to consider retirement. There are numerous studies both domestic and from abroad that look into the employee’s resignation, and researchers propose many theories and analytical methods to assess the issue as well. However, the distinctive military tasks and several times organizational streamlining varied the consideration of the Volunteer Soldiers’ resignation. In this study, by analyzing the main reasons which effect the Volunteer Soldiers’ resignation in a certain Air Force Base; we presented the reference and the direction to either the case unit or the other military departments for improvement and policies formulating. In this study, we research and analyze by means of the field of theoretical study habits and combine using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in order to understand the factors that affect the Volunteer Soldiers to consider retirement. Through the comprehensive view of experts and the interview of the case unit Volunteer Soldiers, hopefully we can have the program to improve and reduce the rate of Volunteer Soldiers retirement. Here are some results and recommendations: First, the “work environment” dimension, as the secondary factors: the intrinsic quality of military workload is relatively inimitable. Fulfilling all the tasks is the military top priority. Therefore, it will definitely improve the efficiency and reduce the rate of Volunteer Soldiers retirement if the military can adjust their workload and guarantee regular period of leaves to their Volunteer Soldiers. Second, the “remuneration and benefits”, as the main factors: military salaries based on the rank, the position, and the seniority. Reasonably allocate the military tasks, re-adjust the salary structure and workload, and increase the welfare measures will be able to significantly reduce the rate of Volunteer Soldiers retirement. Third, the "promotion of development" dimension: the impact of minimum factor; military promotion system has been quite perfect, as long as uphold fairness, justice and the principles of open, you can significantly reduce controversy. Fourth, the “leading cadres”, as the third term factors: military tasks fulfilling depends on teamwork. Consequently, ameliorating the interaction and relationship between executive leaders and subordinates, and enforcing the leadership education to the leading cadres are rather important. Based on the research data, we learned that the “salaries and benefits” and the “work environment” are the main factors that affect the Volunteer Soldiers to consider retirement. Furthermore, both factors influence and connect with each other as well. As a result, simultaneously ameliorate the salary structure and workload to reduce the rate of Volunteer Soldiers retirement will be the primary goal of improvement. Additionally, this study may also offer the reference and the direction to the other military unit and civilian agencies for improvement and policies formulating.

Topic Category 管理學院 > 工業管理學系
工程學 > 工程學總論
社會科學 > 管理學
  1. 翁進勳(2002),台北市國民中小學校警工作滿意與服務士氣關係之研究,國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
  2. 張筱雯(2002),知識管理與員工滿意度之個案研究-以中央健保局南區分局為例,國立成功大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
  3. 陳俊龍(2006),影響員工留任意願及離職傾向因素之探討-誠品書店為例,國立成功大學企業管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
  4. 黃婉菁(2003),從工作生活品質、工作壓力觀念探討論社會工作者對專業生涯承諾之相關研究,高雄醫學大學未出版碩士論文。
  5. 趙子維(2012),志願役士兵留營意願影響因素之研究,朝陽科技大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文。
  6. 劉孝堂(2008),我國志願士兵招募制度可行性之研究,國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班未出版碩士論文。
  7. 謝佳玲(2013),我國志願役士兵離職原因之研究-以空軍各基地為例,空軍學術雙月刊,637期,pp.93-109。
  8. Adams J.S.(1965), Inequity in Social Exchanges, N.Y:Academic Press.
  9. Bluedorn, A. C.(1982), A Unified Model of Turnover from Organization, Human Relations, Vol.35, 90.
  10. Cribbin, J. J.(1972), Effective Managerial Leadership, American Management Association.
  11. Hackman, J. R. & Lawler, E. E.(1971), Employee Reactions to Job Characteristics, Journal of Applied Psychology, 55:pp.259-286.
  12. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R.(1975), Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, pp.159-170.
  13. Jackson, P. R., Wall, T. D., Martin, R., & Davids, K.(1993), New measures of job control, cognitive demand, and production responsibility, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: pp. 753-762.
  14. Kalleberg, A. L.(1977), Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction, American Sociological Review, 42,pp.124-143.
  15. Locke, E.(1976), The nature and causes of job satisfaction, In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), and book of industrial and organizational psychology pp.1297-1349, Chicago: Rand McNally.
  16. Maslow, A.(1954), Motivation and Personality, New York: Harper & Row.
  17. Mobley, W. H.(1977), Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover Journal of Applied Psychology,62:238.
  18. Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O. & Hollingsworth, A. T.(1978), An Evaluation of Precursors of Hospital Employee Turnover, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63,pp.408-414.
  19. Miller, H. E. Katerberg & Hulin, C. L.(1979), Evaluation of the mobley, horner, and hollingsworth model of employee turnover, Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 509-517.
  20. Michaels, C. E. & Spector, P. E.(1982), Causes of Employee Turnover: A Test of The Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino Model, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.,67(1), pp.53-59.
  21. Perrow, C.(1967), A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organization, American Sociological Review, Vol.32, pp.194-208.
  22. Seashore, S.E. & Taber, T.D(1975), Job Satisfaction Indicators and Their Correlations, American Behavioral Scientist, 18, pp.333-368.
  23. Turner, A.N. & Lawrence, P.R.(1965), Industrial jobs and the worker. Boston: Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.
  24. Taylor, F. W.(1911), The principles of scientific management, New York: Harper-Row.
  25. Vroom, V. H.(1962), Ego-involvement, job satisfaction, and job performance, Personnel Psychology,15:pp.159-177.
  26. 壹、中文部分
  27. 丁一倫(2002),影響員工離職傾向因素之探討-以台中地區國際觀光旅館為例,朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系未出版碩士論文。
  28. 王祥昀(2007),飛機修護從業人員離職傾向之研究-以國軍發動機修護專業單位為例,國立東華大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
  29. 中華民國102年四年期國防總檢討編纂委員會(2013),中華民國102年四年期國防總檢討(初版),台北:國防部。
  30. 中華民國102年國防報告書編纂委員會(2013),中華民國102年國防報告書(初版),台北:國防部。
  31. 立法院(2011),國軍專業志願士兵轉服士官甄選規定,國防法規。
  32. 立法院(2013),志願士兵服役條例,國防法規。
  33. 立法院(2013),兵役法,國防法規。
  34. 沈文恕(1978),工作特性與工作滿足之關係,政治大學企研所未出版碩士論文。
  35. 吳清基(1992),教育與行政,台北:師大書苑。
  36. 林惠姿(2003),會計人員工作壓力與離職意願關係之研究-以台北市政府主計處從業人員為例,國立政治大學行政管理系未出版之碩士論文。
  37. 計宏謀(2010),教職員工離職傾向之研究-以基隆某技術學院為例,南華大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文。
  38. 郝昇騰(2010),志願役士兵離退傾向之探討:以南部空軍某部隊為例,義守大學管理學院未出版碩士論文。
  39. 國防部(2014),國軍103年專業志願士兵暨儲備士官甄選簡章,招生簡章。
  40. 游伯龍(1987),行為的新境界,台北:聯經出版社。
  41. 游伯龍(1993),智慧亁坤袋(初版),台北:洪建全基金會。
  42. 鈕先鍾(1995)(譯),戰爭的藝術,台北:國防部史編局,pp.70-73。(譯自Antoine De Jomini,1838)。
  43. 湛瑄宇(2000),員工薪資滿足之前因後果之研究,中原大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
  44. 黃蘭淳(2000),高雄地區公營廣播電台從業人員離職傾向及離職行為因素之研究,國立中山大學傳播管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
  45. 馮逸成(2005),公務人員離職因素的研究-以國防部為例,世新大學行政管理學系未出版碩士論文。
  46. 黃秀慧(2009),國軍志願役士兵留營意願之探究─工作價值觀、工作滿意度與組織承諾因素,樹德科技大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
  47. 鄧振源、曾國雄(1989),層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上),中國統計學報,第27卷第6期,pp.5-22。
  48. 鄧振源、曾國雄(1989),層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下),中國統計學報,第27 卷,第7 期,pp.1-20。
  49. 蔡文玉(2012),影響壽險業務員離職傾向之研究,國立東華大學管理學院高階經營管理未出版碩士論文。
  50. 謝函融(2005),工作投入對工作價值觀與離職傾向間關係之研究,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
  51. 貳、英文部分
  52. Hoppock(1935), Job satisfaction, New York: Harper & Row.
  53. Herzberg, B. M.(1959), The Motivation to Work. New York: John Wiley.
  54. Porter, L. W. & Lawler, E. E.(1968), Managerial Attitudes & Performance, Homewood: Richard D, Irwin, Inc .
  55. Price, J. L.(1977), The Study of Turnover, Ames: University of Iowa Press.
  56. Robbins, S. P.(1996), Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
  57. Skinner, W.(1969), Manufacturing-missing link in corporate strategy, Harvard business review, May-June,pp.136-145.
  58. Szilagyi, A. D.(1979), Keeping Employee Turnover under Control, Personal, The Management of People at Work,pp.42-52.
  59. Vroom, V. H.(1964), Work and motivation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.