Title

公司被併購前後期對服務品質差異之探討─以A壽險公司為例

Translated Titles

A Study on the change of service quality, before and after the merger and acquisition-A Life Insurance company

Authors

蔡宛貽

Key Words

服務品質 ; 管制界限 ; 績效評估矩陣 ; 顧客滿意度 ; 併購 ; merged ; customer satisfaction ; performance evaluation matrix ; service quality ; control limits

PublicationName

朝陽科技大學保險金融管理系學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2011年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

嚴宗銘;邱國欽

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

全球壽險業在金融海嘯影響下形成多家台灣本土壽險業與外商公司合併。壽險公司透過併購能提高市佔率及擴大經濟規模,但仍有可能因為文化上的差異或其他因素,而影響到服務品質。在這競爭激烈的環境下,服務品質與顧客滿意將成為壽險業生存的重要指標。本研究以壽險A公司為例,採用問卷方式,首先,對目標公司(被併購公司)被併購之後期對保戶服務滿意度之滿意度22個題項利用因素分析萃取出3個構面,分別對各背景變項(因子)作差異分析,以了解不同族群對服務滿意度認知的差異。另外,針對目標公司被併購前後時段對保戶所提供的服務品質之滿意度是否有差異,本研究利用簡單易懂的績效評估矩陣含績效管制界限的圖形,找出需要改善的服務題項。本研究結果發現,從22個服務題項中,檢視有4個異常題項需要改善。本研究針對這4個需改善題項建議分別對基本資料各變項(因子)作差異分析,試圖找出各題項認知較低族群作為改善對象,以擬定改善策略並評估執行成效,此過程可提供相關產業經營者作參考依據。

English Abstract

The global financial crisis advanced the merger and acquisition of Taiwanese and foreign life insurance company. Through mergers and acquisitions, life insurance companies can increase market shares and scale economies, however, there is still a possibility that cultural differences or other factors will affect the quality of service. In this highly competitive environment, service quality and customer satisfaction are important for the survival of life insurance industry. First, by applying questionnaires to target company (A Life Insurance Company), and adopting factor analysis to extract three aspects from 22 satisfaction items to analyze the background variables (factor) and understand customer satisfaction among different ethnic groups. In addition, to determine if there is a difference on services provided to policyholders between periods before and after the acquisition, this study performed straightforward evaluation matrix containing graphics to identify areas of improvement for service items. The results showed four out of 22 items need improvement. In this study, these four items recommended were the need to improve on the basic information of each variable (factor) for the difference analysis, to try to find the items to improve object recognition as a low population, in order to develop strategies and evaluate the end results. This process can be adopted by industry as reference.

Topic Category 管理學院 > 保險金融管理系
社會科學 > 經濟學
Reference
  1. 1.王伊竹(2009)。應用六標準差建構保險金融從業人員對核心能力
    連結:
  2. 3.王曉娟(2010)。顧客對投資型保單滿意度與再購意願的探討。碩
    連結:
  3. 7.吳繡竹(2009)。保險金融從業人員對服務品質績效評估之研究。
    連結:
  4. 8.宋佩芬(2010)。應用績效評估矩陣方法探討學童學習成效。碩士
    連結:
  5. 9.林素鈺(2004)。服務品質模式之演變。品質月刊。471,68-74。
    連結:
  6. 宿業服務品質之研究。中小企業發展季刊。16,1-24。
    連結:
  7. 12.阮瀚泓(2010)。股票投資獲利滿意度與績效評估。碩士論文,
    連結:
  8. 14.譚珮怡(2009)。應用績效評估矩陣方法探討企業內部溝通問題
    連結:
  9. Friendly Acquisition. Harvard Business Review, 78(6),
    連結:
  10. 2.Bhote, K. R. (1996). Beyond Customer Satisfaction to
    連結:
  11. American Management Association, New York.
    連結:
  12. Customers’ Assessments of Service Quality and Value. The
    連結:
  13. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4), 375-384.
    連結:
  14. 4.Chapman, R. G. (1993). Brand Performance Comparative.
    連結:
  15. Segmentation of Bank Commercial Markets. International
    連結:
  16. Journal of Bank Marketing, 7(6), 25-30.
    連結:
  17. 6.Chen, S. C., Chen, K. S. & Hsia, T. C. (2005). Prompting
    連結:
  18. (2008). The Use of Importance Performance Analysis for
    連結:
  19. Evaluating the Cinema Service Quality. Journal of
    連結:
  20. Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of
    連結:
  21. Acquisition. The Wall Street Journal, 28.
    連結:
  22. Sector Multinationals. Multinational Enterprises in the
    連結:
  23. Lawrence Erlbum.
    連結:
  24. 13.Hemple, D. J. (1977). Consumer Satisfaction with the
    連結:
  25. Home Buying Process: Conceptualization and Measurement.
    連結:
  26. Marketing Science Institute.
    連結:
  27. 14.Hsia, T. C., Chen, S. C. & Chen, K. S. (2009).
    連結:
  28. Enhancement of Service Quality in Internet-Marketing
    連結:
  29. the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 26(1),
    連結:
  30. 15.Hung, Y. H., Huang, M. L. & Chen, K. S. (2003). Service
    連結:
  31. Quality Evaluation by Service Quality Performance
    連結:
  32. Matrix. Total quality management, 14(1), 79-89.
    連結:
  33. Computers to Factor Analysis. Educational and
    連結:
  34. Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
    連結:
  35. 18.Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing Management: Analysis,
    連結:
  36. Competitive Analysis for Logistics Decisions.
    連結:
  37. International Journal of Physical Distribution &
    連結:
  38. Logistics Management, 20(1), 17-24.
    連結:
  39. 20.Lambert, D. M. & Stock, J. R. (1993). Strategic
    連結:
  40. 21.Lin, W. T., Chen, S. C. & Chen, K. S. (2006). Evaluation
    連結:
  41. Analysis of Brand Loyalty for Major Household
    連結:
  42. Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decision.
    連結:
  43. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469.
    連結:
  44. Delight: Foundations, Findings and Managerial Insight.
    連結:
  45. Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 311-336.
    連結:
  46. Quality Counts in Service, Too. Business Horizons,
    連結:
  47. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its
    連結:
  48. Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing,
    連結:
  49. Servqual: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer
    連結:
  50. Understanding Consumer Expectation of Service. Sloan
    連結:
  51. 32.Prus, A. & Brandt, B. D. (1995). Understanding Your
    連結:
  52. Customers. Marketing Tolls, 2(5), 10-14.
    連結:
  53. 33.Reynolds, F. D., Darden, W. R. & Martin, W. S. (1974).
    連結:
  54. Harvard Business Review, 65-75.
    連結:
  55. 參考文獻
  56. 一、中文文獻
  57. 績效評估之研究。碩士論文,朝陽科技大學保險金融管理所碩士論
  58. 文,台中。
  59. 2.方世榮(2010)。統計學導論(第六版)。華泰書局。
  60. 士論文,朝陽科技大學財務金融所碩士論文,台中。
  61. 4.方雪俐(2011)。二成三國人擔心壽險公司安全,現代保險健康理
  62. 財雜誌。
  63. 5.余尚武、汪玉柏(1998)。影響企業併購成敗知因素與策略探討。
  64. 經濟情勢暨評論。4(2),125-146。
  65. 6.吳明隆(2009)。SPSS操作與應用(第二版)。台北:五南圖書公
  66. 司。
  67. 碩士論文,朝陽科技大學保險金融管理所碩士論文,台中。
  68. 論文,朝陽科技大學財務金融所碩士論文,台中。
  69. 10.洪彰鴻、蘇榮基、何添生(2005)。國立勤益技術學院全球運動會
  70. 服務品質之探討。勤益學報。23(1),89-96。
  71. 11.邱國欽、李素箱、廖添進 (2010)。應用績效評估矩陣方法探討民
  72. 朝陽科技大學財務金融所碩士論文,台中。
  73. 13.陳順宇(2005)。多變量分析(第四版)。台北:華泰文化出版
  74. 社。
  75. —以台灣T銀行為例。碩士論文,朝陽科技大學保險金融管理所碩
  76. 士論文,台中。
  77. 二、英文文獻
  78. 1.Aiello, R. J., & Watkins M. D. (2000). The Fine Art of
  79. 100-107.
  80. Customer Loyalty: The Key to Greater Profitability.
  81. 3.Bolton, R. N. & Drew, J. H. (1991). A Multistage Model of
  82. Journal of Products & Brand Management, 2(1), 42-50.
  83. 5.Cheron, E. J., McTavish, R. & Perrien, J. (1989).
  84. Customer Satisfactions by Applying Six Sigma: An Example
  85. from Automobile Industry. Quality Management Journal,
  86. 12(4), 21-33.
  87. 7.Cheng, L. Y., Peng, S. Y., Huang, C. H. & Yang, M. J.
  88. Quality, 15(3), 249-258.
  89. 8.Cronin, J. J. & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring Service
  90. Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
  91. 9.Drucker, P. F. (1981). The Five Rules of Successful
  92. 10.Enderwick, P. (1992). The Scale and Scope of Service
  93. World Economy (Buckley P. J. and Casson, M.).
  94. 11.Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D. & Miniard, P. W. (1995).
  95. Consumer Behavior (8th ed.). New York: Dryden Press.
  96. 12.Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ:
  97. through Application of the Six Sigma Process. Journal of
  98. 11-21.
  99. 16.Jones, T. O. & Sasser, W. E. (1995). Why Satisfied
  100. Customers Defect. Harvard Business Review, 73, 88-99.
  101. 17.Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The Application of Electronic
  102. Planning, Implementation and Control. (9th ed.,
  103. pp.465-488), New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International,
  104. Inc.
  105. 19.Lambert, D. M. & Sharma, A. (1990). A Customer-Based
  106. Logistics Management, (3rd ed.), IRWIN.
  107. of Performance in Introducing CE Marking on the European
  108. Market to the Machinery Industry in Taiwan.
  109. International Journal of Quality and Reliability
  110. Management, 22(5), 503-517.
  111. 22.Martilla, J. A. & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-
  112. Performance Analysis. Journal of Marking, 41(1), 77-79.
  113. 23.Newman, J. W. & Werbel, R. A. (1973). Multivariate
  114. Appliances. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(4),
  115. 404-409.
  116. 24.Nunnally, J. C. & Berstein, I. (1994). Psychometric
  117. Theory (3rd ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill.
  118. 25.Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the
  119. 26.Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A Behavioral
  120. Perspective on the Consumer. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  121. 27.Oliver, R. L., Rust, R. T. & Varki, S. (1997). Customer
  122. 28.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L. (1985a).
  123. 28(3), 44-53.
  124. 29.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L. (1985b).
  125. 49(4), 41-50.
  126. 30.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L. (1988).
  127. Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing,
  128. 64(1), 12-40.
  129. 31.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L. (1991).
  130. Management Review, Spring, 39-48.
  131. Developing an Image the Store-Loyal Customer. Journal of
  132. Retailing, 50(4), 73-84.
  133. 34.Taguchi, G. & Clausing, D. (1990). Robust Quality.
  134. 35.Thomas, P. (2003). The Six Sigma Project Planner. New
  135. York:McGraw.
  136. 36.Zeithaml, V. A. & Bitner, M. J. (1996). Service
  137. Marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Times Cited
  1. 簡于宸(2013)。應用績效評估矩陣探討企業經營績效之研究-以C保險公司為例。朝陽科技大學企業管理系學位論文。2013。1-69。
  2. 林佩君(2013)。企業客戶服務品質績效評估探討—以F 保險公司為例。朝陽科技大學財務金融系學位論文。2013。1-52。
  3. 王思淳(2015)。應用SIPA方法探討企業併購後對客戶服務品質之績效—以A保險公司為例。朝陽科技大學財務金融系學位論文。2015。1-59。
  4. 鍾宜芳(2015)。應用六標準差改善流程檢視企業服務品質改善成效─以L保險公司為例。朝陽科技大學財務金融系學位論文。2015。1-60。
  5. 張耿榮(2016)。應用績效評估矩陣對學生品德提昇之研究 -以台中市私立明道中學為例。朝陽科技大學企業管理系學位論文。2016。1-55。