地方居民如何解讀鄰避設施的環境風險：一個對多元暴露社區的田野研究

簡子翔

doi:10.6342/NTU.2014.02444

3.232.96.22，Hello！

Close
Search Quick Search Advanced Search Publication Search	Personal Service Member Login Searching History Use Bonus Card SYMSKAN
Browse Browse by University of Graduate Thesis Browse by Pinyin of Graduate Thesis Browse by Conference Proceedings Topic Browse by Conference Proceedings Publisher Browse by Pinyin of Conference Proceedings Browse by eBook Category Browse by eBook Topic Browse by eBook Publisher
Customer Services Authorize Airiti Recommend a Journal

Search Symbol (Half-width)	Description of Search Symbols
Space	"AND" indicates the intertwining of key terms used in a search
Double Quotation Marks ("") ( " " )	Double quotation marks indicate the beginning and end of a phrase, and the search will only include terms that appear in the same order of those within the quotations. Example: "image process" ： " image process "
?	Indicates a variable letter. Entering two ? will indicate two variable letters, and so on. Example: "Appl?", search results will yield apple, apply… e , appl y … ( (often used to English word searches) )
*	Indicates an unlimited number of variable letters to follow, from 1~n. Example: Enter "appl*", search results will yield apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(often used in English word searches) e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( (often used to English word searches) )
AND、OR、NOT	Boolean logic combinations of key words is a skill used to expand or refine search parameters. (1) AND (1) AND: Refines search parameters (2) OR (2) OR: Expands search parameters (3) NOT: Excludes irrelevant parameters

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier （ D igital O bject I dentifier ） ,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.

Using DOI as a persistent link

To create a persistent link, add「http://dx.doi.org/」「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」 before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is 10.5297/ser.1201.002 , you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.

Cite a document with DOI

When citing references, you should also cite the DOI if the article has one. If your citation guideline does not include DOIs, you may cite the DOI link.

DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration （ doi.airiti.com ）。

Data Source

Health & Medical Care > Health Promotion & Hygiene
College of Public Health > Graduate Institute of Health Policy and Management
Social Sciences > Politics

Bibliography Management Tool

Related Links

Report an Issue

Purchase Single Articles

Download PDF

地方居民如何解讀鄰避設施的環境風險：一個對多元暴露社區的田野研究

How Local Residents Interpret the Environmental Risks of NIMBY Facilities: A Field Study in A Community with Multiple Exposures

簡子翔 , Masters　　Advisor：丁志音　　

繁體中文 DOI： 10.6342/NTU.2014.02444

多元暴露；鄰避設施；風險感知；常民觀點；因應策略；質性研究； multiple exposures ； NIMBY facilities ； risk perceptions ； lay perspective ； coping strategies ； qualitative research

Abstract │ Reference (81) │ Altmetrics

Abstract 〈TOP〉

Parallel Abstract 〈TOP〉

Background and objectives：While risk perceptions and behavioral responses to hazards released from a specific NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) facility have drawn extensive attention, which have been hardly explored in settings where multiple LIMBY facilities exist. This study examined how local residents interpreted potential environmental risks, grasped possible adverse effects on individual health and community ecology, and behaviorally adjusted to regularly and non-regularly discharged exposures.

Methods：This study followed a community-based field work design. The study community is located in the Northern part of Keelung County in Taiwan, where a thermal power plant, a high voltage tower, a fertilizer chemical plant and a viaduct have been consecutively built up since 1960s; each contributed to economic development but also unavoidably caused environmental deterioration and health detriment. Both in-depth interviewing and participant observation were employed to collect data for analysis. By means of maximum variation sampling, 21 residents distinctive in their age, gender, education and occupation were selected and interviewed during July 2013 to November 2013. The sound-recording interview data were transcribed into verbatim draft and main themes embedded in the participants' narratives and conversations were extracted and triangulated.

Results：Major findings of this study included: (1) Residents’ perceptions of risk mostly came from three dimensions of exposures: sensory observability, severity, and exposure scope. Age cohort or generational differences in perceptions were found due mainly to the contribution of these facilities to their own economic advantage, (2) Seasonal fluctuations and meteorological conditions may affect residents’ perceptions. Particularly, social economic status and previous experiences would influence one’s possibility and degree of exposures, (3) In a long run, residents considered the long-term exposure caused multiple burdens of negative health outcomes, undesirable quality of life, and irreversible environmental and ecology devastation. Even worse, the interactive effects of those diversified exposures were considered to qualitatively and quantitatively amplify the sum of their separate effects, (4) Residents coped with multiple adverse exposures through pluralistic strategies. In addition to developing positive psychological mechanisms to buffer mentally distressed reactions, they also used protective devices or practices to eliminate possible exposure contacts. Moreover, they further adopted strategies to enhance their own physical and physiological strength to fight against prolonged negative health effects.

Conclusion：The socio-psychological and behavioral effects of environmental exposures from multiple NIMBY facilities on local residents were intertwined and multi-dimensional, and closely associated with their life experiences. From the perspective of lay knowledge and lay epidemiology, local residents’ short-term reactions and long-term responses to single and multiple NIMBY facilities should be continuously and systematically observed and analyzed to inform environmental health regulations and policy formulations, and provide conceptual and theoretical implications for future research.

Reference ( 81 ) 〈TOP〉

李永展 (1999) 。鄰避設施設置之研究─環境正義觀點。取自國立政治大學，地政學系網址http://nccuir.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/4881/1/882415H004025.pdf
連結：
周桂田 (2003) 。從「全球化風險」到「全球在地化風險」之研究進路：對貝克理論的批判思考。臺灣社會學刊，(31) 。153-188。
連結：
林宜平 (2006) 。女人與水　由性別觀點分析 RCA 健康相關研究。女學學誌，(21) ，185-211。
連結：
林宜平、吳亭亭、黎雅如、周桂田、鄭尊仁 (2010) 。台灣成年民眾對奈米產品與科技的公眾感知。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，29(5) ，431-439。
連結：
林宜平、林彥君、詹長權、鄭尊仁 (2010) 。台灣民眾對不同來源電磁場感知的利益、風險與管制信任。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，29(2) ，87-96。
連結：

Altmetrics

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

When an article is available to download, a notice will be sent to your mailbox address.

E-mail ：