建構與驗證「藥學系六年制學生專業能力自我效能量表」

洪佳安

doi:10.6342/NTU201701193

3.235.228.219，Hello！

Close
Search Quick Search Advanced Search Publication Search	Personal Service Member Login Searching History Use Bonus Card SYMSKAN
Browse Browse by University of Graduate Thesis Browse by Pinyin of Graduate Thesis Browse by Conference Proceedings Topic Browse by Conference Proceedings Publisher Browse by Pinyin of Conference Proceedings Browse by eBook Category Browse by eBook Topic Browse by eBook Publisher
Customer Services Authorize Airiti Recommend a Journal

Search Symbol (Half-width)	Description of Search Symbols
Space	"AND" indicates the intertwining of key terms used in a search
Double Quotation Marks ("") ( " " )	Double quotation marks indicate the beginning and end of a phrase, and the search will only include terms that appear in the same order of those within the quotations. Example: "image process" ： " image process "
?	Indicates a variable letter. Entering two ? will indicate two variable letters, and so on. Example: "Appl?", search results will yield apple, apply… e , appl y … ( (often used to English word searches) )
*	Indicates an unlimited number of variable letters to follow, from 1~n. Example: Enter "appl*", search results will yield apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(often used in English word searches) e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( (often used to English word searches) )
AND、OR、NOT	Boolean logic combinations of key words is a skill used to expand or refine search parameters. (1) AND (1) AND: Refines search parameters (2) OR (2) OR: Expands search parameters (3) NOT: Excludes irrelevant parameters

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier （ D igital O bject I dentifier ） ,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.

Using DOI as a persistent link

To create a persistent link, add「http://dx.doi.org/」「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」 before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is 10.5297/ser.1201.002 , you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.

Cite a document with DOI

When citing references, you should also cite the DOI if the article has one. If your citation guideline does not include DOIs, you may cite the DOI link.

DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration （ doi.airiti.com ）。

Data Source

Health & Medical Care > Pharmacology
College of Medicine > Graduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy

Bibliography Management Tool

Related Links

Report an Issue

Search for full text in Holdings

Full-Text will be available on 2022/08/28 Authorization notice of subscription

建構與驗證「藥學系六年制學生專業能力自我效能量表」

Development and Validation of A Scale to Measure Pharm.D. Students' Self-Efficacy in Professional Competencies

洪佳安 , Masters　　Advisor：林淑文　　Co-advisor ：蕭斐元

繁體中文 DOI： 10.6342/NTU201701193

藥學專業能力；藥學教育；自我效能；量表建構； Pharmacy professional competency ； pharmacy education ； self-efficacy ； scale development

Abstract │ Reference (112) │ Altmetrics

Abstract 〈TOP〉

研究背景：
    自我效能（self-efficacy）是增進學習動機、產生學習行為的一大重要因素，確保學生在專業能力上具備良好的自我效能，不但能協助學生逐漸邁向成功，亦能做為教師由學生主觀認知的角度出發，評估教學成效的有力證據。臺大藥學系近年來已順利轉型為六年制Pharm.D.（Doctor of Pharmacy）學位，在此特別的時間點，建構一個量表來測量並觀察藥學生的專業能力自我效能的變化，將成為未來教育評估的重要參考依據之一。

研究目的：
    本研究期望建構一個藥學專業能力自我效能量表，並進行信效度的驗證，同時對臺大藥學系高年級學生進行橫斷性的調查，以比較不同學制及年級之間自我效能的差異。

研究方法：
    本研究透過完整的文獻回顧、焦點團體會議、內容效度審核、認知訪談預試等流程建構量表之構面與問項，並實際對臺大藥學系高年級學生進行施測，再經項目分析、分構面探索性因素分析、效標關聯效度及內部一致性檢定來驗證量表的信效度。最後以Student’s t-test、Mann-Whitney U-test及Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance ranks進行不同學制及年級之間自我效能的差異檢定。

研究結果：
    本研究依照文獻回顧、焦點團體等資料，建構出包含五個構面（人際關係及溝通技巧、專業素養、藥事照護、醫療體制下之臨床工作、從工作中學習與成長）之「藥學系六年制學生專業能力自我效能量表」，共119個問項，每個問項的I-CVI均大於0.83，整份量表的S-CVI/Ave為0.98。施測後共回收了81份有效問卷（有效回收率94%），經項目分析及分構面探索性因素分析後，保留了53個問項，量表整體的內部一致性係數為0.969（各構面均達0.9以上）。在效標關聯效度上，近兩年學習成績較高者比起較低者，在專業素養、藥事照護以及量表整體得分上有顯著較高的自我效能（p < 0.05）。
    而在橫斷性調查中顯示，六年制之六年級學生的自我效能在總分或各構面得分上，都比四年制之四年級、六年制之四年級與五年級三組學生還高，且在專業素養、藥事照護、醫療體制下之臨床工作、從工作中學習與成長等構面上，與六年制之四年級學生達到顯著差異（p < 0.05），另在藥事照護構面上，亦顯著地高於四年制之四年級學生（p < 0.05）。

結論：
    本研究建構之自我效能量表具有良好的信、效度，未來之藥學教育研究者可以利用此量表來評估、觀察、監測學生的專業能力自我效能，收集來自學生端主觀的能力評估依據，做為教學成效的參考資料。

Parallel Abstract 〈TOP〉

Background: 
    Self-efficacy is crucial for students to be motivated and successfully strive for active learning. Students with high self-efficacy in professional competencies may not only reassure themselves to attain achievement, but their subjective assessments are also powerful evidence to evaluate effectiveness of teaching. The Bachelor of Science (B.S.) program in National Taiwan University School of Pharmacy has transited to 6-year Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm.D.) program recently. It is crucial to develop a scale to measure pharmacy students’ self-efficacy of professional competencies as an evidence for an evaluation of educational outcomes.

Objectives: 
    We aimed to develop a scale to measure pharmacy students’ self-efficacy of professional competencies and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Besides, we also aimed to explore the differences of students’ self-efficacy of 2 programs and years by a cross-sectional survey.

Methods: 
    The scale was developed based on literature review, interview of focus group, experts review and pretest with cognitive interview. We collected surveys from senior pharmacy students. We performed item analysis, stratified exploratory factor analysis, criterion-related validity and Cronbach’s alpha to validate the scale. Lastly, we compared the differences of self-efficacy between programs and years by Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance ranks.

Results: 
    Five constructs (interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, pharmaceutical care, system based practice, practice based learning and improvement) and 119 items had been established based on literature review and experts’ opinions. The content validity index showed satisfying results (All I-CVIs higher than 0.83, S-CVI/Ave 0.98). A total of 81 students (94% response rate) responded the survey. After item analysis and stratified exploratory factor analysis, 53 items had been retained. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.969 for the whole scale (All constructs higher than 0.9). For criterion-related validity, students group of superior academic performance showed significantly higher self-efficacy than students group of inferior academic performance in the constructs of professionalism, pharmaceutical care and the total score (p < 0.05).
    In the cross-sectional survey, 6th year Pharm.D. students showed highest self-efficacy in all five constructs and the total score compared to the rest of students. Specifically, the former demonstrated significantly higher self-efficacy than 4th year Pharm.D. students in the constructs of professionalism, pharmaceutical care, system based practice, practice based learning and improvement (p < 0.05). In addition, 6th year Pharm.D. students also showed significantly higher self-efficacy than 4th year B.S. students in the construct of pharmaceutical care (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: 
    The newly developed scale demonstrated good reliability and validity. It may serve as a psychometrically sound tool for pharmacy educators and researchers to measure pharmacy students’ self-efficacy in professional competencies, and hence an evidence for educational outcomes evaluation.

Reference ( 112 ) 〈TOP〉

2. 顧記華、沈麗娟、陳基旺、何蘊芳、林慧玲. 臺灣六年制藥學教育的創建. 台灣醫學. 2016;20(1):27-32.
連結：
3. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會. 醫院評鑑基準及評量項目-急性一般病床100床以上. Available at: http://www.jct.org.tw/FrontStage/index.aspx. Accessed 3/16, 2017.
連結：
4. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會. 醫院評鑑基準及評量項目-急性一般病床99床以下. Available at: http://www.jct.org.tw/FrontStage/index.aspx. Accessed 3/16, 2017.
連結：
7. 林慧玲、許光陽、闕壯卿、李安榮、簡伯武、高雅慧、蔡義弘、張建雄、魏道昌、陳基旺. 2005 年台灣藥學教育白皮書. 醫學教育. 2006;10(3):165-85.
連結：
8. Beringer P. Remington: the science and practice of pharmacy. 21 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
連結：

Altmetrics

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

When an article is available to download, a notice will be sent to your mailbox address.

E-mail ：