透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.128.199.210
  • 學位論文

我國低碳評核指標之研議

Deliberations of Taiwan's low-carbon Assess Index

指導教授 : 鄭福田

摘要


為了達到低碳社會,目前國內很多縣市正推動節能減碳。但因為缺少統一的評定指標,而無法判定是達到低碳城市。因此,本研究目的係提出低碳評核指標,作為評定是否符合低碳社會之參考。 藉利用低碳評核指標進行評估,除可了解評估對象之減碳努力程度外,也可作為政策調整之參考。目前國際間永續指標發展普遍採用「壓力-現狀-因應」(Pressure-State-Response, PSR)系統,作為設計依據,但因國內尚無明確減量目標及責任,故本研究僅考慮「壓力-現狀」兩項,以了解目前現況。本研究參考國外低碳城市發展案例,及國際國內相關低碳指標後,提出八大低碳評估面向:「再生能源」、「節約能源」、「綠色運輸」、「低碳建築」、「環境綠化」、「資源循環」、「低碳生活」及「低碳校園」,提出相對之低碳評核指標,作為計算各面向及整體表現。並針對政府減碳目標,定義年人均排碳量低於2.44公噸CO2e/人年,即符合低「低碳」之定義。 除實質之環境效益外,低碳評核指標可讓民眾及非政府組織了解政府減碳政策,對政府施壓,以便早日達到低碳社會之目標。

並列摘要


In order to achieve a low-carbon society, many domestic counties are to promote energy conservation and carbon reduction. Because of the lack of a unified assessment index, we can not compare which county is achieving a low-carbon society. So this research is to assess the proposed low-carbon index, as a reference for assessing whether a low-carbon society. Use index to assess low-carbon action, it can show us how far we away the low-carbon target. So we can adjust our policy. At present the development of international sustainability indexes commonly used "Pressure - Status - Response "(PSR) system as a basis. However, we do not have clear targets and responsibilities. So this research only considers the "Pressure - Status" in order to understand the current status. Refer to the foreign case of low-carbon city and related index. This research proposed eight low-carbon directions: Renewable Energy, Energy conservation, Green Transport, Low-carbon building, Green Environment, Resource recycling, Low-carbon life and Low-carbon Campus. It also propose the low-carbon assess index, for calculate the performance. According to the Government's carbon reduction targets, this research proposed that lower than 2.44 mt CO2e /capita -year as a "low carbon". In addition to substance of environmental benefits, the low-carbon assessment index allows the public and non-governmental organizations to understand the Government's reduction policy. It also can pressure on the Government to achieve a low carbon society as soon as possible.

參考文獻


8. 臺北縣政府環境保護局,2009,臺北縣低碳社區標章認證制度作業要點。
2. Kristie Wilson, First 100% Sustainable Island in the Caribbean, http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/02/03/first-100-sustainable-island-in-the-caribbean/, 2009。
3. Germanwatch, 2010, The Climate Change Performace Index Background and Methodolgy.
4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, ClimateChange2007: Mitigation of ClimateChange.
5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

被引用紀錄


楊嘉輝(2012)。以AHP法評估國民中小學推動綠色低碳校園應用順序之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2012.00037
陳怡玲(2014)。低碳島嶼與遊憩活動聯合品牌策略之研究〔碩士論文,國立高雄餐旅大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6825/NKUHT.2014.00023
陳佑瑄(2013)。整合土地使用規劃概念之低碳城市指標研究 -以臺北市為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0109201322042600
吳欣祐(2013)。大眾運輸導向發展下低碳城市規劃設計策略之研究 -以新北市板橋站為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2811201315134800
林薏萍(2013)。不同道路分隔島植栽配置對都市道路溫度之影響-以台中市台灣大道為例〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2712201314043491

延伸閱讀