透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.226.187.24
  • 學位論文

248農學市集的食物網絡與運作模式分析

An inquiry into the food web and operational model of 248 farmers' market

指導教授 : 蔡厚男

摘要


全球食物供應不穩定的現象,使許多國家開始重視在地糧食系統,以保障食物的生產及供應安全,台灣過度依賴進口農產品及對小農不利的農業政策,促使地方農業運動逐漸在各地萌芽發展,而農夫市集直接串連產銷關係,在短時間內受到公私部門的重視,陸續發起市集運動,以解決小農生計的問題。本研究以台北248農學市集作為個案研究對象,透過參與式觀察及訪談了解248農學市集的發展與推廣方式如何協助小農解決問題。 研究結果發現248農學市集是由一群具有相同的理念的生產者所建立而成的市集,市集作為推廣在地小農理念、價值觀及農產品的平台,讓生產者與消費者面對面溝通,提供消費者無毒、安全的食物外,並教育消費者對食物多元的了解,一方面以消費支持友善的種植方式間接友善環境,並支持生產者的理念與價值觀,同時也拉近都市與鄉村的連結,加深人、食物與土地之間的關係,農夫市集的發展協助農友拓展多元的合作機會,改變生產者的角色,建立比有機認證更有保障的信任關係。

並列摘要


The unstable global phenomenons begun to attach global food system, we need to protect the safety of food production and supply. Taiwan excessive dependence on imports of agricultural products and disadvantage agricultural policy to small farmers, both to promote local agriculture movement has gradually blossomed and developed in various places.Farmers’ marke direct serial production and sales parts, be attention to both public and private sectors in a short time. Initiated market movement successively to solve the problem of small farmers’ livelihoods. I select 248 Farmers’ Market to be this case study, through participant observation and interviews to understand the development and how to solve small farmers’ problems. The results showed that the farmers in 248 Farmers’ Market is grouped and established by the same idea, It’s be a place to promotion local small-scale ideas, agricultural products and values, so that the producers and consumers communicate face to face. On the one hand, 248 Farmers’ Market not only to provide non-toxic, freash and safe food but also to educate consumers the knowledge of food, on the other hand, consumers direct support the farmer’s cultivation methods, indirectly support the environment and support producers of beliefs and values, as well as closer links to urban and rural areas, deepen the relationship in people, food and land. We can actually know that farmers’ market can help farmers to expand the diverse of cooperation chance, change the role of producers and create more trust relationships than the organic certification.

參考文獻


周桂田,(2003),從「全球化風險」到「全球在地化風險」之研究進路:對貝克理論的批判思考,台灣社會學刊,2003/12,31,pp.153--188。
謝順景,(1989),有機農業研討會專集:歐美國家之有機農業,台中區農業改良場特刊,16,pp.31-40。
內政部地政司,(2010),都市地價指數,34,臺北市:五南文化廣場。
白仁德、吳貞儀,(2010),永續性農業運動—社區支持型農業與土地倫理的對話,城市學學刊,1(2),pp.1-35。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花,(2005),質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析,身心障礙研究,3(2):pp.122-136。

被引用紀錄


邱俊毓(2016)。社會企業資源困境與解決之道〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00400
黃珩婷(2014)。哪一種自然才算數?新店溪永和段水岸農業的興衰〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.02928
劉育珊(2011)。出麥或出賣?-大雅小麥產業發展歷程〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.03198
賴鳳霙(2011)。農民市集的形塑與發展:以臺中合樸農學市集為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315240986
林鳳儀(2014)。農學市集的經營運作─248農學市集個案研究〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0412201512004812

延伸閱讀