A scientific creativity teaching strategy composed with scientific ability and scientific knowledge was developed based on Piaget’s cognitive contradiction theory, Pavio’s binary encoding theory, Parners’s creative problem solving model and Gowin’s Vee-mapping learning strategy. The purpose of this strategy is to excite motivation of scientific creativity. In this study, a quasi-experimental research was adopted to analyze the effects caused by this teaching method. Totally 144 students of grade 5 were selected form two elementary schools. Two classes were chosen from each school. One served as a experimental group and the other served as a control group. The period of experimental treatment took seven weeks. The scientific creativity teaching strategy applied on experimental group and the control group still use the traditional teaching method. The main results in this study were as following: (1) About scientific creativity capabilities experimental group was better than that of the control group. (2) About the deep interview, data gathered from 2 participant teachers and 11 students of the experimental group, teachers claimed that the teaching strategy was useful for improving the scientific creativity learning and the students welcomed the teaching method and respected that can improve their learning achievement in science.
A scientific creativity teaching strategy composed with scientific ability and scientific knowledge was developed based on Piaget’s cognitive contradiction theory, Pavio’s binary encoding theory, Parners’s creative problem solving model and Gowin’s Vee-mapping learning strategy. The purpose of this strategy is to excite motivation of scientific creativity. In this study, a quasi-experimental research was adopted to analyze the effects caused by this teaching method. Totally 144 students of grade 5 were selected form two elementary schools. Two classes were chosen from each school. One served as a experimental group and the other served as a control group. The period of experimental treatment took seven weeks. The scientific creativity teaching strategy applied on experimental group and the control group still use the traditional teaching method. The main results in this study were as following: (1) About scientific creativity capabilities experimental group was better than that of the control group. (2) About the deep interview, data gathered from 2 participant teachers and 11 students of the experimental group, teachers claimed that the teaching strategy was useful for improving the scientific creativity learning and the students welcomed the teaching method and respected that can improve their learning achievement in science.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。