場所依戀在人與環境中已成為調查的重要機制,分為場所依賴及場所認同。研究目的是探討居民與遊客在城市光廊的場所依戀上之差異,利用驗證性因素分析檢驗場所依戀的次階因子。採偶遇抽樣於現地發放440份問卷,有效問卷431份。研究結果:場所依戀的整體模型成立,在場所依賴與場所認同部份可分別以「整體滿意」、「環境互動」、「活動體驗」與「地方歸屬」、「自我表現」作測量。在居民與遊客模型的比較上,場所認同在兩模型的觀察變項是無差異的;場所依賴在遊客及居民模型的觀察變項是有差異的。對遊客來說公共藝術所形塑的城市光廊達到遊客所期待的功能性依附;對於居民而言,城市光廊是藉由公共藝術所包裝的商業空間,居民無法經由此獲得日常生活中的活動需求。
Place attachment has been an important mechanism of investigation for human and environment. It includes two dimensions: place dependence and place identity. The purpose of this research mainly explored the differences of place attachment between residents and tourists on Urban Spotlight. Totally, there were 431 subjects in this study. The results of this study had shown that the overall CFA model of place attachment is significant. Place dependence could be composed by ”overall satisfaction”, ”environmental-interaction” and ”activity experience”. Place identity could be grouped by ”place belonging” and ”self expression”. Furthermore, the study found no difference on the observed items of place identity, but found differences on the observed items of place dependence by comparing residents model with tourists model. For local residents, Urban Spotlight is not a place for necessity of their daily life due to the commercial atmosphere and public arts. On the other hand, tourists consider Urban Spotlight could provide ”place dependence” function for their leisure requirement.