騎樓係我國常見之建築型態之一,其不僅提供行人安全舒適之空間,更在我國都市發展過程中扮演重要之角色。然而,目前騎樓之使用情形時常不合於法律規範,騎樓所有權人與行人間之關係亦處於緊張狀態,造成主管機關管制上之困難與爭議。為此,本文試圖透過分析騎樓相關規範之內容及釐清騎樓於法律上之定位,並探討現行騎樓法制不合理之處。研究結果發現,騎樓性質上應屬私人所有,同時於公法上負有供公眾通行等相關義務,惟此等課予義務之規範有部分實已構成特別犧牲,如未為補償,勢必與憲法保障人民財產權之要求有所未合,本文亦就此提出法制調整之建議,尋求公私法際間之調和。
Arcades are one usual type of architecture in Taiwan. General speaking, they not only offer safe and comfortable spaces for pedestrians, but also play an important role in the process of urban development in Taiwan. However, the present conditions of utilization are not usually fit in legal requirement, and relations between owners of arcades and pedestrians are also in conflicting statuses. As a result, it makes competent authorities have to face difficulties and disputes when they deal with daily regulations of arcades. Therefore, this study tries to analyze the contents of related legal requirements and clarifies the legal statuses of arcades, then explores unreasonable conditions of existing legal system of arcades. The findings figure out arcades should belong to individuals and also afford the obligation of transit and related duties in the area of public law; however, some regulations which impose such duties have really caused special sacrifices. If the government do not compensate for special sacrifices, it must be not satisfied with the requirements of the Constitution. Finally, this study also offers the revisions of legal system in order to pursue the harmonization between private laws and public laws.