拍賣頻率與直接購買

Selling Frequency and Buy-it-now Auction on eBay

劉容銓(Jung-Chuan Liu)

指導教授 ： 黃景沂

國立臺灣大學/社會科學院/經濟學研究所/碩士(2017年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201704029

摘要

本文主要研究賣家拍賣頻率對於交易模式及訂價之影響，在Chen et al.( 2013)之理論架構下，推論其與風險態度之關係。本文確認了其對交易模式選擇及訂價之影響，亦排除了其導因於競爭激烈程度及其影響交易模式與訂價選擇之可能，得到了「拍賣次數較頻繁之賣家較有可能吸引風險趨避之買家」之推論。本文亦以Chen et al. (2013)之理論為基礎，補足了Anderson et al. (2007)的研究結論。此外，本篇也根據Chen et al.(2012)的計量方法研究不同交易模式下成交率和成交價的變化，得到了相似的結果。

關鍵字

拍賣頻率 ； 直接購買

並列摘要

This paper empirically studies the impact of the seller's auction frequency on the auction format and pricing, and discuss its relationship with the risk attitude based on the theory of Chen et al. (2013). This paper also confirms its impact on the auction format and pricing, and also excludes the effect of competition between buyers. We have the conclusion that sellers with more frequent auctions are more likely to attract more risk-adverse buyers. This paper also complements the conclusion of Anderson et al. (2007) based on the theory of Chen et al. (2013). In addition, we estimate change in sales rate and transaction price between different format and has the result, which is similar to Chen et al.(2012).

並列關鍵字

selling frequency ； buy-it-now ； auction

參考文獻

2. Bajari, P. and A. Hortacsu, (2003), “Winner's curse, reserve prices and endogenous entry: empirical insights from eBay auctions,” Rand Journal of Economics, 34, 329–55.

3. Budish E.-B.and L.-N. Takeyama, (2001), “Buy prices in online auctions: irrationality on the internet?” Economics Letters, 72, 325–333

4. Barrymore N. and Y. Raviv, (2009), “The Effect of Different Reserve Prices on Auction Outcomes.” Robert Day School of Economics and Finance Research Paper No. 2009-13

5. Chen K.-P., S.-H. Ho, C.-H. Liu, C.-M. Wang, (2017), “The Optimal Listing Strategies in Online Auctions,” International Economic Review, 58(2), 421-437.

6. Chen J.-R., K.-P. Chen, C.-F. Chou, C.-I Huang,(2013), “A Dynamic Model of Auctions with Buy-it-now: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 61, 393-429