我國高等教育評鑑制度之研究

許宗仁

doi:10.6846/TKU.2011.00749

3.232.133.141，Hello！

Close
Search Quick Search Advanced Search Publication Search	Personal Service Member Login Searching History Use Bonus Card SYMSKAN
Browse Browse by University of Graduate Thesis Browse by Pinyin of Graduate Thesis Browse by Conference Proceedings Topic Browse by Conference Proceedings Publisher Browse by Pinyin of Conference Proceedings Browse by eBook Category Browse by eBook Topic Browse by eBook Publisher
Customer Services Authorize Airiti Recommend a Journal

Search Symbol (Half-width)	Description of Search Symbols
Space	"AND" indicates the intertwining of key terms used in a search
Double Quotation Marks ("") ( " " )	Double quotation marks indicate the beginning and end of a phrase, and the search will only include terms that appear in the same order of those within the quotations. Example: "image process" ： " image process "
?	Indicates a variable letter. Entering two ? will indicate two variable letters, and so on. Example: "Appl?", search results will yield apple, apply… e , appl y … ( (often used to English word searches) )
*	Indicates an unlimited number of variable letters to follow, from 1~n. Example: Enter "appl*", search results will yield apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(often used in English word searches) e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( (often used to English word searches) )
AND、OR、NOT	Boolean logic combinations of key words is a skill used to expand or refine search parameters. (1) AND (1) AND: Refines search parameters (2) OR (2) OR: Expands search parameters (3) NOT: Excludes irrelevant parameters

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier （ D igital O bject I dentifier ） ,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.

Using DOI as a persistent link

To create a persistent link, add「http://dx.doi.org/」「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」 before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is 10.5297/ser.1201.002 , you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.

Cite a document with DOI

When citing references, you should also cite the DOI if the article has one. If your citation guideline does not include DOIs, you may cite the DOI link.

DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration （ doi.airiti.com ）。

Data Source

College of Education > Master's Program, Graduate Institute of Higher Education
Social Sciences > Education

Bibliography Management Tool

Related Links

Report an Issue

Purchase Single Articles

Download PDF

我國高等教育評鑑制度之研究

A Study on Higher Education Evaluation System in Taiwan

許宗仁 , Masters　　Advisor：楊瑩　　

繁體中文 DOI： 10.6846/TKU.2011.00749

臺灣；高等教育評鑑；系所評鑑； Taiwan ； Higher Education Evaluation System ； Program Evaluation

Abstract │ Reference (377) │ Times Cited (3) │ Altmetrics

Abstract 〈TOP〉

Parallel Abstract 〈TOP〉

This study, by adopting the methods of document analysis and field interview, aims to analyze the higher education evaluation system in Taiwan from a macro perspective, and then to compare the program evaluation systems between the universities in the general education sector and the universities in the technological sector. 
     The main conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows:
1.Higher education in Taiwan have moved from the old ‘elite’ pattern to an  ‘universal’ pattern.
2.The ‘binary’ system of higher education has resulted in the differences in their educational administration, as well as evaluation system.
3.The role of the government has changed from an ‘initiator’ to a ‘supervisor’ , but the government still having direct influence over the universities, through the control over the number of intakes, and the allocation of funding.
4.The higher education evaluation system in Taiwan on the whole has been moving towards more diversified and specialized.
5.The implementation process of higher education evaluation systems in both sectors cover a self-evaluation and site visit by peer experts.
6.The presentation of results of higher education evaluation system varies with the types of evaluation of the two sectors.
7.The higher education evaluation systems for ‘general’ universities and ‘technological’ universities are different in terms of their superior authority, agency, legal basis, and system content.
8.There are similarities and differences in the opinions of the interviewees towards the systems, project, methods and results, etc. in the evaluation of the two sectors.

Reference ( 377 ) 〈TOP〉

王如哲（2004a，12月）。高等教育品質管理機制之國際經驗。載於國立暨南國際大學、國立教育研究院籌備處、中華民國教育行政學會、台灣教育政策與評鑑學會、國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系聯合舉辦之「第六屆海峽兩岸高等教育研討會－高等教育品質管理機制」論文集（頁15-26），南投縣。
連結：
王如哲（2005）。高等教育品質管理機制之國際經驗。台灣教育，632，21-29。
連結：
王如哲（2008）。歐洲高等教育品質保證的發展與展望。評鑑雙月刊，16，17-21。
連結：
王明源（2009）。論大學評鑑的整合與分工。評鑑雙月刊，18，9-13。
連結：
王保進（2006）。標竿取向的高等教育評鑑標準設計之研究。教育研究月刊，142，9-32。
連結：

Times Cited (3) 〈TOP〉

Altmetrics

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

When an article is available to download, a notice will be sent to your mailbox address.

E-mail ：