透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.178.240
  • 學位論文

競選策略動態模型:以2008年總統選舉候選人馬英九為例

Dynamic Model for Campaign Strategy: The Case of Candidate Ying-jeou Ma in Taiwan’s 2008 Presidential Election

指導教授 : 洪永泰
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究整合了政治學、傳播學、行銷理論及組織人際網絡觀點,建構一個理論性的「動態模型」,描述由候選人團隊組成的「競選系統」,在所處的戰場環境中,如何透過戰情分析、戰略擬定、空中轟炸與地面作戰的戰術執行、戰鬥攻擊等,與競爭者的策略一起對選民發生作用,這些作用經由回饋效應,重塑戰場環境,讓候選人擬定新策略,不斷循環,直到投票日當天分出勝負爲止。 筆者以2008年總統選舉進行時的「觀察法」爲經、選舉結束後的「訪談法」爲緯,經由質化研究法,證明動態模型確實可解釋競選策略的制定過程;另一方面,筆者以選舉民意調查的「個體資料」爲主、村里開票紀錄的「總體資料」爲輔,透過統計方法,分別驗證空中轟炸與地面作戰的策略效果。 質化與量化並重的研究發現,「青春鐵馬」與「LONG STAY」對馬英九的候選人定位,確實產生部分效果,但這些效果以維持爲主,並未開拓新票源;「一中市場」或「返聯公投」降低馬英九被抹紅的風險,化解了競爭者的攻擊力道;「綠卡事件」與「藍委踢館事件」衝擊不大,只是短期效應,競爭者只達到鞏固原本選票的目的。整體來說,馬英九從2007年7月至2008年2月,空中轟炸戰術的淨策略效果,大約是7.0個百分點。 在地面作戰方面,馬英九的組織動員除了鞏固傳統國民黨地盤,還有效地突破民進黨的封鎖,在藍綠競爭激烈區、淺綠區都能領先競爭者,是致勝關鍵。

並列摘要


This research tries to construct a “Dynamic Model” for campaign strategy by integrating theories in political science, communications, marketing, and social networking. Candidates in intense elections have to campaign by analyzing battleground situation, formulating strategies, executing air bombardment and ground war tactics, launch combat in order to impact their voters. These attempts affect the voters, restructure the battleground, and in return, help the candidates to reformulate new strategies. These campaigns strategies follow an ongoing circular motion that only comes to a halt on the election day. The study employed qualitative research methods to show that the “Dynamic Model” can indeed formulate the process of campaign decisions during the 2008 presidential election in Taiwan. The research is based on interviews with campaign managers and staffs of candidate Ma and numerous first-hand observations as a major newspaper correspondent to the election. With statistical data collected from election polls and data of election results, the study tries to exemplify the corresponding effects from the air bombardment and ground war tactics. The analysis shows that both “Young Cycling” and “Long Stay” campaigns only sustained voters’ support but failed to expand significantly. Strategies made in “One-China Market” and “Return to the U.N. Referendum” were effective in confusing DPP’s strategies and keeping Ma from discredit. Incidents in “The Green Card Controversy” and “Blue Legislators Intrusion into Rival Campaign Office” were proved to have only short-term impact and did not crumble Ma’s support. In brief, from July 2007 to February 2008, net campaign effect of Ma’s air bombardment tactics were estimated to have a 7 percentage point gain. In terms of ground war tactics, Ma’s strategies not only effectively secure supports from pan-blue areas but also significantly ambush pan-green territories. Ma’s final lead in light-green and break-even areas turns out to be the key factor of his landslide victory.

參考文獻


王業立,2001,《比較選舉制度》,台北:五南。
張佑宗、趙珮如,2006,「社會脈絡、個人網絡與臺灣2004年立法委員選舉選民的投票抉擇,《臺灣民主季刊》,第三卷,第二期,頁1-38。
劉義周,2005,「典型的回顧型投票─2005年三合一選舉結果的解析」,《臺灣民主季刊》,第二卷,第四期,頁147-153。
鄭夙芬、陳陸輝、劉嘉薇,2005,「2004年總統選舉中的候選人因素」,《臺灣民主季刊》,第二卷,第二期,頁31-70。
王金壽,1997,「國民黨候選人買票機器的建立與運作:一九九三年風芒縣長選舉的個案研究」,《台灣政治學刊》,第二期,頁3-62。

被引用紀錄


黃羿菁(2007)。Logit模型預測2006年高雄市長選舉〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2007.00269
柯達昱(2009)。三種投票日當天選舉預測方法之績效評估〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.10463

延伸閱讀