探討Google圖書搜尋之反托拉斯法爭議

謝明均

doi:10.6342/NTU.2012.00680

100.24.115.215，Hello！

Close
Search Quick Search Advanced Search Publication Search	Personal Service Member Login Searching History Use Bonus Card SYMSKAN
Browse Browse by University of Graduate Thesis Browse by Pinyin of Graduate Thesis Browse by Conference Proceedings Topic Browse by Conference Proceedings Publisher Browse by Pinyin of Conference Proceedings Browse by eBook Category Browse by eBook Topic Browse by eBook Publisher
Customer Services Authorize Airiti Recommend a Journal

Search Symbol (Half-width)	Description of Search Symbols
Space	"AND" indicates the intertwining of key terms used in a search
Double Quotation Marks ("") ( " " )	Double quotation marks indicate the beginning and end of a phrase, and the search will only include terms that appear in the same order of those within the quotations. Example: "image process" ： " image process "
?	Indicates a variable letter. Entering two ? will indicate two variable letters, and so on. Example: "Appl?", search results will yield apple, apply… e , appl y … ( (often used to English word searches) )
*	Indicates an unlimited number of variable letters to follow, from 1~n. Example: Enter "appl*", search results will yield apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(often used in English word searches) e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( (often used to English word searches) )
AND、OR、NOT	Boolean logic combinations of key words is a skill used to expand or refine search parameters. (1) AND (1) AND: Refines search parameters (2) OR (2) OR: Expands search parameters (3) NOT: Excludes irrelevant parameters

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier （ D igital O bject I dentifier ） ,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.

Using DOI as a persistent link

To create a persistent link, add「http://dx.doi.org/」「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」 before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is 10.5297/ser.1201.002 , you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.

Cite a document with DOI

When citing references, you should also cite the DOI if the article has one. If your citation guideline does not include DOIs, you may cite the DOI link.

DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration （ doi.airiti.com ）。

Data Source

College of Social Sciences > Graduate Institute of National Development
Social Sciences > Politics

Bibliography Management Tool

Related Links

Report an Issue

Purchase Single Articles

Download PDF

探討Google圖書搜尋之反托拉斯法爭議

A Study of the Google Book Search Antitrust Controversy

謝明均 , Masters　　Advisor：劉靜怡教授　　

繁體中文 DOI： 10.6342/NTU.2012.00680

Google圖書搜尋；水平協議；聯合訂價；孤兒著作；事實上排他性權利；濫用獨占地位；前後比較方式；限制較少之替代手段； Google Book Search ； horizontal agreement ； price fixing ； orphan works ； de facto exclusive rights ； monopolize ； but-for baseline ； less restrictive alternative

Abstract │ Reference (120) │ Altmetrics

Abstract 〈TOP〉

Parallel Abstract 〈TOP〉

From 2004, Google has been undertaking digital library project. Google is trying to build a database including millions of digital books. But the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers sued Google in 2005, because copyright owners didn’t license Google to scan and online display their works. After negotiations, the parties reached a settlement agreement in 2008. If the settlement agreement had been approved by court, people could online access to millions of books, especially to Orphan Works, through Google book search (GBS). The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and some objectors, however, concern that the settlement agreement raises some antitrust issues, resulting in some anti-competitive effects and harm consumer welfares. The court rejected the settlement agreement in March. 22, 2011. In chapter II, in order to make sure the antitrust issues relating to the settlement agreement, this article analyzes the structure and characteristics of settlement agreement, and summaries the Statement of Interest and the court’s ruling.In chapter III, this article discusses the first issue regarding horizontal price fixing among copyright owners. Chapter III shows that the terms wouldn’t restrict price competition, and could reduce effectively the quantity of orphan works. Under the rule of reason, these terms are reasonable ancillary restraints.

In chapter IV, this article discusses the second issue regarding de facto exclusivity over orphan works that the settlement agreement would grant Google. Chapter IV shows that orphan works couldn’t define as the relevant product market, consumers could find some reasonable substitutions. Even if define the orphan works as the relevant product market. Potential competitors who want to enter this market face a legal restriction, so there is a barrier to entry in this market. Google would have monopoly power. Current copyright law doesn’t permit the fiduciary to license orphan works to potential competitors. The settlement agreement would have the effect of unilateral refusals to deal, and would grant Google de facto exclusive rights over orphan works. But this article shows that it is a reasonable restraint. There isn’t a less restrictive alternative for achieving the same goal. So the settlement agreement wouldn’t violate Sherman Act §2. Finally, this article discusses the third issue regarding a tying arrangement between Google Web Search engine and Google Book Search. This article shows that there isn’t a tying arrangement because Google couldn’t coerce users into buying any products of GBS.

Reference ( 120 ) 〈TOP〉

3、賴源河等合著（2005），公平交易法新論，台北：元照。
連結：
4、賴文智（2003），數位著作權法，台北：益思科技法律事務所。
連結：
5、謝銘洋（2007），智慧財產權法，台北：經濟部智慧財產局。
連結：
2、賴韻羽（2007），孤兒著作利用困境與解決機制之研究，台灣大學法律研究所碩士論文。
連結：
5、Gellhorn, Ernest, ET AL.( 2004). Antitrust Law And Economics(5th ed.). St. Paul:Thomson/West.
連結：

Altmetrics

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

When an article is available to download, a notice will be sent to your mailbox address.

E-mail ：