摘要
自體齒移植（Autogenious Tooth Transplantation）自1950年代起就開始被討論，在接下來的二十年裹，由於觀念的改變及手術技巧的進步，成功率由54％進步到97％。與人工植體相比較，自體齒移植在形態、生物性功能、與癒合時間上佔了優勢。然而，自體齒移植也受限在捐贈來源上，並不一定能符合所求。另一方面，人工植體在過去四十年的發展中，已經達到了90％以上的成功率，同時在物理性功能、來源上都有其優勢存在；但是，形態及癒合時間上仍不能盡如人意。隨著牙醫科學的進步，這兩種治療方式都持續的改變，本文將把自體齒移植重新思考並與人工植體在生物面、手術面及功能面作一比較，以因應二十一世紀牙醫學的發展。
關鍵字
自然齒移植並列摘要
Autogenous tooth transplantation was reported since 1950’ s. The concepts and surgical techniques were developed in the following 20 years. The success rate was promoted from 54% to 97%. And autogenous tooth transplantation also takes the advantages in morphology, biological function and healing time. However, autogenous tooth transplantations are banded due to limited donor source. On the other hand, dental implants were also developed in the past 40 years and success rates were over 90% in recent study. Dental implants take advantages in physical functions and resources, but in healing time and morphology. With the progress of dental sciences, the points of view of the two treatments were changed continuously. In this presentation, autogenous tooth transplantation would be reconsidered and compared with dental implants in biological, surgical and functional aspects for the current dentistry in 21St century.
延伸閱讀
- 張迺旭（1996）。牙周病學觀點探討牙齒自體移植。中華民國牙周病醫學會雜誌，1(2)，112-112。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000071-199612-201301020005-201301020005-112
- 劉季煒、鄭介原（2019）。自體齒移植的過去與現在－病例報告。中華民國家庭牙醫學雜誌，14(3)，29-34。https://doi.org/10.6566/JFD.201912_14(3).0004
- 張欣如、吳昭南、謝耀東（2009）。下顎覆蓋式義齒－從自然牙到植體。植牙界，(5)，45-48。https://doi.org/10.6373/CYC.200909.0045
- Jahromi, S. K., & Farahmand, M. (2014). Tooth in Lung. Journal of pioneering medical sciences, 4(2), 76-76. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20160812001-201406-201608150020-201608150020-76-76
- 董醒任（2001）。Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Bone Defects Augmented with Bio-Oss。中華民國牙周病醫學會雜誌，6(1)，66-66。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10279962-200103-6-1-66-66-o