Title

教-學序列研究對科學教學的啟示

Translated Titles

The Implications of Science Teaching from the Research in teaching-learning Sequence

DOI

10.6216/SEM.200910_(323).0001

Authors

林靜雯(Jing-Wen Lin);邱美虹(Mei-Hung Chiu)

Key Words

教育重建 ; 教-學序列 ; 教學實驗 ; 發展性研究 ; 學習路徑 ; Educational Reconstruction ; Teaching-learning Sequence ; Teaching Experiment ; Developmental Research ; Learning Pathway

PublicationName

科學教育月刊

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

323期(2009 / 10 / 01)

Page #

2 - 14

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

近年來,歐洲探究教學興起一種以特定科學主題爲導向,重視適當教-學序列設計的研究。此種研究以逐步演化的研究過程爲基礎,重視科學概念與學生先備概念之間相互交織所形成的複雜作用,並期望藉由特定段落或單一主題序列課程的循環發展與真實教室場景中深度教學的過程相連,形成新概念性的課程結構,最後促使學生成功學習。本文針對此種教-學序列研究的發展背景、理論及研究方法架構加以闡述及介紹。藉此引介,本文希冀對於國內科學教學有進一步的啟示。

English Abstract

In recent years, one notable line of inquiry which involves the design and implement of specific topic-oriented teaching-learning sequences for teaching science has risen in Europe. This kind of research is based on progressive evolutionary processes in research, focus on the complicated interactions between scientific and students' pre-concepts and expects to link with courses of depth teaching in the scene of real classroom with the circulation development of the specific paragraph or the single topic of sequence, to form the new conceptual structure of curriculum, and to help students to succeed in science learning finally. This article expounds the development background, theory and methodology about this kind research of teaching-learning sequence. With the introduction, this article hopes to bring some implications for Taiwanese science teaching further.

Topic Category 社會科學 > 教育學
Reference
  1. 林靜雯、邱美虹(2005)。整合類比與多重表徵研究取向探究多重類比設計對兒童電學概念學習之影響。科學教育學刊,13(3),317-345。
    連結:
  2. 邱美虹、林靜雯(2002)。以多重類比探究兒童電流心智模式之改變。科學教育學刊,10(2),109-134。
    連結:
  3. Aiello-Nicosia, M. L.,Sperandeo-Mineo, R. M.(2000).Educational reconstruction of physics content to be taught and of preservice teacher training: A case study.International Journal of Science Education,22(10),1085-1097.
  4. Airaksinen, S.,Nikinmaa, M.(1995).Effect of haemoglobin concentration on the oxygen affinity of intact lamprey erythrocytes.The Journal of Experimental Biology,198,2393-2396.
  5. Andersson, B.,Bach, F.,G. Welford (Eds.),J. Osborne (Eds.),P. Scott (Eds.)(1996).Research in science education in europe.London:Falmer Press.
  6. Arnold, M.,Millar, R.(1987).Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of introductory ideas in electricity.International Journal of Science Education,9(5),553-563.
  7. Asoko, H.,G. Welford (Eds.),J. Osborne (Eds.),P. Scott (Eds.)(1996).Research in science education in europe.London:Falmer Press.
  8. Boohan, R.(1996).Using a picture language to teach about processes of change.Paper presented at the Research in Science Education in Europe: Current Issues and Themes.
  9. Borges, A. T.,Gilbert, J. K.(1999).Mental models of electricity.International Journal of Science Education,21(1),98-117.
  10. Butts, W.(1985).Children's understanding of electric current in three countries.Research in Science Education,15,127-130.
  11. Campbell, D. T.,G. Radnitzky (Eds.),W. W. Bartley (Eds.)(1974).Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge.IL:Open Court.
  12. Carlton, K.(1999).Teaching electric current and electrical potential.Physical Education,34(6),341-345.
  13. Chang, C. Y.,Barufaldi, J. P.(1999).The use of a problem-solving-based instructional mode in initiating change in students' achievement and alternative frameworks.International Journal of Science Education,21(4),373-388.
  14. Chiu, M. H.,Lin, J. W.(2005).Promoting fourth graders' conceptual change of their understanding of electric current via multiple analogies.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(4),424-468.
  15. Chiu, M. H.,Lin, J. W.,I. V. Eriksson (Ed.)(2008).Science education in the 21st century.New York:Nova Science Publishers.
  16. Cohen, R.,R. Duit (Eds.),W. Jung (Eds.),C. von Rhoneck (Eds.)(1984).Aspects of understanding electricity, proceedings of the in ternational workshop.Ludwigsburg:IPN-Arbeitsberichte.
  17. Cropper, E. C.,Price, D.,Tenenbaum, R.,Kupfermann, I.,Weiss, K. R.(1990).Release of peptide cotransmitters from a cholinergic motor neuron under physiological conditions.Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of American,87(3),933-937.
  18. Driver, R.,Sauires, A.,Rushworth, P.,Wood-Robinson, V.(1994).Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas.London:Routledge.
  19. Duit, R.,Komorek, M.(1997).Understanding the basic ideas of chaos theory in a study of limited predictability.International Journal of Science Education,19,247-264.
  20. Dupin, J. J.,Johsua, S.(1987).Conceptions of French pupils concerning electric circuits: Structure and evolution.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,24(9),791-806.
  21. Dupin, J. J.,Johsua, S.,R. Duit (Eds.),W. Jung (Eds.),C. von Rhoneck (Eds.)(1984).Aspects of understanding electricity, proceedings of the international workshop.Ludwigsburg:IPN-Arbeitsberichte.
  22. Gentner, D. (Eds.),Gentner, D. R.,A. L. Stevens (Eds.)(1983).Mental models.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
  23. Glynn, S. M. (Eds.),Duit, R. (Eds.),Thiele, R. B.(1995).Learning science in school: Research reforming practice.Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawence Erlbaum Associates.
  24. Gott, R.(1984).Electricity at age 15: Science report for teachers. No 7, assessment of performance unit.London:Department of Education and Science.
  25. Härtel, H.(1982).The electric circuit as a system: A new approach.European Journal of Science Education,4(1),45-55.
  26. Haslam, F.,Treagust, D. F.(1987).Diagnosing secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument.Journal of Biological Education,21(3),203-211.
  27. Heller, P. M.,Finley, F. N.(1992).Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study in current electricity.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(3),259-275.
  28. Hewson, P. W.,Thorley, N. R.(1989).The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom.International Journal of Science Education,11,541-553.
  29. Hull, D. L.(1988).Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  30. Johsua, S.,Dupin, J. J.(1989).Repr'esentations et mod'elisations: Le 'd'ebat scientifique' dans la classe et l'apprentissage de la physique.Berne:Peter Lang.
  31. Kattmann, M.,Duit, R.,Gropengieber, H.,Komorek, M.(1995).A model of educational reconstruction.Paper presented at the National Associate of Research in Science Teaching.
  32. Komorek, M.,Duit, R.(2004).The teaching experiment as a powerful method to develop and evaluate teaching and learning sequences in the domain of non-linear systems.International Journal of Science Education,26(5),619-633.
  33. Lijnse, P.(1995)."Developmental research" as a way to an empirically based "didactical structure" of science.Science Education,79(2),189-199.
  34. Lijnse, P.,R. Millar (Eds.),J. Leach (Eds.),J. Osborne (Eds.)(2000).Improving science education: The contribution of research.Buckingham:Open University Press.
  35. Lin, J. W.,Chiu, M. H.(2007).Students' conceptual evolution in electricity-An empirical evaluation of cladistical perspective.Paper presented at the NARST 2007.
  36. Lin, J. W.,Chiu, M. H.(2006).Students' conceptual evolution in electricity-The cladistical perspective.Paper presented at the NARST 2006.
  37. Linn, M. C.,Songer, N. B.(1991).Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands?.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,28,885-918.
  38. Lotem, A.,Nakamura, H.,Zahavi, A.(1995).Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoohost co-evolution.Animal Behaviour,49,185-1209.
  39. Magnusson, S. J.,Boyle, R. A.,Templin, M.(1997).Dynamic science assessment: A new approach for investigating conceptual change.The Journal of the Learning Science,6(1),91-142.
  40. Mann, J.,Smuts, B.(1999).Behavioual development in wild bottlenose dolphin newborns (tursiops sp.).Behaviour,136,529-566.
  41. Méheut, M.,Psillos, D.(2004).Teaching-learning sequences: Aims and tools for science education research.International Journal of Science Education,26(5),515-535.
  42. Nash, J. K.,Fraser, M. W.,Kupper, L. L.(2003).Early development and pilot testing of a problem-solving skills-training program for children.Research on Social Work Practice,13(4),432-450.
  43. Niedderer, H.,Goldberg, F.(1995).Learning pathway and knowledge construction in electric circuit.Paper presented at the European Conference on Research in Science Education,Leeds, UK.:
  44. Osborne, R.,Freyberg, R.(1985).Learning in science: The implications of children's science.Auckland, NZ:Heinemann.
  45. Peterson, R. F.,Treagust, D. F.,Garnett, P. J.(1989).Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade 11 and 12 students' concepts of covalent bonding and structure following a course of instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,26,301-314.
  46. Pfundt, H.,Duit, R.(2007).Bibliography-Students alternative frameworks and science education.Kiel, Germany:University of Kiel Institute for Science Education.
  47. Psillos, D.,Koumaras, P.,Tiberghien, A.(1988).Voltage presented as a primary concept on DC circuits.International Journal of Science Education,10(1),29-43.
  48. Rainson, S.(1995).Paris, France,Universit’e D. Diderot.
  49. Schwedes, H.,Dudeck, W. G.,G. Welford (Eds.),J. Osborne (Eds.),P. Scott (Eds.)(1996).Research in science education in europe.London:Falmer Press.
  50. Schwedes, H.,Schmidt, D.(1992).Conceptual change and theoretical comments.Paper presented at the Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies.
  51. Seidel, T.,Prenzel, M.(2006).Stability of teaching patterns in physics instruction: Finding from a video study.Learning and Instruction,16,228-240.
  52. Sheskin, D.(1997).Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures.Boca Raton, Fla:CRC Press.
  53. Shipstone, D. M.(1984).A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits.European Journal of Science Education,6(2),185-188.
  54. Shipstone, D. M.,R. Driver (Eds.),E. Guesne (Eds.),A. Tiberghien (Eds.)(1985).Children's ideas in science.Milton Keynes:Open University Press.
  55. Toulmin, S.(1972).Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts.Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
  56. Viennot, L.(1996).Raisonner en physique, la part du sens commun.Bruxelles:De Boeck.
  57. White, R.,Gunstone, R.(1992).Probing understanding.London:Falmer Press.
  58. Wiley, E. O.,Siegel-Causey, D.,Brooks, D. R.,Funk, V. A.(1993).The compleat cladist: Primer of phylogenetic procedures.Lawrence:Museum of Natural History.
  59. Woodroofe, M. N.,Hayes, G. M.,Cuzner, M. L.(1989).Fc receptor density, MHC antigen expression and superoxide production are increased in interferon- gamma-treated microglia isolated from adult rat brain.Immunology,68,421-426.
  60. 李賢哲、張蘭友(2001)。國小學童「電池」概念之探究-理論與實證。科學教育學刊,9(3),253-280。
  61. 林靜雯(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市,國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所。
  62. 林靜雯、邱美虹(2008)。以概念演化樹探究學生電學心智模式演化之歷程。中華民國第二十四屆科學教育學術研討會,彰化市:
  63. 林靜雯、邱美虹(2007)。以概念演化觀點分析我國電學教科書之教-學序列。國立編譯館館刊,35(2),3-14。
  64. 林靜雯、邱美虹。探究學生串聯電路認知特徵演化歷程之跨年級研究。教育科學研究期刊
  65. 高淑芬(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所。
  66. 國立編譯館(2003)。國民中學理化第二冊。台北市:國立編譯館。
Times Cited
  1. 林靜雯(2012)。國中學生為什麼改變了心智模式?以電學教─學序列為例。臺北市立教育大學學報:教育類,43(1),59-92。
  2. 林靜雯、吳育倫(2013)。兒童地球形狀概念演化樹之跨年級調查驗證。教育科學研究期刊,58(4),133-163。
  3. 邱美虹、林靜雯(2009)。探究學生串聯電路認知特徵演化歷程之跨年級研究。教育科學研究期刊,54(4),139-170。
  4. (2011)。探究動態表徵結合即時回饋系統對診斷學生簡單暨串聯電路之另有概念的影響。教育與心理研究,34(1),79-107。