訊息密度對逐步口譯筆記之影響

貝美達

doi:10.6342/NTU202102803

18.232.179.5，Hello！

Close
Search Quick Search Advanced Search Publication Search	Personal Service Member Login Searching History Use Bonus Card SYMSKAN
Browse Browse by University of Graduate Thesis Browse by Pinyin of Graduate Thesis Browse by Conference Proceedings Topic Browse by Conference Proceedings Publisher Browse by Pinyin of Conference Proceedings Browse by eBook Category Browse by eBook Topic Browse by eBook Publisher
Customer Services Authorize Airiti Recommend a Journal

Search Symbol (Half-width)	Description of Search Symbols
Space	"AND" indicates the intertwining of key terms used in a search
Double Quotation Marks ("") ( " " )	Double quotation marks indicate the beginning and end of a phrase, and the search will only include terms that appear in the same order of those within the quotations. Example: "image process" ： " image process "
?	Indicates a variable letter. Entering two ? will indicate two variable letters, and so on. Example: "Appl?", search results will yield apple, apply… e , appl y … ( (often used to English word searches) )
*	Indicates an unlimited number of variable letters to follow, from 1~n. Example: Enter "appl*", search results will yield apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(often used in English word searches) e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( (often used to English word searches) )
AND、OR、NOT	Boolean logic combinations of key words is a skill used to expand or refine search parameters. (1) AND (1) AND: Refines search parameters (2) OR (2) OR: Expands search parameters (3) NOT: Excludes irrelevant parameters

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier （ D igital O bject I dentifier ） ,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.

Using DOI as a persistent link

To create a persistent link, add「http://dx.doi.org/」「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」 before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is 10.5297/ser.1201.002 , you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.

Cite a document with DOI

When citing references, you should also cite the DOI if the article has one. If your citation guideline does not include DOIs, you may cite the DOI link.

DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration （ doi.airiti.com ）。

Data Source

Humanities > Linguistics
College of Liberal Arts > Graduate Program in Translation and Interpretation

Bibliography Management Tool

Related Links

Report an Issue

Purchase Single Articles

Download PDF

訊息密度對逐步口譯筆記之影響

The Impact of Information Density on Consecutive Interpreting Note-Taking

貝美達 , Masters　　Advisor：吳茵茵　　

英文 DOI： 10.6342/NTU202102803

訊息密度；逐步口譯；筆記；語言方向；口譯員訓練程度； information density ； consecutive interpreting ； note-taking ； directionality ； interpreter training

Abstract │ Reference (76) │ Altmetrics

Abstract 〈TOP〉

Parallel Abstract 〈TOP〉

This research investigated the impact of information density on consecutive interpreting (CI) note-taking output for both interpreting directions across three levels of training. To this end, eleven participants, all of whom were enrolled in translation and interpretation graduate programs in northern Taiwan at the time, were recruited to take part in a CI experiment and retrospective interview. Of the participants, four were in year one of their studies (Y1), four were in year two (Y2), and three were in year three (Y3); all had a language combination of Chinese A, English B. The CI experiment required participants to interpret four speeches in total, two from Chinese into English and two from English into Chinese. Each speech was divided into two segments and manipulated so that the information density of one segment was relatively higher to the other segment and audio recorded by native speakers. After each participant completed all four interpreting tasks, they participated in a retrospective interview. In total 44 sets of notes were collected for analysis alongside data from the retrospective interviews. 
	
The collected CI notes from each interpreter were compared across information densities, interpreting direction, and levels of training for language, form, and quantity. Analysis revealed that directionality and information density had an impact on note-taking language. Regardless of level information density setting, direction of interpretation, or training level, participants consistently produced more B language notes than A language notes; furthermore, the generally preferred B language was employed less when listening to A input, and participants produced the least B language when listening to high density A language. In terms of form, participants produced relatively fewer language notes and more symbol notes when noting high density input. Chinese-specific forms (simplified, traditional, zhuyin, pinyin), however, were not noticeably affected by density or directionality. Furthermore, year one (Y1) interpreters produced more language-based notes and far fewer horizontal lines than the other two cohorts. Note quantity increased per proposition when noting low density input and was seen to steadily increase with each year of training. Finally, student interpreters identified three strategies they used to cope with high density input: prioritizing writing/retrieval speed, shifting cognitive resources, and using more source language. Based on these findings, this study concludes information density does have an impact on some aspects of CI note-taking and that these impacts can vary depending on interpreting direction and training of the interpreter.

Reference ( 76 ) 〈TOP〉

Abuín González, M. (2012). The language of consecutive interpreters’ notes: Differences across levels of expertise. Interpreting, 14(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.14.1.03abu
Ahrens, B. (2015). Note-taking. In F. Pöchhacker, N. Grbić, P. Mead, R. Setton (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies (pp. 283-286). Routledge.
Alexieva, B. (1993). On teaching note-taking in consecutive interpreting. In C. Dollerup A. Loddegaard (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpreting 2: Insights, aims, visions (pp. 199-206). John Benjamins.
Alexieva, B. (1994). On teaching note-taking in consecutive interpreting. In C. Dollerup A. Lindegaard (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpreting 2: Insights, aims, visions (pp. 199-206). John Benjamins.
Alexieva, B. (1999). Understanding the source language text in simultaneous interpreting. The Interpreters' Newsletter, 9, 45-59. http://hdl.handle.net/10077/2212

Altmetrics

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

When an article is available to download, a notice will be sent to your mailbox address.

E-mail ：